How did spirituality, belief in God and the continuing search for God change you?

[Eodnhoj7]

In the book of Revelation, Babylon is ancient Rome. The basis of all evil is our institutions, whether in ancient Rome, Cincinnati, or anywhere else in the world, under the direction of false prophets and Sally Sue (sweet Satan):

When you're in Cincinnati
Going north on Vine
Till you're out in the boonies
And across the line,
Just follow that crowd
Till you see the sign
Of Club Ouzo No. 9.

I met a girl there,
Her name is Sally Sue.
If she asks you to play,
You better know what to do,
'Cause when she takes out her cards,
You're going to get a new view
Of Club Ouzo No. 9.

She made a bid of one 7,
I came back with an 8.
Then she bid two of something,
And I knew I could wait.
When she got up to three,
I knew it might be too late
At Club Ouzo No. 9.

I doubled at 5's,
But 6 was her goal.
I played for her heart,
But she wanted my soul.
That's all I had left,
And she collected the toll
At Club Ouzo No. 9.

I'm feelin' fine,
Gimme some wine.
My head was spinning,
And I don't even drink.

Quote me where that verse is in scripture.

[bobevenson]

Please, as I've said on numerous occasions, the first 65 books of the Bible are merely wrapping paper for Revelation, the 66th, an Ouzo combination adding up to "mankind" in English gematria simplex (A=1 to Z=26).

[Eodnhoj7]

Please, as I've said on numerous occasions, the first 65 books of the Bible are merely wrapping paper for Revelation, the 66th, an Ouzo combination adding up to "mankind" in English gematria simplex (A=1 to Z=26).

But revelation is scripture, and that "poem" is not inside it.

You have not given any argument as too why they are "wrapping paper". Your'e argument is "x, y, z" because I am Bob Evenson. You have given no scriptural verse in regards to connecting cincinatti and babylon, but rather a poem you wrote. However you claim all things made by man are evil, so by default your poem is wrong.

You claim it is all gematria, however show no calculations.

Show me how the gematria is added up then, otherwise you have no mystical credentials. The reason for this, is that credentials are meant as proof of knowledge, nothing more or less. You have not shown any.

[bobevenson]

Please, as I've said on numerous occasions, the first 65 books of the Bible are merely wrapping paper for Revelation, the 66th, an Ouzo combination adding up to "mankind" in English gematria simplex (A=1 to Z=26).

But revelation is scripture, and that "poem" is not inside it.

You have not given any argument as too why they are "wrapping paper". Your'e argument is "x, y, z" because I am Bob Evenson. You have given no scriptural verse in regards to connecting cincinatti and babylon, but rather a poem you wrote. However you claim all things made by man are evil, so by default your poem is wrong.

You claim it is all gematria, however show no calculations.

Show me how the gematria is added up then, otherwise you have no mystical credentials. The reason for this, is that credentials are meant as proof of knowledge, nothing more or less. You have not shown any.

I guess I don't quite understand your response. As far as English gematria simplex, the letters m-a-n-k-I-n-d add up to 66. The prophet John on the isle of Patmos wrote the book of Revelation in 96AD. The prophet Bob the Baptist in Cincinnati, being the only person on Earth who has ever understood the book of Revelation, wrote the paper "The Ouzo Prophecy" to properly interpret the 666 of Revelation 13:18. For your spiritual edification, only the KJV edited prior to 1947 is valid. Later editions dropped the "e" in the word "Nicolaitanes". Christ said he hates the deeds and doctrine of the Nicolaitanes. Nicolaitanes is an anagram for "O satanic line," a reference to the beast line of the Ouzo Cross. Anagrams are related to gematria in that both are number/letter codes, gematria being based on cardinal numbers and anagrams on ordinal numbers.

[Eodnhoj7]

Please, as I've said on numerous occasions, the first 65 books of the Bible are merely wrapping paper for Revelation, the 66th, an Ouzo combination adding up to "mankind" in English gematria simplex (A=1 to Z=26).

But revelation is scripture, and that "poem" is not inside it.

You have not given any argument as too why they are "wrapping paper". Your'e argument is "x, y, z" because I am Bob Evenson. You have given no scriptural verse in regards to connecting cincinatti and babylon, but rather a poem you wrote. However you claim all things made by man are evil, so by default your poem is wrong.

You claim it is all gematria, however show no calculations.

Show me how the gematria is added up then, otherwise you have no mystical credentials. The reason for this, is that credentials are meant as proof of knowledge, nothing more or less. You have not shown any.

I guess I don't quite understand your response. As far as English gematria simplex, the letters m-a-n-k-I-n-d add up to 66.
But what of "Man"? What other words add up to 66 according to the english gematria? Considering the book of Revelation is the center piece of scripture, as you say, it may well be interpreted that genesis is actually the 66th book, considering it is the "wrapping paper". Which is prequisite, the gift or the wrapping paper?

The prophet John on the isle of Patmos wrote the book of Revelation in 96AD. The prophet Bob the Baptist in Cincinnati, being the only person on Earth who has ever understood the book of Revelation, wrote the paper "The Ouzo Prophecy" to properly interpret the 666 of Revelation 13:18.
This is not a statement of proof, but a statement claiming you are correct. Proof is the observation of structure, in which one observe the reflective properties of elements, which in turn form a symmetry through which we see order.



