Science Fan wrote: ↑Wed May 31, 2017 8:06 pmWell, the anti-science lobby that promotes the fallacy that races are real
I appreciate that for politically correct types "race" is a trigger word. Since I've watched this discussion go on ad nauseam before and the topic I am quite interested in is repatriation for global change, not the race debate, I'll basically leave this alone. I am of course aware that modern race theory is based largely on haplogroups. Thus we can say that the Black Egyptians hypothesis was wrong. The posing of the hypothesis is meaningful to speakers of standard English. The science I read today isn't bigoted, it's simply objective to note that,
""In the ancient Egyptians, we don't find much at all sub-Saharan African ancestry. They look very Near Eastern and almost zero sub-Saharan African ancestry," lead researcher Johannes Krause of the Max Planck Institute for the Science [said]. This is different from today. Today you have something like 10, 15 per cent sub-Saharan African ancestry and this has increased over the last 1,500 years."
Or, we can just use our eyes and look at the Fayum mummy portraits and see that Egyptians weren't Black. There's nothing wrong with taking an interest in human racial diversity, it's very fascinating for people like me who like science, I highly recommend checking out "AnthroScape human biodiversity forum", it's a sophisticated and beautiful exploration of race. What is sad and horrible is what some people have done with their concepts of race. It's also a bit sad when people who are otherwise rational lose their minds to politically correct mumbo-jumbo.
I do however want to quickly acknowledge what you are saying. The idea there is no race comes out of critical theory. The denial of essentialism exists in feminist theory like Simone de Beauvoir where there is no real male or female gender, it's also in Judy Butler where the sexes male and female are denied to exist, in Gayle Rubin and Guy Hocquenghem there is no such thing as the act of sex, in linguistics there is no English language, and so on and so on. The border lines are fuzzy, there are outliers. I agree with all that. And, there are also standards, ideals, norms, models, cores and so on that allow us to use the words even though we are aware of the problematizations.