Constructing a God Type Table

[Greta]

I hear babbling. Pray, is it a babbling brook? Might it be a swarm of mosquitoes and my ears need cleaning? Never mind, on with the thread.

Okay, so far we have:

1. Anthropomorphic deity
2. Deist prime mover
3. Panentheism
4. Pantheism
5. Spinozan pantheism
6. The "ground of being"
7. Everything
8. Nothing

Is that full coverage now?

[henry quirk]

Here's one more...

9. Memetic (possibly psychotronic) *parasite feeding on worship(ers).









*call Orkin

[Dontaskme]

Is that full coverage now?

No, emptiness cannot be filled.

There is no thing to fill it with.

.

[Dontaskme]

I hear babbling.

The babbling is inseparable from the hearer. Enjoy the babble, only you hear it.

[Greta]

I hear babbling.

The babbling is inseparable from the hearer. Enjoy the babble, only you hear it.

A twittering mayhaps?

Babble and twitter
Chatter and chitter.
Nonsense and yabber
Garble and blabber.
The realm of DontAskMe
Garbling most reliably.

[uwot]

Wisdom is knowing you only have your own version of truth to rely on.

So what does that say about someone who insists their own version of truth is the truth?

[Dontaskme]

The realm of DontAskMe

The realm of Dam is knowledge known.

Dam is not the knower of the known, Dam is the known that cannot be known by Dam, for there is no knower in the known. The known is in the knower.


No one owns knowledge, no one to claim it......it's source is not-knowing. Any claim of a knower is to identify, to separate the knower from the known.

knower knowing known is one.

If knowledge is copyrighted as belonging to a person...then where did that person get the knowledge?

Where can the the very first original knower be located?

It can't because knowledge is an imagined story arising from nothing/no thing.

The mind that claims...I know...is a phantom.


.

[Dontaskme]

Wisdom is knowing you only have your own version of truth to rely on.

So what does that say about someone who insists their own version of truth is the truth?

Knowledge informs the illusory nature of reality...truth is a fiction, it cannot be known by a fictional character.

Silent unclaimed not-knowing is the only truth.

Versions of truth are only fictions, they are as true as they are believed to be true. No belief, no fiction.

What's left in the absence of belief, is just pure blank not-knowing awareness.

You are the canvas (awareness) on which you paint your dreams as believed to be true for you only. There is nothing outside of your own belief that can be proved to exist.

Outside of you is only believed to exist because you exist, in that you are aware of what appears to be outside of you.

No you, no outside...no outside, no you. Both subject and object can only exist in the exact same moment/space herenow nowhere.


.


Every conceivable object seen/known is a hologram of the same seer/knower.
That's why it can appear that there are others separate from you..this is the holgraphic illusion of the one light.

.

When the hologram disappears into it's state of pure energy from which it is sourced, nothing is lost. Light cannot die, because light has never been born, only the hologram is born albeit an illusion of light and shadow play.

.

.

[uwot]

Knowledge informs the illusory nature of reality...truth is a fiction, it cannot be known by a fictional character.

Ya kinda missed the point. If "truth is a fiction", for you to present your truth as fact demonstrates that by your own definition, you lack wisdom.

[Dontaskme]

Knowledge informs the illusory nature of reality...truth is a fiction, it cannot be known by a fictional character.

Ya kinda missed the point. If "truth is a fiction", for you to present your truth as fact demonstrates that by your own definition, you lack wisdom.

I lack wisdom only in the sense that I am a fictional character - because a fictional character cannot know anything or be wise.

Knowing I do not know, what is or isn't true is wisdom.

Knowledge informs illusory reality. Wisdom understands reality as illusory.

Truths only relate within the dream of separation, in the story of i...duality.
Knowledge (perception) knows the world. Wisdom understands life is non-dual.

[uwot]

I lack wisdom only in the sense that I am a fictional character...

Is that a fact?

[Dontaskme]

I lack wisdom only in the sense that I am a fictional character...

Is that a fact?

Who's asking?

[uwot]

I lack wisdom only in the sense that I am a fictional character...

Is that a fact?

Who's asking?

Well, according to my version of truth, which I accept may be flawed, me.

[Dontaskme]

Is that a fact?

Who's asking?

Well, according to my version of truth, which I accept may be flawed, me.

Well, there is your answer.

The knowledge of whether knowledge is fact can only arise to the fictional sense of a separate self aka a 'me' that wants to know...which I've already showed is a fictional character that cannot know anything.

And the 'me' that wants to know by asking - must already have the answer... else why would the question even arise if there was no answer?

Life does not ask questions about what is fact or fiction...this can only pertain to the sense of a separate 'me' where there isn't one. Separation is the knowledge of opposites, that have to exist in the same reality as one. Therefore, knowledge is a fiction arising here now sourced in not-knowing. You are this not-knowing knowing...a fictional fact.



All the above is a mentally constructed story arising in awareness. Awareness is neither fact or fiction, it just is. It's all pervading.All encompassing.


.

[uwot]

Who's asking?

Well, according to my version of truth, which I accept may be flawed, me.

Well, there is your answer.

Accepting that my version of truth may be flawed is how you defined wisdom. You, however, do not accept that your version may be flawed, hence by your own definition, you are not wise.

The knowledge of whether knowledge is fact can only arise to the fictional sense of a separate self aka a 'me' that wants to know...which I've already showed is a fictional character that cannot know anything.

If you can't know it, you cannot have shown it.

And the 'me' that wants to know by asking - must already have the answer... else why would the question even arise if there was no answer?

I see. So science is a waste of time, because we already know all the answers, and your posing the above question is simply a rhetorical device, because you already know the answer.

Life does not ask questions about what is fact or fiction...this can only pertain to the sense of a separate 'me' where there isn't one. Separation is the knowledge of opposites, that have to exist in the same reality as one. Therefore, knowledge is a fiction arising here now sourced in not-knowing. You are this not-knowing knowing...a fictional fact.

All the above is a mentally constructed story arising in awareness. Awareness is neither fact or fiction, it just is. It's all pervading.All encompassing.

Really? How do you know?