Er!? Trump did lie about it, live on TV.thedoc wrote:Greta wrote:
So you like it better when they grab and then lie about it?
Hubris and Hillary Clinton
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: Hubris and Hillary Clinton
Re: Hubris and Hillary Clinton
Really, then can you link to the clip of trump lying about grabbing a snatch, and where did Greta get the information that Trump was bragging about it? Bill did so repeatedly on Live TV and to the congress.Arising_uk wrote:Er!? Trump did lie about it, live on TV.thedoc wrote:
So you like it better when they grab and then lie about it?
Re: Hubris and Hillary Clinton
As a woman, I know the difference between having an affair and having a pervert grab at my fanny uninvited.thedoc wrote:So you like it better when they grab and then lie about it?Greta wrote:
I would not like a leader who brags about being able to get away with grabbing women by the snatch. Dealbreaker for me.
Last edited by Greta on Wed Nov 02, 2016 3:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Hubris and Hillary Clinton
I didn't have to read it. I heard the voice clip, as had millions of others.thedoc wrote:Really, then can you link to the clip of trump lying about grabbing a snatch, and where did Greta get the information that Trump was bragging about it? Bill did so repeatedly on Live TV and to the congress.Arising_uk wrote:Er!? Trump did lie about it, live on TV.thedoc wrote:
So you like it better when they grab and then lie about it?
Re: Hubris and Hillary Clinton
More silly simplistic statements to describe realities that were much more complicated.Greta wrote:I would not like a leader who brags about being able to get away with grabbing women by the snatch. Dealbreaker for me.
Besides, a Clinton lead the US to their last surplus. The Clintons appear to be the best economic managers in recent US history.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/4 ... ttle-do-it
As for "grabbing women by the snatch" as a deal breaker does that seem more perverse to you than this...
http://www.marketslant.com/articles/our ... aks-so-far
...methinks, not so!
I wonder how many "Presidents" have done precisely that. When measured in terms of disgusting, Trump is a rank amateur compared to Bill Clinton.
In spite of not agreeing with you on a number of subjects, I always gave you credit for having researched the data you present but now it seems your reading skills and judgement are right in line with Hobbes.
Re: Hubris and Hillary Clinton
It is surprising and smacks of ideology supplanting analysis. Oh well.Dubious wrote:More silly simplistic statements to describe realities that were much more complicated.Greta wrote:I would not like a leader who brags about being able to get away with grabbing women by the snatch. Dealbreaker for me.
Besides, a Clinton lead the US to their last surplus. The Clintons appear to be the best economic managers in recent US history.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/4 ... ttle-do-it
As for "grabbing women by the snatch" as a deal breaker does that seem more perverse to you than this...
http://www.marketslant.com/articles/our ... aks-so-far
...methinks, not so!
I wonder how many "Presidents" have done precisely that. When measured in terms of disgusting, Trump is a rank amateur compared to Bill Clinton.
In spite of not agreeing with you on a number of subjects, I always gave you credit for having researched the data you present but now it seems your reading skills and judgement are right in line with Hobbes.
Credit Newt Gingrich with the economic stability. Clinton fought Gingrich's vision and administrative skills but had no choice other than to go along with Gingrich's plans, and when they came up roses Clinton was there to grab the credit. A true politician, riding the coat-tails of competence, claiming responsibility for the good and blaming others for the bad. Just like Obama trying to grab credit for oil and gas prices.
Situation determines appropriateness. A man in prime living and moving through a world of power, ambition and money encounters situations defining appropriateness that others would not encounter. Regarding lust, Trump seems more like a bestower of opportunity, and not much like a serial power abuser such as Hillary Clinton’s mate.
Gingrich dominates a female while pointing out that the media is obsessed with sex. Check it out, starting at 4:30.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGy5wpY3kMI
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: Hubris and Hillary Clinton
The Clinton Foundation has done some good things. The media has tried to destroy it. They have tried to destroy Hilary. And have failed on both counts.Dubious wrote:,...as usual a Hobbes special of pure undiluted stupidity and ignorance - which doesn't even relate to the article - in spite of being presented with data...of which there's a massive amount on the Hillary character and the Clinton foundation. I wouldn't vote at all given the candidates but if I had to it would be Trump all the way.Hobbes' Choice wrote:Rubbish. That's the usual response from the apathetic and unimaginative.Dubious wrote: Regardless of who, the rich always get richer...as for the rest, you've got it upside down:
What good has Trump ever done? ZERO!
How much money has he made? ZERO
How many bankruptcies has he used to cheat thousands of debtors? FOUR.
How much government money has he used to make himself rich? Billions.
This guy has no policy ideas. He is of limited intelligence and his mind is unstable.
If he's the next President, he could well be the last.
Re: Hubris and Hillary Clinton
Amazing how the lemmings will swim back over the cliff. The Republicans ran up the biggest debt in human history in the space of just eight years after inheriting a surplus. It seems that some are intent on returning to another nightmare of presidential Peter Principle.
I will have to adjust my investments in line with the coming economic maelstrom when Trump loses control as Bush did. Why won't Republicans ever pick their smarter people as leaders? Always ignorant thickhead rednecks. It looks like the world stock market will be weak for years now while Trump inevitably screws everything up and the echoes of his obvious incompetence reverberate around the globe.
I will have to adjust my investments in line with the coming economic maelstrom when Trump loses control as Bush did. Why won't Republicans ever pick their smarter people as leaders? Always ignorant thickhead rednecks. It looks like the world stock market will be weak for years now while Trump inevitably screws everything up and the echoes of his obvious incompetence reverberate around the globe.
