Presented Argument:
1) Unity observes reality as strictly a self-mirroring cause through which all extensions of the 1 are merely effects as approximations of this unity in itself. These effects in themselves are further causes so what we understand of Unity is merely a causality through structure in which this structure through effect manifests reality as one through a mirror effect that is infinite in both form and function. Hence Unity is causality through mirroring in which any percieved multiplicity is approximation akin to "randomness" as the limit of unity. Unity can be summated as a mirror effect through causality and randomness.
2) Multiplicity is the relations of parts which exist through further parts with these parts being an approximation of unity through movement as time. These parts are both active, localized as parts, and passive, unlocalized potential parts. These active parts move through the potential parts, with the potential parts being the negative barrier through which the actual parts move. The actual parts, which move through the negative barrier as potential parts, allows the potential movement to exist where the relation of the "actual parts" form the angulature of space through which the active may move. In these respect active parts relating provide the barrier of potential parts in which they move, much in the same manner two relative lines create a negative barrier as the "interior of the angle", through which the actual lines may move. In these respects, multiplicity can be observed as a form of relational ism where the parts, premised at the core being "linear dimensions", must continually fold an relate through each other in zero dimensional space in order to exist as being through movement amidst nothingness.
3) Unity being the summation of multiplicity, and multiplicity being the approximation of unity observes a dualism of no-movement and movement which synthesizes a neutral element as "dimensions". These dimensions are strictly spatial boundaries (both abstract and physical) which give structure to reality as reality itself. In this manner dimensions are merely medians for further dimensions, through a continual produce of synthesis, and can be interpreted as "symbols" or "axioms" in themselves considering a dimension as a structured (hence measured reality) is inseperable from consciousness itself. For example can a line be observed as either empirical or abstract? Most likely both with the line being both and neither, or inherently "neutral" grounds through which reality manifests itself. In these respects this "dimensional synthesis", as the triadic part of the dualism of unity/multiplicity maintains in itself a dualism of the "limits" which give boundary to reality and the "no-limits" (as possible limits) through which limits both begin and end. In this manner synthesis is a triadic nature of dimensions through limits and no-limits.
Unity and Multiplicity
Re: Unity and Multiplicity
Huh? Surely there is an easier way to say the same thing.
Re: Unity and Multiplicity
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 23, 2018 5:29 pm Presented Argument:
1) Unity observes reality as strictly a self-mirroring cause through which all extensions of the 1 are merely effects as approximations of this unity in itself. These effects in themselves are further causes so what we understand of Unity is merely a causality through structure in which this structure through effect manifests reality as one through a mirror effect that is infinite in both form and function. Hence Unity is causality through mirroring in which any percieved multiplicity is approximation akin to "randomness" as the limit of unity. Unity can be summated as a mirror effect through causality and randomness.
1) Unity observes reality as strictly a self-mirroring cause through which all extensions of the 1 are merely effects as approximations of this unity in itself. These effects in themselves are further causes so what we understand of Unity is merely a causality through structure in which this structure through effect manifests reality as one through a mirror effect that is infinite in both form and function. Hence Unity is causality through mirroring in which any perceived multiplicity is approximation akin to "randomness" as the limit of unity. Unity can be summated as a mirror effect through causality and randomness.
1a) All cause and effect is an observation of boundaries, with these boundaries in themselves being founded in space at both the abstract and physical level.
1b) With all cause and effect extending from space, as a foundation for all boundaries, the observation of a mirror effect (as replicative symmetry) observes a movement of space through repetition. Space and movement are inseparable as space exists if and only if there are boundaries to form it, with these boundaries in themselves being composed of space. Space and movement, under these terms, are synonymous.
1c) Cause and effect existing through movement under a mirror effect observes cause and effect having direction qualities in the respect they are directed. Movement cannot exist without direction as movement is direction.
1d) Considering all cause manifests itself through effect, with all effect being a cause in itself, causality is unified through its own movement through itself. Considering all cause projects itself through effect as a further cause, causality is unified under an intradimensional structure.
1f) If all causality is directed into itself through itself, this would imply some deficiency in the cause itself as direction implies a degree of movement with this movement having an actual (localized) and potential (non-localized) nature. In simpler terms something cannot move unless there is something or somewhere to move too.
1g) However as all effect is an extension of a cause, with the cause moving itself through itself, and any percieve multiplicity of the whole cause in itself being an approximation of the whole cause, the cause in itself is unified under the effect as merely an approximation (yet extension of the cause; therefore cause itself). In simpler terms the effect is the limit of the cause as a cause in itself; hence cause is its own limit.
