You should have given the blind woman a slap. It's not likely she would have tried to retaliate and, even if she had, she would just as likely have hit someone else, rather than you.Greta wrote:and some blind woman turned on me, spitting "There's a HUMAN BEING in that wheelchair!".
Apologies
Re: Apologies
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13975
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: Apologies
That's not even a complete sentence so stop trying to outdo yourself in a pseud contest.Walker wrote: The clever ones with more wit than half stayed silent as the terrorist-attack narrative telling the story of 911 and the aftermath fashioned from ideology, hindsight, and imagination.
Re: Apologies
Yes, Walker, shut up, you're getting on our nerves.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: That's not even a complete sentence so stop trying to outdo yourself in a pseud contest.
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13975
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: Apologies
I'd like to know how she knew there was a person in the wheelchair.Harbal wrote:You should have given the blind woman a slap. It's not likely she would have tried to retaliate and, even if she had, she would just as likely have hit someone else, rather than you.Greta wrote:and some blind woman turned on me, spitting "There's a HUMAN BEING in that wheelchair!".
Re: Apologies
It was probably just a shot in the dark.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: I'd like to know how she knew there was a person in the wheelchair.
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13975
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: Apologies
lol. It was a great story though. Reminds me of a skit someone like 'Fry and Laurie' would do. Fry would have a brilliant retort of course.Harbal wrote:It was probably just a shot in the dark.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: I'd like to know how she knew there was a person in the wheelchair.
Re: Apologies
Yes, probably very Oscar Wildish.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Fry would have a brilliant retort of course.
Re: Apologies
Sir, I’ll have you know that somehow, I just can’t take you seriously.Harbal wrote:Yes, Walker, shut up, you're getting on our nerves.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: That's not even a complete sentence so stop trying to outdo yourself in a pseud contest.
Because indignation grabbed Greta by the throat she had limited options in following the flow of the moment. Just imagine this. Apologize profusely to the blind lady. Agree with her and join her in commiseration at the sorry state of the world where language can be so devoid of humanity. So sad. Tell her you are ashamed. Thank her for pointing out your error, and vow to the blind one that you will persevere to do better. Marvel that a blind one can see more clearly than one with eyes. Ask her if there is anything that you can do for her, perhaps a cold Dr. Pepper, and before leaving thank her once again for her kindness in helping you to be more mindful to the sensitivity that others may feel for their burdens of loss. If you mean all that from the heart the blind lady will feel lighter in spirit and so will you, and the universe will smile on you both. Like this.
Re: Apologies
It's just a complete sentence in English, though likely more thoughtful than that to which you are accustomed.vegetariantaxidermy wrote:That's not even a complete sentence so stop trying to outdo yourself in a pseud contest.Walker wrote: The clever ones with more wit than half stayed silent as the terrorist-attack narrative telling the story of 911 and the aftermath fashioned from ideology, hindsight, and imagination.
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13975
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: Apologies
It's not. It ends up in the air. It might be a punctuation problem but it's not my job to edit it. Just because something is gibberish doesn't mean it's thoughtful.Walker wrote:It's just a complete sentence in English, though likely more thoughtful than that to which you are accustomed.vegetariantaxidermy wrote:That's not even a complete sentence so stop trying to outdo yourself in a pseud contest.Walker wrote: The clever ones with more wit than half stayed silent as the terrorist-attack narrative telling the story of 911 and the aftermath fashioned from ideology, hindsight, and imagination.
Re: Apologies
vegetariantaxidermy wrote:It's not. It ends up in the air. It might be a punctuation problem but it's not my job to edit it. Just because something is gibberish doesn't mean it's thoughtful.Walker wrote:It's just a complete sentence in English, though likely more thoughtful than that to which you are accustomed.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: That's not even a complete sentence so stop trying to outdo yourself in a pseud contest.
You think it’s wrong but can’t say how other than with an incorrect assertion.
Could be what's wrong is that the sentence doesn't say what you would like it to say.
