should incest between consenting adults be illegal
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
If two or more adults wanna screw, and they're related in a close way, and they don't advertise it to the world, and they do it behind closed doors, then I don't think law-makers and -enforcers can do diddly squat.
But, they gotta understand, no body wants to pay a dime to care for the pinheaded, retarded, malformed offspring that can issue from from such screwing, so those folks should do the world a favor and wear a glove for the love, a cap for the fap, take a pill for the thrill, or get cut before touching the butt.
But, they gotta understand, no body wants to pay a dime to care for the pinheaded, retarded, malformed offspring that can issue from from such screwing, so those folks should do the world a favor and wear a glove for the love, a cap for the fap, take a pill for the thrill, or get cut before touching the butt.
Re: should incest between consenting adults be illegal
I simply see the good that such a relaxation of laws would do is far, far less that the potential to increase harms, especially if it includes parent/child sex.Terrapin Station wrote:My first question would be this: what research are you basing that on? We should look at the methodology of just how they're assessing occurrence versus identification and conviction.Greta wrote:More importantly, there is a risk of predatory behaviour and exploitation being more difficult to identify and convict.
Re: methodology 1) most sexual abuse and exploitation comes from family members 2) a change in law takes away DNA testing as a tool for convicting family-based sexual abuse. Now Dad can say the sex with his daughter was consensual. Legalising parent/child incest would result in a huge increase in family-based sexual abuse, although it wouldn't seem so because it would be legitimised.
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 4548
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
- Location: NYC Man
Re: should incest between consenting adults be illegal
First off, I asked you what research you were basing the claim "More importantly, there is a risk . . ." on. You've offered no information at all about that.Greta wrote:I simply see the good that such a relaxation of laws would do is far, far less that the potential to increase harms, especially if it includes parent/child sex.Terrapin Station wrote:My first question would be this: what research are you basing that on? We should look at the methodology of just how they're assessing occurrence versus identification and conviction.Greta wrote:More importantly, there is a risk of predatory behaviour and exploitation being more difficult to identify and convict.
Re: methodology 1) most sexual abuse and exploitation comes from family members 2) a change in law takes away DNA testing as a tool for convicting family-based sexual abuse. Now Dad can say the sex with his daughter was consensual. Legalising parent/child incest would result in a huge increase in family-based sexual abuse, although it wouldn't seem so because it would be legitimised.
Secondly, methodology is about how a study was conducted. It's not a set of claims.
Finally, the context of the thread is consenting adults. Is that what you're talking about in your comments above?
Re: should incest between consenting adults be illegal
Sorry, I've said my bit and the issue is not important enough to me to debate possible mitigating factors regarding parents having sexual relationships with their offspring. I don't judge very much but that is really screwed up. I suspect there's be a different reaction if the article was about fathers having relationships with their newly-legal daughters or, especially, their sons.Terrapin Station wrote:First off, I asked you what research you were basing the claim "More importantly, there is a risk . . ." on. You've offered no information at all about that.Greta wrote:I simply see the good that such a relaxation of laws would do is far, far less that the potential to increase harms, especially if it includes parent/child sex.Terrapin Station wrote:My first question would be this: what research are you basing that on? We should look at the methodology of just how they're assessing occurrence versus identification and conviction.
Re: methodology 1) most sexual abuse and exploitation comes from family members 2) a change in law takes away DNA testing as a tool for convicting family-based sexual abuse. Now Dad can say the sex with his daughter was consensual. Legalising parent/child incest would result in a huge increase in family-based sexual abuse, although it wouldn't seem so because it would be legitimised.
Secondly, methodology is about how a study was conducted. It's not a set of claims.
Finally, the context of the thread is consenting adults. Is that what you're talking about in your comments above?
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: should incest between consenting adults be illegal
Generally speaking, though not advisable, the vast majority of offspring from incestuous relationships are perfectly healthy. Problems only occur after extended and repeated inbreeding, or where there is already a genetic problem - which could be the case in no-related mates in any case.
According to anthropology the incest taboo has not come about because of this reason, nor is it natural. Incest has been discouraged for reasons of exogamy being a more effective way of extending family influence and economic power. Even then it have been limited to siblings but cousin marriage has often been encouraged to bolster familiarity in economic relations.
There are many cases where there is no such taboo. And as you will be aware ancient Egypt made brother and sister pairings the norm in higher society.
That is should be illegal where the risks are known is an absurd legacy of Jewish law dating back to a time when nothing at all was known about genetics.
According to anthropology the incest taboo has not come about because of this reason, nor is it natural. Incest has been discouraged for reasons of exogamy being a more effective way of extending family influence and economic power. Even then it have been limited to siblings but cousin marriage has often been encouraged to bolster familiarity in economic relations.
There are many cases where there is no such taboo. And as you will be aware ancient Egypt made brother and sister pairings the norm in higher society.
That is should be illegal where the risks are known is an absurd legacy of Jewish law dating back to a time when nothing at all was known about genetics.
-
MatejValuch
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2016 7:51 am
Re: should incest between consenting adults be illegal
It's a cultural thing, yet a question.
I've been to some places in South America where isolated groups of local tribes practiced what would Westerners would call incest (mostly because of very limited number of men). Yet they considered it absolutely normal, and there were nobody to tell them it was legal/illegal, since such distinction of things they did not know, and did not care for.
