It matters not whether a concept arises as an animate or inanimate object because that which is aware of an animate or inanimate conceptual object is neither animate nor inanimate ..awareness is not a thing that can be known..it is the knowing, the only knowing there is. Awareness is not a thing seen, it is the seeing, the only seeing there is.
.
If I read this with closed eyes, I would have sworn it had been written by JohnDoe7.
I don't see a connection between this and the two paradices of god, and I don't see a connection between this and my comment on yours (i.e. unicorns exist.)
But as a diversion, I agree with your observation that awareness is not a thing seen, it is the seeing. Cogito ergo sum.
But how this thought was borne out of the discussion is not clear to me.
It matters not whether a concept arises as an animate or inanimate object
I don't see a connection between this and the two paradices of god, and I don't see a connection between this and my comment on yours (i.e. unicorns exist.)
But how this thought was borne out of the discussion is not clear to me.
Allow me to refresh your memory....
Therefore unicorns exist.
Therefore three-headed purple stone gobblers with polka-dot mantles exist whom teen-age girls go gaga over.
Therefore the seven-breasted Whore of Babylon exists.
It matters not whether a concept arises as an animate or inanimate object
-1- wrote: ↑Mon Jun 25, 2018 12:08 am
I don't see a connection between this and the two paradices of god, and I don't see a connection between this and my comment on yours (i.e. unicorns exist.)
The paradox has already been explained - it's a myth, there is no paradox in reality, reality is not in relationship with any thing. Things are thoughts which are illusory fictitious appearances of the one infinite mind.
-1- wrote: ↑Mon Jun 25, 2018 12:08 amBut how this thought was borne out of the discussion is not clear to me.
It's clear to any one with an ounce of clarity of mind that all thought is triggered by preceding thought which when believed gives rise to the illusory continuity of the ''I thought'' ... that being a fictional dream within pure awareness the dreamer.
-1- wrote: ↑Sat Jun 23, 2018 6:12 pm
Why not? can you substantiate your position?
Because infinity+any finite number=infinity where any finite number is your waiting time.
"where any finite number is your waiting time" -- substitute "infinity" for "any finite number" and you got why your assumption is not valid. You can wait a finite amount of time. You can wait an infinitely long time. There is no reason why you must restrict waiting time to one or to the other.
You cannot wait an infinitely long time. Time passes in specific finite rate.
bahman wrote: ↑Mon Jun 25, 2018 12:25 pm
You cannot wait an infinitely long time. Time passes in specific finite rate.
Says who?
And if it is indeed true that it passes at a specific (?) finite rate, you can still wait for an infinite amount of time. The two are not incompatible at all.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Tue Jun 26, 2018 6:31 am
That which is aware of time passing never moves. It observes movement while it itself is timeless and motionless.
Only the mind aka “thought” moves not you. You being the awareness.
Time therefore is an illusory appearance of the real.
.
The infinite here now cannot experience itself, it is the experiencing. .time and space is a frame by frame experience in it.
.
Dontaskme wrote:
It matters not whether a concept arises as an animate or inanimate object
Dontaskme wrote:
The paradox has already been explained - it's a myth, there is no paradox in reality, reality is not in relationship with any thing. Things are thoughts which are illusory fictitious appearances of the one infinite mind.
It's clear to any one with an ounce of clarity of mind that all thought is triggered by preceding thought which when believed gives rise to the illusory continuity of the ''I thought'' ... that being a fictional dream within pure awareness the dreamer.
Dontaskme, your last three or four posts suggest that you have completely abandoned the secure ledge of reality. Your posts make sense only syntactically, but your messages reflect nothing more than jumbled thoughts.
Why do you do this? Is this a part of some agenda, or you really lost some sure footing on the very basis of your thoughts?
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Tue Jun 26, 2018 6:31 am
That which is aware of time passing never moves. It observes movement while it itself is timeless and motionless.
Only the mind aka “thought” moves not you. You being the awareness.
Time therefore is an illusory appearance of the real.
.
The infinite here now cannot experience itself, it is the experiencing. .time and space is a frame by frame experience in it.
.
Dontaskme wrote:
It matters not whether a concept arises as an animate or inanimate object
Dontaskme wrote:
The paradox has already been explained - it's a myth, there is no paradox in reality, reality is not in relationship with any thing. Things are thoughts which are illusory fictitious appearances of the one infinite mind.
It's clear to any one with an ounce of clarity of mind that all thought is triggered by preceding thought which when believed gives rise to the illusory continuity of the ''I thought'' ... that being a fictional dream within pure awareness the dreamer.
Dontaskme, your last three or four posts suggest that you have completely abandoned the secure ledge of reality. Your posts make sense only syntactically, but your messages reflect nothing more than jumbled thoughts.
Why do you do this? Is this a part of some agenda, or you really lost some sure footing on the very basis of your thoughts?
The truth that is Reality is irrefutable..so you’re response is about as useful to my natural intelligence as trying to empty the whole of the Pacific Ocean using a thimble.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Tue Jun 26, 2018 1:29 pm
The truth that is Reality is irrefutable..so you’re response is about as useful to my natural intelligence as trying to empty the whole of the Pacific Ocean using a thimble.
.
There is a hint of St. Paul there somewhere... thanks for hinting at the source of your inspiration to act and speak insanely.
Now, as a test, can you say the same thing in the language of the birds?
Illusory or not, you have to wait for it since you are trapped in it.
This would only apply to the “I thought” the sense of separation. Which is an illusion appearing in awareness which never waits or moves and is unbounded freedom in every moment.
So that which appears to be trapped or appears to wait, never waited, or felt trapped.
It’s not a paradox because that’s simply another appearance of the one reality..aka awareness...aware of itself as the multitude, and the idea of paradox is simply an illusory temporal appearance of the eternal aka infinity aka now..or what ever you want to call.
