T.B.D.

[Sir-Sister-of-Suck]

I could respond to each and every point...and may eventually

I'm sure you would want to leave it open-ended like that, because you have no idea how to actually respond. Well, I'm going to do you a solid, and tell you exactly how to respond:

"I'm sorry for being a pathological liar, and an exaggerator of facts. I have never actually scored 181 on an IQ test, and I did indeed make up my IQ in order to seek validation through the internet; I did this to compensate for my various, real life character flaws like actually being an awkward, chubby guy with man boobies, having various social inabilities, and the fact that I can't actually get any of my work published - because I am a crazy nutjob trapped in a prison of his own nonsense and grammatical imperfection. And yes, I do have a lot of internalized anger because my wart-covered hands have never actually touched a woman - that was an especially spot-on observation on your end, sir-sister-of-suck."

Clearly, this is how you should have responded to me. Trust me, you would be able to see that this was the one true answer, if it weren't for your various social inabilities. Offer stands, by the way; Feel free to just copy/paste it, so I can see it in your own words. It is definitely your ''out".

What exactly is it that you want out of all of this?

In the future, when you decide to make something else up - don't let it get to the point where 'proof' for that lie is relevant to the discussion, and you have to make up a bunch of shitty excuses about why you now can't supply said 'proof'. You made an even bigger mistake, when you tried to cover up this lie with another lie, that could also be easily disproven - because you did no fucking research on the IQ range of the Stanford-Binet test, before you haphazardly let it slip out that you scored a number higher than any adult, possibly could.

The easiest lies to tell, are the ones that are mere exaggerations of something that actually happened, and not completely fabricated events. I believe this is mostly what you do anyway, so I'd stick to only that. I mean, I'd tell you not to lie at all, but I think you appreciate the anonymity that comes along in your relationship with forums, too much. You unfortunately just use that to your advantage, to the fullest extent - to a point of absurdity. To a point, that a guy who admittedly has problems with women can "Christian Grey" every woman he's ever dated, even though he says he's an awkward fuck.

By the way, what is your 'panty tab' up to, now? How much money do you owe to all the women that have had their panties 'cave-manned' apart by you?

[Sir-Sister-of-Suck]

Don't be so judgemental...if you accept the universe for what it is then you must accept the views of other's as extensions of that very same universe. If you do not accept the universe at it is...then don't preach about going with the flow of the universe.

What is judgmental about acknowledging patterns?

Why do you equate "going with the flow" and "accepting the universe" with having no discernment?

Why do you always seem under the impression that your view is worth imposing over another's, when it is clear that your views are fucked up, toxic crap? Am I being judgmental or observant? Seriously, you've proven yourself to be an ass... so fuck off.

What an angry person.

Well no, she just hasn't been forced into this position of being super non-judgmental, because she hasn't been ostracized as a psychotic, dissociated autist by the vast majority of sites, she's been on.

http://www.thephysicsforum.com/trash-ca ... hread.html

By the way, john, you have consistently implied that you're unaffected by the way other people look at you, and that the insults on here don't bother you - but why did you stop replying to the fine gentlemen who actually understand shit, over there, because they all put you in the loony bin?

[Sir-Sister-of-Suck]

Not when he is already fucking you the way I am fucking you.

As usual, you're fucking yourself and imagining it to be someone else. Seriously, fuck off with that. You're too delusional.

Well, he's able to find a few people.

A little while ago, I looked him up to see if he was a well known troll in the online streets. He isn't a troll, but I discovered that he actually has a bit of a weird cult following - however it's always from people who admittedly don't understand what he's saying, themselves. They just like the 'poetic way he be writin,' and shit. Thought that was humorous, even his own fans don't really get him.

[Eodnhoj7]

I could respond to each and every point...and may eventually

I'm sure you would want to leave it open-ended like that, because you have no idea how to actually respond. Well, I'm going to do you a solid, and tell you exactly how to respond:

"I'm sorry for being a pathological liar, and an exaggerator of facts. I have never actually scored 181 on an IQ test, and I did indeed make up my IQ in order to seek validation through the internet; I did this to compensate for my various, real life character flaws like actually being an awkward, chubby guy with man boobies, having various social inabilities, and the fact that I can't actually get any of my work published - because I am a crazy nutjob trapped in a prison of his own nonsense and grammatical imperfection. And yes, I do have a lot of internalized anger because my wart-covered hands have never actually touched a woman - that was an especially spot-on observation on your end, sir-sister-of-suck."

