United States of Blind Denial

[FlashDangerpants]

Such negativity Walker

[Arising_uk]

Arising, if you ever wanted to be involved in a meaningful discussion on philosophy or religion you could do so. ...

I've just done so in response to your troll OP.

But you prefer to become emotional and bask in negativity and blind denial. ...

Why is it you godbotherers are incapable of answering questions. Is it a special disability that makes you blind to sentences ending with question marks?

This thread gives you the opportunity to to emote with all the negativity you can muster without interfering with others desiring more intelligent discussion. So just emote to your heart's content. This is your opportunity.

Told you, unlike you I feel no need to proselytize.

[Nick_A]

FDP wrote:

This can be the thread where nick and Walker store all their bitterness about people not accepting their garbled fantasies as equally valid to properly constructed arguments.

Enjoy your 69 thread boys.

Excellent. The negativity of blind denial must be considered properly constructed arguments by their proponents. Just think for a moment; could the Holocaust have been possible without blind denial of respect for life? Of course not. it always seems logical to its supporters. Appreciate all the negative expressions of blind denial sure to come. They will reveal some things about human nature that may make you shudder.

[Walker]

Such negativity Walker

Only for a tick.

[FlashDangerpants]

Oh Nick and Walker. You created this passive-aggressive thread in order for others to fill it with their negativity. But you have hijacked your own concoction for your own blind denial and negativity.

You silly little men.

[Nick_A]

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:

He's also selectively blind. An annoying, trolling little twit.

This is a good example of passive blind denial. Notice there are no specifics but just attacks from a supposed superior ego. We need a broad variety of such posts on this thread so as to appreciate the scope of blind denial.

[FlashDangerpants]

Hey Nick. If we are doing the selectivity thing. Why did you present the below obviously fake news story?

FDP wrote: Name a place in the USA that is under Sharia law.

http://nationalreport.net/city-michigan ... haria-law/

And why are you so desperate to avoid recognising that only a fool would fall for it?
All you managed was "it's not easy to tell truth from fact" which of course is only true when the thing in question is not easily recognised as non fact. But you keep hoping to skate over these things even though you used it as ammo in a thread where you wrote many truly revolting things about women.

[Nick_A]

FDP wrote:

Hey Nick. If we are doing the selectivity thing. Why did you present the below obviously fake news story?

Nick_A wrote:
FDP wrote: Name a place in the USA that is under Sharia law.

http://nationalreport.net/city-michigan ... haria-law/


And why are you so desperate to avoid recognising that only a fool would fall for it?
All you managed was "it's not easy to tell truth from fact" which of course is only true when the thing in question is not easily recognised as non fact. But you keep hoping to skate over these things even though you used it as ammo in a thread where you wrote many truly revolting things about women.

I quoted that thread out of laziness. There is information all over the Net about the effect of Sharia in the world. That thread was on the top of google so I quoted it. Show me on the site where it doesn't assert that the article is true. Sharia hasn't gained sufficient political power yet but it easily may. Granted I should research any link but when a person is rushed, it is often not so easy. How much is false on Snopes for example. But the point is that it has nothing to do with blind denial Sharia is big in Michigan so if it hasn't acquired government power from Sharia supporters being voted in, it will probably happen soon. Majority rules and women will suffer.

[FlashDangerpants]

Sharia is big in Michigan so if it hasn't acquired government power from Sharia supporters being voted in, it will probably happen soon. Majority rules and women will suffer.

Perfect quote, thanks.

Every weird and stupid claim you make now is going to get pointed back to that.

I'm sure some smart person has already pointed out that Sharia is incompatible with US law and that above is impossible.

[Nick_A]

FDP wrot:

I'm sure some smart person has already pointed out that Sharia is incompatible with US law and that above is impossible.

Discuss this on the thread in question. This thread is about examples of the negativity of blind denial. However, remember that the Constitution is no longer relevant. America is now ruled by power, political corruption, and political correctness. If the Constitution were relevant, the laws against the invasion of America's southern border for example would be enforced. Those days are over. There is simply no reason to believe that if Sharia is wanted within a state within the United States there will be any opposition. Welcome to the real world.

[FlashDangerpants]

Top Quality Nick Shit (TQNS) is now a thing. Thanks for providing more. You're done by the way. Nobody was interested in your boring "blind denier" stuff, this conspiracy silliness is now what makes you so very Nick.

[Nick_A]

FDP, blind denial isn't a conspiracy; it is a human defense mechanism. In that way it is much like blind belief that makes one agenda driven. If you are smart you will realize its effect on you and try to free yourself from it rather than let it provide a sense of imaginary self importance which can only destroy your mind.

[FlashDangerpants]

You're a conspiracy nut who thinks Michigan will go Sharia. That's all anyone needs to know about you Nick. You are on the same level as Bob.

[Arising_uk]

... America is now ruled by power, political corruption, and political correctness. ...

It always has been, the only new thing here is PC.