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13975
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: Hubris and Hillary Clinton
That's because you can't use right-wing and intelligent in the same sentence. And I don't think Trump is a Republican at all. I don't think he's anything apart from a bloated buffoon who's in love with himself. I think he bit off far more than he could chew. He's not a politician, which is one point in his favour anyway. It would have been interesting to see what he made of the job. Hillary's a bore. Just another warmongering, conniving, lying, hard-as-nails, seasoned political player. Same old same old. And that voice! Four years of that voice. People have a habit of confusing canny politics with intelligence. If intelligence counted then we would have people like Einstein as world leaders. It never happens, and never will.Greta wrote: Why won't Republicans ever pick their smarter people as leaders? Always ignorant thickhead rednecks.
I also think it's true that Trump is actually friends with the Clintons. That's how cynical and rotten politics is. There's nothing 'real' about politicians. I can see how the lizard-aliens in human suits conspiracy-theory started.
Re: Hubris and Hillary Clinton
Well. That was a lot of noise.
What if it’s not that difficult. Could be we peasants have been mesmerized by the smoke and mirrors to hide the temple keys. Sure sounds like it. How could mere mortals aspire to governance?
Obama’s signature legislation, a signature that he carefully drew with a rack of Mont Blanc luxury pens, his signature massive chaos which was railroaded through Congress without a single Republican vote the instant Democrats squeaked out a Congressional majority, is likely a disaster on purpose. The purpose is for government to rescue us from the chaos caused by the greedy corporate insurance companies. Essentially, the purpose is to expand the VA hospital system to include non-vets, and make that the sole source of healthcare for the masses.
The purpose of that is not for improved healthcare or for economic benefit. Power mongers don’t give a hoot in hell about that stuff. It’s for control of the population.
Trump assures us that Obamanation is gone fast if he is elected. He is quite confident about that. How would he accomplish such a thing? His platform says he will ask Congress to repeal the law. He will ask.
Wonder what he means by ask.
If judged by his methods, Trump is no spats-wearing Republican. He’s a ridiculing Progressive.
He speaks colorfully and that attracts the press like an instinct. He’s just the type to go after fence-sitting legislators via the press until they earn the praise of power, like FBI Director Comey.
Much more civilized than executing his opposition.
Donald Trump Praises James Comey "He Did The Right Thing"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Psdzf_HQSk
Trump’s Official Positions
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/positions
What if it’s not that difficult. Could be we peasants have been mesmerized by the smoke and mirrors to hide the temple keys. Sure sounds like it. How could mere mortals aspire to governance?
Obama’s signature legislation, a signature that he carefully drew with a rack of Mont Blanc luxury pens, his signature massive chaos which was railroaded through Congress without a single Republican vote the instant Democrats squeaked out a Congressional majority, is likely a disaster on purpose. The purpose is for government to rescue us from the chaos caused by the greedy corporate insurance companies. Essentially, the purpose is to expand the VA hospital system to include non-vets, and make that the sole source of healthcare for the masses.
The purpose of that is not for improved healthcare or for economic benefit. Power mongers don’t give a hoot in hell about that stuff. It’s for control of the population.
Trump assures us that Obamanation is gone fast if he is elected. He is quite confident about that. How would he accomplish such a thing? His platform says he will ask Congress to repeal the law. He will ask.
Wonder what he means by ask.
If judged by his methods, Trump is no spats-wearing Republican. He’s a ridiculing Progressive.
He speaks colorfully and that attracts the press like an instinct. He’s just the type to go after fence-sitting legislators via the press until they earn the praise of power, like FBI Director Comey.
Much more civilized than executing his opposition.
Donald Trump Praises James Comey "He Did The Right Thing"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Psdzf_HQSk
Trump’s Official Positions
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/positions
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: Hubris and Hillary Clinton
Er!? The first presidential debate where he said he did not demean and degrade women but then the clip came out as did the women?thedoc wrote:Really, then can you link to the clip of trump lying about grabbing a snatch, ...
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13975
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: Hubris and Hillary Clinton
I love the way all the male 'feminists' have gone on a self-righteous rampage, speaking for, and being offended 'on behalf of' women.Arising_uk wrote:Er!? The first presidential debate where he said he did not demean and degrade women but then the clip came out as did the women?thedoc wrote:Really, then can you link to the clip of trump lying about grabbing a snatch, ...
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13975
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: Hubris and Hillary Clinton
I have no idea what 'VA' means, but you have entire hospital systems for veterinarians? What about lawyers? You could use them for vivisection.Walker wrote:Essentially, the purpose is to expand the VA hospital system to include non-vets, and make that the sole source of healthcare for the masses.
Re: Hubris and Hillary Clinton
Summary:
If Hillary wins it's going to be the same old corrupt establishment shit enriching themselves while continuing to erode the middle class.
If Trump it's going to be new shit we're not used to and never expected.
Who's funnier, Cheech or Chong? In either case, the laugh will be on us.
If Hillary wins it's going to be the same old corrupt establishment shit enriching themselves while continuing to erode the middle class.
If Trump it's going to be new shit we're not used to and never expected.
Who's funnier, Cheech or Chong? In either case, the laugh will be on us.
Re: Hubris and Hillary Clinton
That's something that's also been considered. Soon enough we'll know who invites whom to the White House! Is there a greater farce than the subterfuges of politics? If aliens lived on Mars they'd regret being in the same solar system.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: I also think it's true that Trump is actually friends with the Clintons.