Aww someone is cranky...and stupid...if you have read what I said the score of 181 I scored was false because I memorized the answers....that was the whole point.

Aww...it's okay...

Clearly, this is how you should have responded to me. Trust me, you would be able to see that this was the one true answer, if it weren't for your various social inabilities. Offer stands, by the way; Feel free to just copy/paste it, so I can see it in your own words. It is definitely your ''out".

What exactly is it that you want out of all of this?

In the future, when you decide to make something else up - don't let it get to the point where 'proof' for that lie is relevant to the discussion, and you have to make up a bunch of shitty excuses about why you now can't supply said 'proof'. You made an even bigger mistake, when you tried to cover up this lie with another lie, that could also be easily disproven - because you did no fucking research on the IQ range of the Stanford-Binet test, before you haphazardly let it slip out that you scored a number higher than any adult, possibly could.

Actually I provided sources...

The easiest lies to tell, are the ones that are mere exaggerations of something that actually happened, and not completely fabricated events. I believe this is mostly what you do anyway, so I'd stick to only that. I mean, I'd tell you not to lie at all, but I think you appreciate the anonymity that comes along in your relationship with forums, too much. You unfortunately just use that to your advantage, to the fullest extent - to a point of absurdity. To a point, that a guy who admittedly has problems with women can "Christian Grey" every woman he's ever dated, even though he says he's an awkward fuck.

By the way, what is your 'panty tab' up to, now? How much money do you owe to all the women that have had their panties 'cave-manned' apart by you?

Someone feels threatened...all these points about women being brought up that have nothing to do with the thread....all this projection...


Regardless, the point in the relationship forum is this:

Relationships are not just messy but fundamentally contradictory in many respects.

If I make this claim:

People will claim you are an ignorant virgin.

Or are some asshole who uses women all the time.

It's a lose lose...a man cannot state how women's behavior is just as bad if not worse than men without some back lash against him.

The Christian Grey point is a simple one: Women like to be dominated...they have no self-respect...one has to make a moral choice as a man whether one will become this "asshole" or not...it is a lose lose either way as no balance or dignity is observed.



Here I will get back on track with a real simple argument.

Intelligence cannot be measured because the variables used to determine intelligence are literally "chosen" and this element of choice contains an element of subjective randomness.

[Eodnhoj7]

Not when he is already fucking you the way I am fucking you.

As usual, you're fucking yourself and imagining it to be someone else. Seriously, fuck off with that. You're too delusional.

Well, he's able to find a few people.

A little while ago, I looked him up to see if he was a well known troll in the online streets. He isn't a troll, but I discovered that he actually has a bit of a weird cult following - however it's always from people who admittedly don't understand what he's saying, themselves. They just like the 'poetic way he be writin,' and shit. Thought that was humorous, even his own fans don't really get him.

What "cult" following? I have none...and if I do I would enjoy if you pointed it out. I am only on one other forum to get feed back.

Actually a lot of what I argue many people claim to understand aspects of and whatever they do not understand I give an explanation until they find some level of satisfaction.

In all truth sir sister....tell me what you do understand...tell me what is true considering you understand so much.

[Eodnhoj7]

What is judgmental about acknowledging patterns?

Why do you equate "going with the flow" and "accepting the universe" with having no discernment?

Why do you always seem under the impression that your view is worth imposing over another's, when it is clear that your views are fucked up, toxic crap? Am I being judgmental or observant? Seriously, you've proven yourself to be an ass... so fuck off.

What an angry person.

Well no, she just hasn't been forced into this position of being super non-judgmental, because she hasn't been ostracized as a psychotic, dissociated autist by the vast majority of sites, she's been on.

http://www.thephysicsforum.com/trash-ca ... hread.html

By the way, john, you have consistently implied that you're unaffected by the way other people look at you, and that the insults on here don't bother you - but why did you stop replying to the fine gentlemen who actually understand shit, over there, because they all put you in the loony bin?

