Exposing Liberal Hypocrisy and Conservative Close-Mindedness

[gaffo]

“We’ve accomplished a lot with respect to NATO… everyone has agreed to substantially up their commitment, they are going to up it to levels they never thought of before.”
- POTUS Trump



How can you not like the guy.

Wow! You really belive his bullshit. Obama already did this. Now you won't hear me arguing against the idea that some European countries were shirking their commitments to NATO and it'll be a good thing if they pay more as we can then have more of a say rather than NATO just being an extension of the US hegemony not sure the US military will like that tho.
If the EU survives and integrates more then it's obvious that given Obama's refocusing on the Pacific and Trump's current direction with Russia then they'll need to seriously consider an EU army ad not sure we can trust the US anymore but at least no more ME debacles. Shame we won't be in it as it could be a pretty interesting professional military, eastern European squaddies, BrIrish military training and structure; French and German engineering, Dutch and Swiss small arms, etc.
Still more interesting is that we might vote in our own brand of loon who if he gets in might try to leave NATO and remove all your airbases.will also be more friendly to Iran than Saudi and definitely never be going on anymore adventures in the ME.

The rest of your stuff is just waffle.

agree with your above perspective,

but you have your own IDIOTS (Brexit bots) - May looks to be soon gone. I bet your next PM old Boris will MBGA!!!!!!!!!!!

will Boris sell you a hat or two too?

[gaffo]

I've got my eye on 10 or so British movies/TV shows via amazon UK - I made out like a bandit 2 yrs ago - and after May is removed i expect the pound to fall again.

I'll be keeping an eye on the exchange rate over the next month or two and buy when the buying is good for me .

[gaffo]

The constitution clearly states the requirements to be a POTUS.

who cares what the Constitutions says.

its outdated.

we have Trump now.

[gaffo]

Whatever happens now, the seeds of tyranny have been planted with the effective removal of standards regarding presidential financial transparency and conflicts of interest.

precisely - per my earlier post ;-(.

[gaffo]

...

Mr. President, you’re not the only free-thinker to think that. Some even wonder how the self-described communist Van Jones managed to get the ear of that president.
...

Or that the current Prez is besty friends with a lieutenant colonel of the KGB?

I read that the indictments of the Russians state no evidence, only unsupported conclusions.

Sounds familiar.

Rationally:

It's political theater that the Left hopes will stick with repetition.

That, and timing the release with Trump’s Russian visit, sounds like more resistance from beauracratic fiefdoms to destabilize the constitutionally-elected executive branch.

Hows that North Korean "Photo op" (which i stated was and you denied it was so) meeting go? old Kim now says he made no promise to stop making nukes!

but its still "success!" for you - maybe you could not hear Kim say so - you ears buried in Trumps ass so deep.

[Walker]

It ain’t over till the fat lady sings.
However, there aren't any fat ladies in NK.

gaffo, you’re sounding coo coo.

You can sing solo, and await your chorus.

[Greta]

No, it is not hypocritical by wanting at least some some semblance or pretence of probity in governance.

There is no need for you to incoherently babble against me in what looks like a desperate attempt to justify the idiotic comments you made earlier. Why not just admit that you stuffed up before and move on?

Greta, you are simply insulting me over and over and over, and demand without presenting reasonable arguments that I capitulate to your arguments.

I expected more of a site moderator. Much more.

For my exit statement from this thread: I won't take the blame for your not seeing reason in my posts.

You accused me of being a hypocrite because I expected some level of probity from governments of whatever stripe. If you are to make such asinine claims then expect a bollocking - from site moderators or anyone else.

It is not hypocritical to expect those about to enjoy the privilege of power as representative of the people to make their financial interests and tax payments transparent and to not have major conflicts of interest. One of Trump's first acts as POTUS was to open the pipeline whose works had been held up while potential environmental impacts on the area were being assessed. Trump is a major shareholder in the project and since then, the project has proved to be an environmental disaster.

[artisticsolution]

Liking Trump is no crime.

dissagree - a crime against humanity it is. by ignorance or willingly - its still a crime.

That is not my quote...it's veg's

[Arising_uk]

…
but you have your own IDIOTS (Brexit bots) - May looks to be soon gone. I bet your next PM old Boris will MBGA!!!!!!!!!!!

will Boris sell you a hat or two too?

It's not a foregone thing that Boris will get the party vote as he is disliked heartily by many Tory MP's and neither is it that they would win a general election if one was called(not that we can really call them anymore as we've aped that stupid fixed term idea) as Jezza might get the nod as the alternative candidate as UKIP mght once again split the Tory party over Brexit and this time they can't call a referendum to save themselves.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Liking Trump is no crime.

dissagree - a crime against humanity it is. by ignorance or willingly - its still a crime.

That is not my quote...it's veg's

No it's not (but gaffo's response is nonsensical).

[vegetariantaxidermy]

'Reverse racism' is patronising and racist in itself. It's implying that only 'white' people can be racist, since they are inherently superior. ''Progressives'' use the word as a weapon they have little control over, flinging it around mindlessly like a toddler with a lightsabre.
Racism is racism. It's not even possible to be a 'reverse racist'.

Why would that be so? In India non-Indians compain of racism quite a lot. When they return the favour, that is reverse racism, there needn't be a single white person involved in the entire transaction.

As a rule, reverse racism is just racism against the normal flow (which is typically from majority to minority).

Everybody can be racist, probably everybody is, and that's almost certainly the most Libtard sentence I have ever written. The only difference with whiteys like me is that we get to be racist absolutely everywhere we go, whereas Indians only really get to be the racists in India.

The special advantage I get from being English is that I get to be racist against Americans of all colours, and the f****** French as well.

Pull the other one. We all know that 'hate speech' laws are specifically for 'white' people. For starters they aren't a particular 'protected group', therefore they are the only ones who CAN have 'hate-speech' directed at them and are the only people who have to constantly be walking on eggshells. For everyone else it's a free-for-all. 'Hate speech' laws are nothing more than a political ploy to control (certain) people and destroy free speech. f*** I f****** hate hypocritical ''PCProgressive'' fuckwits! They are invariably reasonably well-heeled white bastards (often clueless 'academic' types). pssst. I can say that because they aren't in a 'protected group' BWHAHAHAAA! The most blatantly racist people I've ever encountered have been Indians and white South Africans, with Indians having the advantage of being a 'protected group' in 'White Western' countries.

[artisticsolution]

dissagree - a crime against humanity it is. by ignorance or willingly - its still a crime.

That is not my quote...it's veg's

No it's not (but gaffo's response is nonsensical).

Oops...sry veg! Then I have no clue who said it.

I think we can only go by words and actions when trying to know a person. One thing is for sure, no one is perfect.

I try to look for motive too. If the motive is up to no good, the end result tends to be not good, even though it might be what we think we wanted....chances are good we were duped. Thinking might makes it right, does not necessarily make it so.

Whereas, if you have good motives, it might not turn out perfect, but at least it came from a selfless place which at least tried to do the best for the majority of people.

Say what you will, but it has been my observation the American version of 'republican' has been the motive, 'everyman for himself'.

Whereas the 'Democrat' says, 'all for one and one for all'.

That's the difference in a nutshell.....

Motive.

[gaffo]

It ain’t over till the fat lady sings.
However, there aren't any fat ladies in NK.

gaffo, you’re sounding coo coo.

You can sing solo, and await your chorus.

I used to singing solo, hows your allegiance to Manchurian president Bone spurs comrade?

8 weeks from now - expect the shit storm.