To see his name in print, this is one of the few forums that will tolerate him.
Since he doesn't engage with other people's views and challenges, and seeks constant recognition for himself and his rants rather than any authentic value or appreciation for others, I'd say he is here to stroke himself in public.
Thanks Bob!
He's comprehensively mad and the alternative for him is to stand out in the cold at some bus stop telling everyone he's a prophet and getting even less human interaction than he does on the wibblies.
Then you must also consider the spokesman for the ultra-conservative biblical organization, the Spiritual Counterfeits Project, to be equally mad since after reading "The Ouzo Prophecy," he wrote, "What can I say? Your argument is fascinating, tightly-reasoned, for sure. But I have to wonder, is it true?"
You don't think he was being just a teensy bit flippant? On the other hand that's probably crediting him with too much insight, as an 'ultra-conservative bible basher'.bobevenson wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:59 pmThen you must also consider the spokesman for the ultra-conservative biblical organization, the Spiritual Counterfeits Project, to be equally mad since after reading "The Ouzo Prophecy," he wrote, "What can I say? Your argument is fascinating, tightly-reasoned, for sure. But I have to wonder, is it true?"
I can understand why you simply cannot believe he was 100% serious since he's the only person on Earth who has ever admitted to even understanding the paper, and his absolutely unbelievable letter to me was apparently divine intervention for my spiritual edification.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:02 pmYou don't think he was being just a teensy bit flippant? On the other had that's probably giving him too much credence.bobevenson wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:59 pmThen you must also consider the spokesman for the ultra-conservative biblical organization, the Spiritual Counterfeits Project, to be equally mad since after reading "The Ouzo Prophecy," he wrote, "What can I say? Your argument is fascinating, tightly-reasoned, for sure. But I have to wonder, is it true?"
He was probably sane - you can tell by the fact that he immediately forgot all about you.bobevenson wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:59 pmThen you must also consider the spokesman for the ultra-conservative biblical organization, the Spiritual Counterfeits Project, to be equally mad since after reading "The Ouzo Prophecy," he wrote, "What can I say? Your argument is fascinating, tightly-reasoned, for sure. But I have to wonder, is it true?"
An excellent suggestion for you. Problem is, which ones do you have left to try?bobevenson wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:39 pm From a philosophical standpoint, it looks like you can't accept reality. Maybe you should try another forum.
We wonder how delusional you are compared with Bob?vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 11:33 pm I wonder whatever gave Philex the idea that he is more sane than bobevenson?
As a matter of fact I consider myself to be quite insane, which makes me the sanest person on here.Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 11:37 pmWe wonder how delusional you are compared with Bob?vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2017 11:33 pm I wonder whatever gave Philex the idea that he is more sane than bobevenson?
PhilX
