TimeSeeker wrote: ↑Tue Oct 09, 2018 8:08 am
Is the memory of past-self the same or different from a photograph?
How is it the same? How is it different?
I think it is similar in some ways and different in others. For me - the images in my mind are not as vivid as the images on a photo. On the other hand - a photo is still and memories are not.
But we could use a video as an example instead of a photo. Videos are vivid AND dynamic. Much more vivid than my own memories!
But videos do not contain the emotion/feeling that I EXPERIENCED while the video was filmed. And so videos are better than memories of self in some way, and worse in others.
Try not to think about what is self...by using knowledge, knowledge is not the real actual self.
There is no self in the past or future or presence.Direct experience, or experience, is the only thing that the present moment brings to us. The thought of 'me' within this immediate moment is an overlay upon it, not real...the real is behind the overlay.
The now is all that's real, now is this actual direct experience of being no one. There is no-place or anywhere in the world of concepts where consciousness is occuring/happening.
Direct Experience is Actuality manifesting right now without ''thinking'' about it.
It's all Source Energy and direct manifestation. You're actually manifesting directly right now.
You are not in an image, video, photo,brain or a body...except as conceived in this conceptional fiction.
Fiction is always of past tense, in memory which is dead. Awakeness is this alive present now that is the only actual real there is,was and ever will be infinitely.
.