1h) Cause as its own limit, with this cause being spatial direction observes the cause as fundamentally 1 dimensional. Instinct first implies all cause and effect to have a strictly linear structure, however the extradimensional nature of the line as projecting away from its own source causes a contradiction in terms considering cause moves through itself as itself.
1i) Any linear structure, summated under that which is extradimensional, requires further lines to relate towards and through. This would require the lines to "fold" through themselves with any "actual" line (being a localized form of spatial direction) existing if and only if their is potential space through which the line can fold (non-localized space). This requires the line to exist as a part which must relate to other parts and an inherent deficiency occurs in "actualization" (hence unity) as a "potential" space must exist which in itself is non-localized hence "non-being". The line, considering its must exist through further lines, in itself is a part or unit hence observes multiplicity.
1j) If causality is viewed under a unified whole, this multiplicity observed under the nature of extra dimensional is merely an approximation of this whole, hence is not the whole in itself. In these respects, the origin of all boundaries is intra dimensional in the respect it is directed through itself as itself with no division.
1k) This unity, lacking in any multiplicity, is not finite considering what is finite (as a perceived multiplicity) exists through relations to other finite realities. This unity has nothing to relate to as it cannot relate as a part of a whole, considering it is the whole. In a separate respect this unity is the foundation for limit, but not limit in itself, considering limit observes in one respect a "deficiency". This unity is infinite, or lacking in limit as deficiency, as pure dimensionality.
1l) Considering the extra dimensional nature of the line observes a multiplicity as a unit which must relate to further units, this unified whole contains as an approximation but is not limited to the line.
1m) Considering this unity as pure "movement as direction" contains no deficiency due to its infinite nature, it has no form in one respect as it has not limit except pure randomness as deficiency. Yet paradoxically it contains spatial dimensions in the respect it is intradimensional and is pure direction as movement.
1n) The one cause as both form and no form, at the same time in different respects, can only be summated under spatial terms as a 1 dimensional point that exists through itself as itself.
1o) All existence occurring through this one dimensional point, observes a multiplicity in forms as approximation of the whole, as strictly imaginary in the respect it is an "image" or "symbol" which is an extension of further symbols. This approximation, as a limit, occurs as a negative dimensional boundary, which exists dually to the 1 dimensional line as a dimension that does not exist on its own terms but rather as an observation of a perceived connection.
1p) Considering the 1d point has no deficiency, and any forms are merely extensions of this one cause, with the forms themselves being composed of parts which in turn are further extensions of this one cause, the negative dimensional boundary as a -1d line observes a percieved approximation of forms as a foundational structure (much in the same manner the line is a foundational structure) of approximation.
1q) The -1d line observes a connection between objects where the 1d line cannot observe this connection considering the 0d points its "extends" (if that is the correct word) between are not phenomena in and of themselves. As a connection between 1d points (which exist as a 1d point), this -1d line is an approximation of unity as a limit akin to randomness as a deficiency in structure. The -1d line as a deficiency is akin to randomness.
2) Multiplicity is the relations of parts which exist through further parts with these parts being an approximation of unity through movement as time. These parts are both active, localized as parts, and passive, unlocalized potential parts. These active parts move through the potential parts, with the potential parts being the negative barrier through which the actual parts move. The actual parts, which move through the negative barrier as potential parts, allows the potential movement to exist where the relation of the "actual parts" form the angulature of space through which the active may move. In these respect active parts relating provide the barrier of potential parts in which they move, much in the same manner two relative lines create a negative barrier as the "interior of the angle", through which the actual lines may move. In these respects, multiplicity can be observed as a form of relational ism where the parts, premised at the core being "linear dimensions", must continually fold an relate through each other in zero dimensional space in order to exist as being through movement amidst nothingness.
2a) All parts are both composed of parts and compose other parts.
2b) These parts exist as the boundaries through which further external and internal parts move.
2c) All parts, considering they are both composed of parts and compose further parts, act as:
2c1) The movement of the parts they are composed of, hence are a localization of actual relations
to the parts which compose them. In these respects, as a summation of moving parts, the part is
in itself actualized movement. Actuality can be observed as a boundary which forms a reality
through its position in space (or locality). The definition of "actuality" and "locality", under these
terms is synonymous and maintain a circulatory nature.
