Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Disable your ad blocker to continue using our website.
davidm wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2017 7:30 pm
Those weren't ad hominems. They were straight-up descriptions of you.
And yes, they trouble you. Fundy christians are very thin-skinned.
True enough. Some of the nutjobs here get very shirty if you disagree with them. Mr Can won't even talk to me.
...is there any point in talking to a nut-job once confirmed yet such appear to be the favored correspondents as the number of accumulated pages attest. These nut-jobs certainly know how to keep a conversation going better than anyone.
Dubious wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2017 9:24 pm...is there any point in talking to a nut-job once confirmed...
Who? Me or Mr Can? Actually, I know perfectly well that Mr Can, and several others, have absolutely no intention giving any credence to ideas that challenge their own. But it's quite useful to rehearse and refine arguments that might be taken seriously by people who still have some grip on reality.
Dubious wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2017 9:24 pm...yet such appear to be the favored correspondents as the number of accumulated pages attest. These nut-jobs certainly know how to keep a conversation going better than anyone.
Dubious wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2017 9:24 pm...is there any point in talking to a nut-job once confirmed...
uwot wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2017 9:54 pmWho? Me or Mr Can?
You should have completed that question with an
Dubious wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2017 9:24 pm...yet such appear to be the favored correspondents as the number of accumulated pages attest. These nut-jobs certainly know how to keep a conversation going better than anyone.
Well, it takes two to tango.
True! But that only works if both know how to dance otherwise you might as well get paid for sore feet or a very frustrated mind!
