Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Disable your ad blocker to continue using our website.
bobevenson wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:18 pm...he's the only person on Earth who has ever admitted to even understanding the paper
If anything, that would put his credibility greatly into question. By concluding what you want to assume his opinions to be, and elevating him in a way that suits you, you are claiming validation for your delusions, rather than considering or reaching any other conclusions which would be much more reasonable.
You dismiss the much larger volume of consistent feedback that you don't like. So there is no balanced perspective or truth in what you claim as "proof".
bobevenson wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:18 pm...he's the only person on Earth who has ever admitted to even understanding the paper
If anything, that would put his credibility greatly into question.
Please, he was the spokesman for the Spiritual Counterfeits Project, an ultra-conservative Biblical organization whose sole function is to alert the public to spiritual scams. The fact that he would even read "The Ouzo Prophecy," much less be blown away by it, undoubtedly is the result of divine intervention on my behalf.
bobevenson wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2017 12:24 pmPlease, he was the spokesman for the Spiritual Counterfeits Project, an ultra-conservative Biblical organization whose sole function is to alert the public to spiritual scams. The fact that he would even read "The Ouzo Prophecy," much less be blown away by it, undoubtedly is the result of divine intervention on my behalf.
Doesn't mean anything. You're ascribing what you want. You've demonstrated nothing. There would be much more to show for it if it was anything other than a tired old delusion you're drunk with.
Why do you dismiss the much larger volume of consistent feedback that you don't like? Do you not recognize that as divine direction?
bobevenson wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2017 12:24 pmPlease, he was the spokesman for the Spiritual Counterfeits Project, an ultra-conservative Biblical organization whose sole function is to alert the public to spiritual scams. The fact that he would even read "The Ouzo Prophecy," much less be blown away by it, undoubtedly is the result of divine intervention on my behalf.
Doesn't mean anything. You're ascribing what you want. You've demonstrated nothing. There would be much more to show for it if it was anything other than a tired old delusion you're drunk with.
Why do you dismiss the much larger volume of consistent feedback that you don't like? Do you not recognize that as divine direction?
Lacey,
I think that when "Bob the Baptist" was baptized, he was held under water for too long.
bobevenson wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2017 12:24 pmPlease, he was the spokesman for the Spiritual Counterfeits Project, an ultra-conservative Biblical organization whose sole function is to alert the public to spiritual scams. The fact that he would even read "The Ouzo Prophecy," much less be blown away by it, undoubtedly is the result of divine intervention on my behalf.
Doesn't mean anything. You're ascribing what you want. You've demonstrated nothing. There would be much more to show for it if it was anything other than a tired old delusion you're drunk with.
Why do you dismiss the much larger volume of consistent feedback that you don't like? Do you not recognize that as divine direction?
Sorry, under normal circumstances, feedback would be 100% negative. The single ultra-positive reply from somebody who wouldn't write such a letter in a million years is proof-positive that it must have been divinely inspired. You simply can't see that individual tree for the forest.
...Good one