If you read the posts I got kicked off because I observed there interpretations did not match up...it is a dead or dying forum.

Kicked off:

1) Argued a theoretical 1 dimensional point as premise for ether...personal theories were not allowed on the forum only those theories established by the scientific community, which is a contradiction considering a man posted an article about a prominent scientist that the universe was conscious and they all called the man in the scientific community "a loon" (not exact words).

2) Argued the proportions in which the particles move (circles and approximations of circles) give evidence to an ether in the respect the circle (and its' approximations as loops) are constants. This constant gives premise to geometric form acting as a unifying glue to reality.

3) I argued "too much metaphysics"...even in the section premised in philosophy.

4) Etc. I was on the forum for about a few weeks about 10 months ago. You have to remember, people cannot read more than a paragraph at a time...when most arguments cannot be limited to such a short means of interpretation considering the number of variables around.


If you want to know where else I was kicked off, a few months ago, was in the sciencechat forum (which has both a philosophy and personal theories section) as I claimed Husserl and Kant where wrong...in the personal theories section. But a lot of people are banned from the forum and a member or two has observed the decline along with a lot of people being upset over not just my banning but the banning of a lot of people.

Most of these forums are run by people who cannot make it in there own fields and want to post their own interpretations of religiously believed dogma.






And no...I do not avoid ad-hominems...people may claim I am gentlemen...but I never made the claim about myself.

[Eodnhoj7]

There are some posters who go in the same small circles over and over to feed themselves, and it seems like a very low form of energy that not only clogs up the channels for a greater flow of energy, but it drags everything down to its dense, self-serving level.

As a result, it appears at times that the forum becomes less of a door of exploration -- and more of a window looking onto the madness of some who are spun-up in their repetitive intoxication and who need/seek to spin-up everything else to support that.

Don't be so judgemental...if you accept the universe for what it is then you must accept the views of other's as extensions of that very same universe. If you do not accept the universe at it is...then don't preach about going with the flow of the universe.

For me, it's not so much what someone's view is, nor whether that view coincides with my own, but rather it is unsupported claims that annoy me. I can honestly say that I enjoy genuine conflict of ideas. But when a post employs a convoluted logic, or no logic at all, it gives me that fingernails-on-chalkboard feeling.

You have to elaborate if the "unsupported claims" is directed at me or her...I don't know how to address your point otherwise.

My issue with "lacewings" logic is that it is based upon a universal materialism (if I understand correctly) and this view of reality inevitably results in a variety of beliefs and perspectives if it is going to be accepted as is....in simpler terms she cannot say I am wrong if the material universe is the sole means from which I result....it would effectively be the universe "arguing" against itself under a state of continual contradiction which necessitates truth to exist in the respect a contradiction is dependent upon truth.

[Eodnhoj7]

Sir-Sister:


To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Eodnhoj7. His rationale is extremely subtle, and without at least a solid grasp of theoretical philosophy most of his remarks will go over the typical reader's head.

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=22999&start=45

Yes. There’s also Eodnhoj7's heavy metaphysical outlook, which is deftly woven into his character- his personal philosophy draws heavily from Wittgenstein literature, for instance.

And yes, by the way, i DO have a Eodnhoj7 tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It’s for the ladies’ eyes only- but even then they have to demonstrate that they’re within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand.

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=22999&start=60





Fickle......

[Eodnhoj7]

Oh, yah, sure. Don't have any mental illnesses, but for some reason, you just felt the need to see multiple different psychologists, several times in your life. Makes sense. Definitely doesn't sound like yet another made up story from the Eodnhoj legends so you could damage control what people have said about you.

Lol...just saw post....no you go when you have actually have life experience...or too much of it.

When you have literal ufo's in your back yard and they light up your room with blinding light...you ask a psychiatrist if you are sane.

If the psychiatrist says you are sane you ask the neighbors nearby if they seen anything...and they say "yes"...you still have to question your sanity.

I am not claiming sanity or insanity but rather claim that sanity itself should be put to question.

[commonsense]

Don't be so judgemental...if you accept the universe for what it is then you must accept the views of other's as extensions of that very same universe. If you do not accept the universe at it is...then don't preach about going with the flow of the universe.

