Philosophy Explorer wrote: βThu Jul 19, 2018 9:44 pm
...compare eras ...
you also need to compare Eros.

PhilX
Music is not simply music. It is always an inseparable accouterments to a movement, to a mood, to a person's daydream, about love, about religion, about revolution, about war, about sadness.
Thus, new music is adopted (not adapted) by the new people, and they establish an identity via including music.
This was strongly felt in the sixties, what with the Viet Nam war in the USA, and the sexual revolution in other parts of the free world. But it was strongly felt in other eras in history; communists loved their marches, as much as the Nazis did; and I participated in communist marches as a kid, back in Hungary, and I tell you, that music raised your spirit. I talked to an athlete, expat of Hungary, and he said before a high-jump (with which he won local competitions) he would gear up at the starting spot with humming communist marches.
So to say that this music is better or that, it is highly individualistic not only because beauty lies in the eye of the cup-holder, but also because "our music" always sounds by bias much nicer than "their music".
If the "our music" phenomenon was not there, there would never be any new music. But there is.