Feminist Fantasy

[Dalek Prime]

The best feminist fantasy goes to Frederico Fellini, and his lovely film, City of Women.

[Nick_A]

Arising wrote:

But you only support it because it suits your current political and religious purposes, whereas you're quite happy that Christian women are getting this treatment with complete silence from you. That you also promote the idea that women actually like rape just about sums up you and your 'God'.

You are agenda driven. Anything beyond the ordinary must further your agenda of denial. I am not agenda driven and only seek to know the truth of the situation. An agenda driven person cannot understand a truth seeker. That is why you cannot understand me but rather can only refer to agendas. What furthers your agenda of denial is truth for you. Whatever interferes with it is false for you. So the abuse of women is supported by agenda driven people and women in particular who have political and social activism as their agenda. All must suffer for the agenda. The Great Beast smiles its approval

[Arising_uk]

You are agenda driven. Anything beyond the ordinary must further your agenda of denial. I am not agenda driven and only seek to know the truth of the situation. ...

lmfao! Stop reading Fux News then.

An agenda driven person cannot understand a truth seeker. That is why you cannot understand me but rather can only refer to agendas. ...

Of course I can understand you, like all your ilk you are a classic case of selective reading and confirmation bias.

What furthers your agenda of denial is truth for you. Whatever interferes with it is false for you. So the abuse of women is supported by agenda driven people and women in particular who have political and social activism as their agenda. All must suffer for the agenda. The Great Beast smiles its approval

For a truth-seeker you appear selective about which abuse of women you are willing to condemn, why is that?

[FlashDangerpants]

FDP, do you know how expensive it is to keep slaves now. Who can afford it? Obama's taxes prevent owning slaves. A man can hardly afford a wife and a mistress and you speak of owning slaves.

Your are being exceptionally flippant in reference to the KKK. Your failure to vociferously condemn them even though they are an active and murderous force within the USA means you are complicit in all they do.

I cannot believe that this is because you are irredeemably callous, therefore it must be something to do with a sexual fantasy you have about rape or domination.

[Nick_A]

Arising wrote:

For a truth-seeker you appear selective about which abuse of women you are willing to condemn, why is that?

In this case the intent of abuse of women cannot be denied. There is no attempt to hide it as in other cases. Then the question becomes why if the intent is so obvious don't more women's groups involved in political and social activism rise against the obvious when they preach equality. It is either due to fantasy and/or the desire for power through political and financial advantage. In other words these women seeking power or fantasy do not care about their fellow women as they profess to do. They only care about themselves and really do not care if a girl gets her head chopped off. If her death interferes with the feminist cause, it is justified on that basis.

Philosophy Now is pushing this article on Mary Daly and her feminist philosophy. It cannot be discussed since it would only lead to meaningless exchanges of opinions. However, in this case the issue is clear. Sharia's intentional abuse of women is admitted. There is no attempt to hide it. There is little resistance by women who profess to fight for women. The question remains: WHY

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Arising wrote:

For a truth-seeker you appear selective about which abuse of women you are willing to condemn, why is that?

In this case the intent of abuse of women cannot be denied. There is no attempt to hide it as in other cases. Then the question becomes why if the intent is so obvious don't more women's groups involved in political and social activism rise against the obvious when they preach equality. It is either due to fantasy and/or the desire for power through political and financial advantage. In other words these women seeking power or fantasy do not care about their fellow women as they profess to do. They only care about themselves and really do not care if a girl gets her head chopped off. If her death interferes with the feminist cause, it is justified on that basis.

Philosophy Now is pushing this article on Mary Daly and her feminist philosophy. It cannot be discussed since it would only lead to meaningless exchanges of opinions. However, in this case the issue is clear. Sharia's intentional abuse of women is admitted. There is no attempt to hide it. There is little resistance by women who profess to fight for women. The question remains: WHY

Your so-called 'feminists' are hardly the only ones with a political agenda a mile wide. Your own agenda is so transparent it's almost comical. The world is full of arseholes who pretend to care about people but are only interesting in pushing some agenda, be it brownie points for heaven or brownie points with some 'in' group, or money and/or power...
I can't believe how you ignore the murder of endangered animals by your hero Trump and his revolting family. You also fail to mention all the disgusting things that kristians do. African kristians are burning people alive. Kristian terrorist attacks in the US far outnumber muslim ones. That's not defending islam, only stating facts. Both religions are vile, and with a bit of luck (and an end to 'dumbing down) the world will be free of both in another few hundred years (whether or not humanity survives for that long).

Btw, I can't find anything on the internet about this:
Nick_A wrote,
''The fact that the United States has meddled in the affairs of Muslim countries justifies some Muslim father in America cutting his daughter's head off in support of Sharia law.''