For me, it's not so much what someone's view is, nor whether that view coincides with my own, but rather it is unsupported claims that annoy me. I can honestly say that I enjoy genuine conflict of ideas. But when a post employs a convoluted logic, or no logic at all, it gives me that fingernails-on-chalkboard feeling.

You have to elaborate if the "unsupported claims" is directed at me or her...I don't know how to address your point otherwise.

"Unsupported claims" is not directed at Lacey nor at you, Eodnhoj. I am annoyed by anyone who won't offer either imperical evidence or rational thought along with their assertions. I certainly don't find this to be the case with Lacey or with you.

be

[Sir-Sister-of-Suck]

Fickle......

What is this random, gay-ass shit you're doing, here? You're trying to switch the attention off to me, by showing me an obviously sarcastic, meme post that I've already had to explain to you was sarcastic. I guess when I said dealing with you was like dealing with a dementia patient, that held more truth than I realized. Fortunately, all this does, is further point out your inability to take social cues.

I guess since you're so incredibly incompetent at everything you do, this is where I'm going to have to take over, and do the work for you to expose myself; If you really wanted a post that makes me look really bad, you should have pointed to this one, where I genuinely thought that the NRA was a 'weapons manufacturer.' I mean how fucking stupid was I to think that? Pretty fucking stupid, if I say so myself

Much like you invoking the power of the nazi, though - it's very clear what you're trying to do. You just want to move the conversation away from this place that you don't want it to be, because I have exposed you as the obvious liar you know you are. I never even claimed to be better than you, I hope you realize? This conversation was never some sort of a dick-measuring contest, between you and I - this is more like the conversation where I just chop your balls off.

[Sir-Sister-of-Suck]

Seeing my 'notifications' light up like a Christmas tree, from all the individual posts john doe felt the need to make, sure was pretty.

Aww someone is cranky...and stupid...

Awww, someone is patronizingly passive-aggressive. The kind of 'being cranky' where someone is too spineless to actually come out and directly say it.

Why don't you just tell me how you really feel. (circa Sat Aug 25, 2018 1:54 pm)

By the way, I've already admitted that talking to you is a frustrating endeavor. I make no dispute, there. I believe I likened dealing with you, to dealing with a dementia patient, if you remember. P.S: Offer still stands, by the way; I wasn't joking, say what I told you to say, and I'll drop everything, here.

if you have read what I said the score of 181 I scored was false because I memorized the answers....that was the whole point.

It doesn't fucking matter, you ham-sandwich. I explained this to you; Even if you got ALL of the answers correct, an adult cannot score that high on an IQ test. In particular, the Stanford-Binet has never gone up that high, and I'm not even aware of any adult IQ test that has; I'm hyper-actively aware you said that wasn't your actual made-up IQ - but that doesn't just clean off the dog shit you stepped in with this one. It still exposes you as a liar, you know

Why don't you just go ahead and show me what IQ test you could have used to score 181? I'll look up a cheat-sheet on reddit, and see if I can get a score similar to the one you supposedly did.

Actually I provided sources...

That showed information I already told you about; Yes, you can score that high on an IQ test, IF you're a kid. This is how 'Bobby Fischer' scored 187, and even your own 'quora' source acknowledged this.

The sources you gave me actually dig a bigger hole for yourself than if you didn't say anything- because they were all about the 'Stanford-Binet' test, specifically. And that indicates that is the test you had in mind, when you claim to have falsified an IQ of '181.' So NOW you have to do some more barrel scraping, in order to convince me that this wasn't the fucking test you took, in your imagination. Even if you are able to find an IQ test that goes above the 170 range for an adult, I'm not sure that's acceptable, any longer. Oh my god, it's mind-blowing how much of a confident idiot you are.

all these points about women being brought up that have nothing to do with the thread

They actually do, because my point was about how you're a pathological liar. I can see why you want to move away from that, I mean being a liar and all, and this particular lie being so cringey now that your mind has taken the time to think about it - but I can't let you off the hook that easily. I have a list of contradictions that you have made on this forum and others, by the way. They weren't hard to find. Would you like to go over some of them?