I think that your difficulty in understanding the sentence lies in the word, "fashioned."
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13975
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: Apologies
''The clever ones with more wit than half stayed silent as the terrorist-attack narrative telling the story of 911 and the aftermath fashioned from ideology, hindsight, and imagination.''Walker wrote:vegetariantaxidermy wrote:It's not. It ends up in the air. It might be a punctuation problem but it's not my job to edit it. Just because something is gibberish doesn't mean it's thoughtful.Walker wrote: It's just a complete sentence in English, though likely more thoughtful than that to which you are accustomed.![]()
You think it’s wrong but can’t say how other than with an incorrect assertion.
Could be what's wrong is that the sentence doesn't say what you would like it to say.
You have no predicate at the end. The clever ones, with more wit than half, stayed silent, as the terrorist-attack narrative telling the story of 11/9, and the aftermath fashioned from ideology, hindsight and imagination, rumbled on/made a lot of noise/blew bubbles...... Unless you are saying the 'terrorist-attack narrative' and 'the aftermath' were 'silent', which would be a bit ridiculous. What exactly ARE you trying to say?
-
Impenitent
- Posts: 5774
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: Apologies
some one told her that she wasn't swatting a piñatavegetariantaxidermy wrote:I'd like to know how she knew there was a person in the wheelchair.
-Imp
-
artisticsolution
- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:38 am
Re: Apologies
Well said, Walker! I agree. And I might like to add...this is such a hard thing to do when you are not prepared to humble yourself. It goes against every instinct we have about the goodness of ourselves. To do the above , without feeling bitter, takes practice. But when you finally get there...you see it is no big deal to admit defeat...and that perhaps it was you who were wrong...not only about the misunderstanding...but also about the thought, "I hate this blind woman."Walker wrote:
Because indignation grabbed Greta by the throat she had limited options in following the flow of the moment. Just imagine this. Apologize profusely to the blind lady. Agree with her and join her in commiseration at the sorry state of the world where language can be so devoid of humanity. So sad. Tell her you are ashamed. Thank her for pointing out your error, and vow to the blind one that you will persevere to do better. Marvel that a blind one can see more clearly than one with eyes. Ask her if there is anything that you can do for her, perhaps a cold Dr. Pepper, and before leaving thank her once again for her kindness in helping you to be more mindful to the sensitivity that others may feel for their burdens of loss. If you mean all that from the heart the blind lady will feel lighter in spirit and so will you, and the universe will smile on you both. Like this.
If you were kind to the person in the wheelchair, Greta (which by the way is very nice)...why not be kind to the bitter blind woman who mistook your statement...who knows what her life has been like? It is easy to be kind to those who give you reward...harder to be kind to those who belittle you or make you out to be the bad guy. But really What is the harm of doing what Walker suggests? (not trying to make you an example....but I just realize I did...I apologize...I don't think poorly of you...really...as I have been there and done that...I'm just saying....exercising the body is alot like exercising the mind. When your body gets stronger it can handle alot more....same with the brain. When you understand where the pain is coming from in others...they can't hurt you...well...not as much. lol
Re: Apologies
Heh, I wasn't kind to the fellow in the wheelchair, just having a chat. I'm not much for being kind to people because of disabilities. EEO. People with disabilities have an equal capacity to be jerks.artisticsolution wrote: If you were kind to the person in the wheelchair, Greta (which by the way is very nice)...why not be kind to the bitter blind woman who mistook your statement...who knows what her life has been like? It is easy to be kind to those who give you reward...harder to be kind to those who belittle you or make you out to be the bad guy. But really What is the harm of doing what Walker suggests? (not trying to make you an example....but I just realize I did...I apologize...I don't think poorly of you...really...as I have been there and done that...I'm just saying....exercising the body is alot like exercising the mind. When your body gets stronger it can handle alot more....same with the brain. When you understand where the pain is coming from in others...they can't hurt you...well...not as much. lol