[Arising_uk]

In this case the intent of abuse of women cannot be denied. There is no attempt to hide it as in other cases. Then the question becomes why if the intent is so obvious don't more women's groups involved in political and social activism rise against the obvious when they preach equality. ...

What are you talking about? Women's groups are involved in such cases all the time all over the world. You mean why aren't they banging on about it in America? Because Sharia Law is hardly a big problem over there, a much bigger problem is the increase in rapes, sexual assaults and domestic violence from the American male. All of which you ignore apparently.

It is either due to fantasy and/or the desire for power through political and financial advantage. In other words these women seeking power or fantasy do not care about their fellow women as they profess to do. They only care about themselves and really do not care if a girl gets her head chopped off. If her death interferes with the feminist cause, it is justified on that basis.

You don't really care, you're just doing this because it suits your current purpose.

Philosophy Now is pushing this article on Mary Daly and her feminist philosophy. It cannot be discussed since it would only lead to meaningless exchanges of opinions. However, in this case the issue is clear. Sharia's intentional abuse of women is admitted. There is no attempt to hide it. There is little resistance by women who profess to fight for women. The question remains: WHY

You mean why in America and the answer is that there are larger problems for women over there, namely professed Christian men.

Still, thanks for the heads-up, I see this Mary Daly recently died and it looks like PN has a piece in the articles section so I'll take a look.

[Hobbes' Choice]

The bottom line is that the abuse of women through Sharia law is no fun regardless of fantasies. Yet these utterly heartless people who post on this thread insist on making excuses for it.

The fact is the Western civilisation has oppressed and abused women for thousands of years.
The solution to this abuse was started about 100 years ago with the Women's movement in its carious forms, and WANKERS like Nick. A want that abuse to continue with his denigration of women as a whole.

He needs his botty spanked.

[Nick_A]

Notice how these posters refuse to answer the topic question. Their agendas prevent it. That is the frightening thing about agendas these posters further. Even the most vile forms of abuse are excused if they threaten their agenda. Sad, but it is the power of the agenda to create imaginary self importance that makes a person lose their normal feeling for compassion.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Notice how these posters refuse to answer the topic question. Their agendas prevent it. That is the frightening thing about agendas these posters further. Even the most vile forms of abuse are excused if they threaten their agenda. Sad, but it is the power of the agenda to create imaginary self importance that makes a person lose their normal feeling for compassion.

No, we can just see through YOUR sicko agenda. What you really wanted to talk about was 'rape fantasies'. What is it with kristians and their fucked-up sexuality?

[FlashDangerpants]

Notice how these posters refuse to answer the topic question. Their agendas prevent it.

We can all easily see you squirming to make an internet hoax suit your agenda.
You have no subtlety Nick.

You are also still a sick fucker for trying that rape trick.

[Arising_uk]

Notice how these posters refuse to answer the topic question. Their agendas prevent it. That is the frightening thing about agendas these posters further. Even the most vile forms of abuse are excused if they threaten their agenda. Sad, but it is the power of the agenda to create imaginary self importance that makes a person lose their normal feeling for compassion.

I've not excused anything nor do I condone such behavior. As such what I'm also not willing to do is join in with your political and religious hypocrisy.

[Hobbes' Choice]

Notice how these posters refuse to answer the topic question. Their agendas prevent it. That is the frightening thing about agendas these posters further. Even the most vile forms of abuse are excused if they threaten their agenda. Sad, but it is the power of the agenda to create imaginary self importance that makes a person lose their normal feeling for compassion.

1) There is no "topic question'. Your post was just more sick rant.
2) You're a misogynistic pr1ck.
3) You are completely incapable of answering any question.
4) You are in denial of the truth; in denial of yourself; in denial of the people of the Forum.

[Nick_A]

vee wrote

No, we can just see through YOUR sicko agenda. What you really wanted to talk about was 'rape fantasies'. What is it with kristians and their fucked-up sexuality?

If you want to start a thread on rape fantasies we can do that. But all you are doing here is demeaning real human suffering through silly accusations. You are the type of person who would see an older person with a cane wearing a Trump tee shirt and intentionally push him down while blaming it on kristians. Sick stuff.

[Nick_A]

Hobbes wrote:

There is no "topic question'. Your post was just more sick rant.

The OP asks: "why so many women look the other way on Muslim attempts to introduce Sharia law into America. Since it openly suppresses women." You ignore the question. My guess is that your misguided efforts to study critical thinking put you on the critical list for mental strain. You don't make sense and the sad part is that you think you do.