2c2) The movement of the parts they composed, hence are a localization of actual relations to the
parts which they compose. In these respects, as a derivative of a larger part, the part exists
through its relation to further parts with these relations in turn allows this part, as a derivative, to
exist. Actuality can be observed as a boundary of movement through relation which forms a
reality by its relations as positions relative to other parts (or locality). Locality is a position of a
part which exists through its relations to further parts, which these relations in themselves being
movements.
2c3) All positions of a part in space as a space, in themselves are movements considering a
a position (or locality) in itself is actualized by the movements which it is both composed of and
composes. A position hence is a medial point of movement in the respect that all internal and
external movements manifest it as a potential locality in one respect as it is potential unity from
which a whole is derived from while simultaneously a potential unity through which multiple parts
summate under as a group of relations.
2c4) All positions of space, as a locality which composes a part for what it is as a part, maintain a
nature of actual movement in the respect that are a localization of relations which exist if and only
if they relate to further parts which are actual movements as the localization of relations. They
simultaneously maintain a dual potential nature as observed in point "2c3" in one respect, while
acting as a further negative barrier of non-localized potentiality for other actual movements to exist
through and from. A locality, as a part through position as a movement, maintains an inherent lack
of form in the respect that it cannot exist on its own terms.
2d) As boundaries which form the parts are parts in themselves and must relate to eachother, through
movements with these movements, as relations, necessitating an inherent element of "direction".
Movement cannot exist unless it is directed, and what is directed requires movement hence direction
is a form in itself as a boundary.
2e) Boundaries, having an inherent directional nature, are dimensions in themselves considering they give
form through an inherent division of a property into multiple parts or by observing division of
"nothingness" as an act of movement through a void in which being, through movement, occurs.
2f) The boundary as a dimension is the base unit from which all form are both summated and derived. As
a unit the dimension takes on a quantitative nature of 1 and qualitatively a nature of spatial direction.
In this manner the boundary is based under a unit of 1 dimension as 1 direction.
2g) The boundaries which give structure to all forms are based upon a 1 dimensional nature. Considering
these boundaries act as parts which are both composed of parts and compose further parts (as the
boundary is both composed of and composed other boundaries) they exist through relations.
2h) The 1 dimensional boundary, as a unit of relation that exists through relation as relation by an inherent
multiplicity can be observed as movement through direction. Considering this movement as direction,
exists through relation of further movements as directions, this 1 dimensional boundary must be
extra dimensional in nature considering it must project past itself through the relations necessary to
maintain it.
2h1) All parts exist if and only if they relate to another part past itself. Any form of self-relation of
the part, considering a part cannot exist on its own terms, would cause the part to individuate
into further parts through a simultaneous act of multiplication and division through which the
part could relate as parts, hence exist through movement. In these respects the part, must
maintain an extradimensional nature of projecting, or "being directed", pasts its origins if it is
to move, hence "exist".
2i) The 1 dimensional boundary, as extra dimensional, must premise its existence the base unit of the line
as extradimensional space which exists as a unit.
2j) The line as the base unit of all boundaries and forms, exists through a process of folding through itself
in 0d space to form the line as a micro angle in one respect while existing as a localized "line" itself at
the macro level whose relations, through folding itself as itself, manifest the "angle" as potential locality
in which the line moves. The line exists through a process of folding, with this folding process
inseparable from the abstract and physical properties it not just defines but manifests. The line is a
conscious form of measurement in the respect it continually measures itself through itself, in the
process creating forms, and is a foundational structure of consciousness
3) Unity being the summation of multiplicity, and multiplicity being the approximation of unity observes a dualism of no-movement and movement which synthesizes a neutral element as "dimensions". These dimensions are strictly spatial boundaries (both abstract and physical) which give structure to reality as reality itself. In this manner dimensions are merely medians for further dimensions, through a continual produce of synthesis, and can be interpreted as "symbols" or "axioms" in themselves considering a dimension as a structured (hence measured reality) is inseperable from consciousness itself. For example can a line be observed as either empirical or abstract? Most likely both with the line being both and neither, or inherently "neutral" grounds through which reality manifests itself. In these respects this "dimensional synthesis", as the triadic part of the dualism of unity/multiplicity maintains in itself a dualism of the "limits" which give boundary to reality and the "no-limits" (as possible limits) through which limits both begin and end. In this manner synthesis is a triadic nature of dimensions through limits and no-limits.