Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Disable your ad blocker to continue using our website.
Yes, I've noticed your judgement has a tendency to leave you looking rather dim witted.
That's no excuse for you not knowing what you meant.
Yet again Harbal rides into a post, on his donkey, to tilt at windmills, contributing nothing salient to the thread.
This is a philosophy forum, and you are on a thread about the role of women with regard to employment or children. If you have nothing to say on the subject, bugger off and allow people the space to discuss. Have you run out of toilet walls to write on? No friends to play with, so you'd rather make enemies? Go do it elsewhere, unless you actually have something salient to say.
Harbal can say more in one sentence than you can in 100 paragraphs.
As usual, overstating, Does he actually ever put this great skill to any use other than to take the piss out of people?
On the plus side. now that he's got a reference, maybe he can go get a job, because he has f*** all to contribute on any topic on this forum.
Come to think of it, unless you have something salient to say about the subject title, why don't you go join him on the bench?
Actually it's a good question. It's not as if they have to choose between a job or being a dad, or balancing between the two. Or do they? 'House husbands' are growing in numbers and I'm constantly hearing men talk about how they are the ones to get a family meal on the table, of an evening.
Actually it is a bad question, and that is why I asked it. It is just as bad as the idiotic question that began the thread in the first place.