For your spiritual edification, only the KJV edited prior to 1947 is valid. Later editions dropped the "e" in the word "Nicolaitanes". Christ said he hates the deeds and doctrine of the Nicolaitanes. Nicolaitanes is an anagram for "O satanic line," a reference to the beast line of the Ouzo Cross. Anagrams are related to gematria in that both are number/letter codes, gematria being based on cardinal numbers and anagrams on ordinal numbers.

They found anagrams in moby dick also. Certain speach processes, have been found to a have a multidimensional nature. Take for existence reversals of recordings on records. In these respects, their is always a subliminal language underneath the language we observe at face value. The gematria does not prove or disprove anything, other than language is multidimensional.

Does that mean the book of revelation was not valid until the king james version?

[bobevenson]

Does that mean the book of revelation was not valid until the king james version?

The book of Revelation was written in Greek, and the KJV in English is the divinely inspired translation.

[Eodnhoj7]

Does that mean the book of revelation was not valid until the king james version?

The book of Revelation was written in Greek, and the KJV in English is the divinely inspired translation.

Why? Because certain words have an extra "e"? If english languages changes over time, and by all accounts it does (spelling, punctuation, etc.) does that mean the original language is better than the current one because of it's Gematria?

[bobevenson]

Does that mean the book of revelation was not valid until the king james version?

The book of Revelation was written in Greek, and the KJV in English is the divinely inspired translation.

Why? Because certain words have an extra "e"? If english languages changes over time, and by all accounts it does (spelling, punctuation, etc.) does that mean the original language is better than the current one because of it's Gematria?

Actually, the original KJV edition spelled Nicolaitanes without the letter "e," and future editions spelled it either with or without the "e," like a flashing beacon as to its allegorical nature.

[Eodnhoj7]

The book of Revelation was written in Greek, and the KJV in English is the divinely inspired translation.

Why? Because certain words have an extra "e"? If english languages changes over time, and by all accounts it does (spelling, punctuation, etc.) does that mean the original language is better than the current one because of it's Gematria?

Actually, the original KJV edition spelled Nicolaitanes without the letter "e," and future editions spelled it either with or without the "e," like a flashing beacon as to its allegorical nature.

So it's legitimacy is determined by its ability to reflect a "gematria"?

[bobevenson]

There are two words original to the book of Revelation, Nicolaitanes and Armageddon. I have already discussed Nicolaitanes. Armageddon, the site of the final battle between good and evil, is an anagram for Dame Dragon, a generalized personification of evil, similar to other generalized personifications like Mother Nature and Lady Luck.

[Eodnhoj7]

There are two words original to the book of Revelation, Nicolaitanes and Armageddon. I have already discussed Nicolaitanes. Armageddon, the site of the final battle between good and evil, is an anagram for Dame Dragon, a generalized personification of evil, similar to other generalized personifications like Mother Nature and Lady Luck.

If they are original, they by default they would reflect changes within a culture's language as mirrors of that culture. These translations are a reflection of the cultures view on language, and in these respects certain gematria's are in a constant state of movement.

Is the 1947 KJV Bible justified because it contains a seperate gematria from others? Which gematria supersedes the other?

[bobevenson]

In classical Greek gematria, the Greek form of Jesus, Iesous, adds up to 888, one above the mystical perfection of 777. In English gematria simplex (A=1 to Z=26) Iesous adds up to 88 and provides a mystical connection with our past.

[Eodnhoj7]

In classical Greek gematria, the Greek form of Jesus, Iesous, adds up to 888, one above the mystical perfection of 777. In English gematria simplex (A=1 to Z=26) Iesous adds up to 88 and provides a mystical connection with our past.

Iesous is greek however, not English. What does Jesus equal in English?

[bobevenson]

In classical Greek gematria, the Greek form of Jesus, Iesous, adds up to 888, one above the mystical perfection of 777. In English gematria simplex (A=1 to Z=26) Iesous adds up to 88 and provides a mystical connection with our past.

Iesous is greek however, not English. What does Jesus equal in English?

The Holy Trinity is Holy Spirit (equals 151), Jesus Christ (equals 151) and Ouzo Cross (equals 151). If Satan (equals 55) takes the place of the Ouzo Cross, the total adds up to "The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse" described in Chapter 6 of Revelation. Now I ask you, who but a divinely inspired prophet could possibly come up with this?

[Eodnhoj7]

In classical Greek gematria, the Greek form of Jesus, Iesous, adds up to 888, one above the mystical perfection of 777. In English gematria simplex (A=1 to Z=26) Iesous adds up to 88 and provides a mystical connection with our past.

Iesous is greek however, not English. What does Jesus equal in English?

The Holy Trinity is Holy Spirit (equals 151), Jesus Christ (equals 151) and Ouzo Cross (equals 151). If Satan (equals 55) takes the place of the Ouzo Cross, the total adds up to "The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse" described in Chapter 6 of Revelation.

"Father", Son and Holy Spirit....Not Ouzo Cross, Son and Holy Spirit. What does Father Equal?