So you never answered my question. What is your 'lingerie' tab up to, now?

Relationships are not just messy but fundamentally contradictory in many respects.

If I make this claim:

People will claim you are an ignorant virgin.

Or are some asshole who uses women all the time.

Don't worry, you don't need to worry about that dichotomy; No one buys the idea that your naked body has ever been anyone near a woman, in the first place. I mean, other forum-dwelling virgins, will probably buy it.

I am only on one other forum to get feed back.

Another lie, for anyone looking into this discussion, FYI; One only needs to copy/paste his name into google to find out that is not the case, and that would be just the ones you're on under this username.

[Sir-Sister-of-Suck]

What an angry person.

Well no, she just hasn't been forced into this position of being super non-judgmental, because she hasn't been ostracized as a psychotic, dissociated autist by the vast majority of sites, she's been on.

http://www.thephysicsforum.com/trash-ca ... hread.html

By the way, john, you have consistently implied that you're unaffected by the way other people look at you, and that the insults on here don't bother you - but why did you stop replying to the fine gentlemen who actually understand shit, over there, because they all put you in the loony bin?

If you read the posts I got kicked off because I observed there interpretations did not match up...it is a dead or dying forum.

Well yes, but according to the moderator, you could have still posted in that thread.

Kicked off:

You are definitely fighting the good fight, continuing to defend nonsense I never asked you to, months after anyone can actually defend themselves, back. You sure don't reek of insecurity over your own beliefs, like I said you do when I brought up that thread in the first place, no-sirree.

When you have literal ufo's in your back yard and they light up your room with blinding light...you ask a psychiatrist if you are sane.

Psychiatrists =/= pychologists, you know.

So where we are at, is that you've seen 'multiple different psychologists,' and at least one psychiatrist, if your words are correct. For someone who is perfectly sane, you sure do have an extensive history checking yourself in to see mental-disorder related doctors, don't you? Guess absolutely none of them thought anything of these schizophrenic/psychotic-type delusions, either. They did say you could be a particle theorist if you wanted to, though. How very interesting...

[Sir-Sister-of-Suck]

By the way, there's another hole in what he's saying about having scored 181 on an IQ test, if he chooses to go with the "well I took it as a kid" defense; If eodnhoj did indeed take this test as a kid - as that's the only way he could have been assessed an IQ that high under the Standford-Binet (even if he cheated by memorizing the answers) - there probably would have been no need for him to cheat to get a score that high, because if he really does have an IQ of 160 as an adult - it would have been much higher anyway, being scored as a kid.

[Sir-Sister-of-Suck]

Additional inquiry on the mental health, thing; By any chance, in any of your numourous visits to the array of mental disorder doctors that you have apparently paid a visit to, have you ever told any of them, that you've suggested the desire to kill people?

I am going to get published in a philosophy journal, even though the odds are against me for not having a masters or Phd. The odds can go f'ck themselves...then probably become a mercernary somewhere in some foreign country. I haven't killed anyone yet, torn a few ligaments in person, but never killed anyone. The chaos will be a nice change. I'll be laughing the whole time, because it will alleviate the boredom I currently feel, and that is what I struggle with most...boredom. I only played paintball one time, but destroyed a whole team on my own, while shooting my own team also. It is important to have fun in life, otherwise what is the point.

I mean, my first instinct would have been to take this bit as a joke, but I'm not the guy claiming to see UFOs going off in his backyard, or 'exorcist' ladies scurrying across hallways. Or hates women... and is trapped in his own mind because he doesn't know how to explain things to people. I mean, I'm definitely not saying it's a legitimate feeling, I just think your psychologists and psychiatrists would find it interesting.

Maybe the reason why you haven't been diagnosed with anything - you know, even though you have visited as many mental-health doctors as you have, for some reason - is because you've intentionally withheld information, such as the idea that you will "probably become a mercenary" ... [snip] "I'll be laughing the whole time"

Could have also been sarcasm, I suppose. But I believe you've set quite the precedence, you see, because you didn't think my 'rick and morty' copy/pasta meme was sarcasm, even after I told you it was. It seems that sarcasm isn't exactly your forte, so maybe you can give us some clarification on the matter?