The problem inherent within philosophy is the paradox. We observe one truth. Then we observe another truth. Both these truths effectively seem to disagree with eachother as one, relatively speaking, is the positive version of the other (and viceversa). In these respects we are left with a dualism founded on what appears to be "whole" truths in themselves. This perceivable wholeness causes a problem where one truth as a whole observes the oppositive as a negative limit of this very same whole truth...the problem occurs in the respect this is a relativistic perspective considering "wholeness" and "absence" are premised in the picking of an origin point to measure what is true and not true.
However this in itself results in a paradox as truth is subject to choice...and in these respects is dependent upon not just choice but an inherent degree of randomness. However this randomness is mitigated that while choice occurs a dualism (at minimum) is evident with the nature of choice itself...hence the act of choice is causal in the respect it seperates one truth from another and acts as its own limit with this seperation resulting in a dualism simultaneously observes a relation which in itself not only exists as one but effectively observes a connection.
The paradox, in these respects is the foundation of truth, through choice and in itself is paradoxical.
Paradox as the Foundation of Choice
Re: Paradox as the Foundation of Choice
Paradox is a feature of reality. Life is a strange loop.