But you could see clear mental deformations on the tribe members, so possibly it will lead to self-extermination sooner, or later.
I've been to some places in South America where isolated groups of local tribes practiced what would Westerners would call incest (mostly because of very limited number of men). Yet they considered it absolutely normal, and there were nobody to tell them it was legal/illegal, since such distinction of things they did not know, and did not care for.
But you could see clear mental deformations on the tribe members, so possibly it will lead to self-extermination sooner, or later.
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13975
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: should incest between consenting adults be illegal
What's a 'mental deformation'? That sounds like nonsense, and the American bigot's depiction of the 'in-bred hillbilly' is an urban myth.MatejValuch wrote:It's a cultural thing, yet a question.
I've been to some places in South America where isolated groups of local tribes practiced what would Westerners would call incest (mostly because of very limited number of men). Yet they considered it absolutely normal, and there were nobody to tell them it was legal/illegal, since such distinction of things they did not know, and did not care for.
But you could see clear mental deformations on the tribe members, so possibly it will lead to self-extermination sooner, or later.
- SpheresOfBalance
- Posts: 5725
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:27 pm
- Location: On a Star Dust Metamorphosis
Re: should incest between consenting adults be illegal
When considering any particular interaction between humans, when is harm actually harm?
Of course the answer is that it's only to be decided by those that are participants in any particular interaction.
Unfortunately people really love to tell others what to do and what not to do.
As long as all those involved, come away from the interaction, unharmed in any way, happy, and glad to have been a part of it, then who is to say?
But one absolutely has to keep in mind my revision of the 'golden rule' which compensates for the problems philosophers have found contained within it. My "fundamental social axiom" is that one should always, 'treat others as they would have others treat them, to the extent that, all parties, knowingly agree, at the time."
Of course the answer is that it's only to be decided by those that are participants in any particular interaction.
Unfortunately people really love to tell others what to do and what not to do.
As long as all those involved, come away from the interaction, unharmed in any way, happy, and glad to have been a part of it, then who is to say?
But one absolutely has to keep in mind my revision of the 'golden rule' which compensates for the problems philosophers have found contained within it. My "fundamental social axiom" is that one should always, 'treat others as they would have others treat them, to the extent that, all parties, knowingly agree, at the time."
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13975
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: should incest between consenting adults be illegal
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... broad.html
I think statistically this must happen a lot more than we know. I also don't think it can be called 'incest' when the participants didn't grow up together, or even knew of each other's existence. If a brother and sister grow up in the same household, but both are adopted and not biologically related, would sex between them be incest? It seems to me the word 'incest' is more of a morally judgemental term than a scientific one.
I think statistically this must happen a lot more than we know. I also don't think it can be called 'incest' when the participants didn't grow up together, or even knew of each other's existence. If a brother and sister grow up in the same household, but both are adopted and not biologically related, would sex between them be incest? It seems to me the word 'incest' is more of a morally judgemental term than a scientific one.
Re: should incest between consenting adults be illegal
weak reasoning thereGreta wrote: Re: methodology 1) most sexual abuse and exploitation comes from family members 2) a change in law takes away DNA testing as a tool for convicting family-based sexual abuse. Now Dad can say the sex with his daughter was consensual. Legalising parent/child incest would result in a huge increase in family-based sexual abuse, although it wouldn't seem so because it would be legitimised.
as things stand now, if adult parents and children have sex, they are both equally complicit in breaking the law - the law does not view incest by adults as one person victimizing another - but both committing a crime with the victim being society or something
Re: should incest between consenting adults be illegal
Not at all. Minors are not held responsible for incest, at least in regions with laws that would be considered to be contemporary.Kayla wrote:weak reasoning thereGreta wrote: Re: methodology 1) most sexual abuse and exploitation comes from family members 2) a change in law takes away DNA testing as a tool for convicting family-based sexual abuse. Now Dad can say the sex with his daughter was consensual. Legalising parent/child incest would result in a huge increase in family-based sexual abuse, although it wouldn't seem so because it would be legitimised.
as things stand now, if adult parents and children have sex, they are both equally complicit in breaking the law - the law does not view incest by adults as one person victimizing another - but both committing a crime with the victim being society or something
Re: should incest between consenting adults be illegal
did u read what i wrote?Greta wrote: Not at all. Minors are not held responsible for incest, at least in regions with laws that would be considered to be contemporary.
if an adult parent and an adult child (ie 18+) have sex both are held resposible
there is no assumption in law that one party might be able to pressure the other in this case
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: should incest between consenting adults be illegal
Do you have any examples of the law actually being enforced?Kayla wrote:did u read what i wrote?Greta wrote: Not at all. Minors are not held responsible for incest, at least in regions with laws that would be considered to be contemporary.
if an adult parent and an adult child (ie 18+) have sex both are held responsible
Fact is that we have no way of telling how man times this happens, as the participants are unlikely to confess to an act done in private.
I know of at least one example where no prosecution was made, and this was a father and daughters. The artist Eric Gill.
Despite being above the age of consent it is unlikely I think that the 'girls' did not feel under compulsion as they were dependant on their father for their security.
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: should incest between consenting adults be illegal
did you read the first item in this threadHobbes' Choice wrote: Do you have any examples of the law actually being enforced?