The Golden Ratio vs the Rule of Thirds

General chit-chat

Moderators: AMod, iMod

bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: The Golden Ratio vs the Rule of Thirds

Post by bobevenson »

That's the kind of answer expected from an ignorant person who knows nothing about a subject and cares less.
Melchior
Posts: 839
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 3:20 pm

Re: The Golden Ratio vs the Rule of Thirds

Post by Melchior »

Philosophy Explorer wrote:Never studied art and I already know about the Golden Ratio's supposed connection with aesthetics.

This article compares two rules, saying one is better than the other. To me, I think this article's approach to art may be too rigid.

Tell me what you think:

http://petapixel.com/2016/10/24/golden- ... le-thirds/

PhilX
These are merely helpful guides to composition. The key is to avoid 'simple balance'. See:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/ornello/
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: The Golden Ratio vs the Rule of Thirds

Post by Arising_uk »

bobevenson wrote:That's the kind of answer expected from an ignorant person who knows nothing about a subject and cares less.
Would this answer be from an agnostic or an absolute fool bob?
bobevenson wrote:Theist, agnostic, atheist. As Bob the Baptist, I can tell you that the first and third are fools, and absolute fools at that.
bobevenson wrote:Anybody who isn't an agnostic is a fool.
Post Reply