Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Sat Mar 03, 2018 9:54 pm
There's a sales philosophy that says you must control the conversation to be successful at selling.
Based on experience and plenty of testing, I say bull to the disproven idea. Logic says that a true conversation entails freedom of speech, not control and manipulation.
You can't force anyone to agree, that must come from within, not without.
My sales motto which contains my philosophy is
"The more I sell, the less I sell and the less I sell, the more I sell." I leave it to you to figure out exactly what I mean in its many implications.
PhilX
I would have to respectfully agree with everything you've mentioned here.. And, while, as mentioned in the following comments of the original post, a 'smooth talker' who applies certain sales 'tactics', and does so with a certain knack for selling, can absolutely be beneficial to your success with making the sell, none of those tactics or 'smooth talking' should be done with manipulative or deceptive intent - such as to attempt to outright 'control' the conversation.
As well, I would like to mention that these scenarios in which gaffo is eluding to, are likely the selling of material and / or monetary product(s). And the relevance in that would be that, I find the discussion between what the original poster is suggesting upon the sell of information, ideas and / or beliefs in philosophy and the sell of materialistic items to be two, very different discussions; even greater is that which are the many differences in their highly numerous implications.
In conclusion.. I would like to say that 'smooth talking' and sales tactics or strategies are predominantly, if at all, beneficial in the material world. While the philosophical adaptation of this, I find, would reap little to no benefits, and likely only become hindered, by the inclusion of any 'smooth talking', tactics, manipulation or otherwise. And this, obviously, due to the strong desire felt by the prospect for the speaker (salesman) to be forcing the idea or forcing the convincing of said idea, upon them - something that is not a pretty color on anyone within' the realm of philosophic discussion.