The PN game

[Philosophy Explorer]

Here's how it works. Somebody tries to post as much bs as the crowd can stand before flaming, banning, etc. occurs. The winner is the one who's most successful at this.

PhilX

[Hobbes' Choice]

Here's how it works. Somebody tries to post as much bs as the crowd can stand before flaming, banning, etc. occurs. The winner is the one who's most successful at this.

PhilX

No.
You win if you post something that is smart and worthwhile. Since you keep posting shit, you fail the game everytime.

[Philosophy Explorer]

Here's how it works. Somebody tries to post as much bs as the crowd can stand before flaming, banning, etc. occurs. The winner is the one who's most successful at this.

PhilX

No.
You win if you post something that is smart and worthwhile. Since you keep posting shit, you fail the game everytime.

Nobody wins. Because everybody's a winner. And that's because everybody thinks he or she posts something that is smart and worthwhile.

PhilX

[Dalek Prime]

I'll take door number 3, Monty.

[Philosophy Explorer]

Here's how it works. Somebody tries to post as much bs as the crowd can stand before flaming, banning, etc. occurs. The winner is the one who's most successful at this.

PhilX

No.
You win if you post something that is smart and worthwhile. Since you keep posting shit, you fail the game everytime.

BTW HR, has anyone ever called you a village idiot?

PhilX

[marjoram_blues]

Here's how it works. Somebody tries to post as much bs as the crowd can stand before flaming, banning, etc. occurs. The winner is the one who's most successful at this.

PhilX

It's not the only game in PN town. However, if you want to focus on the boring banning game, do you think there should be a limit to the period of play. And how many replays of the same game, by the same individual should be allowed?

[Philosophy Explorer]

Here's how it works. Somebody tries to post as much bs as the crowd can stand before flaming, banning, etc. occurs. The winner is the one who's most successful at this.

PhilX

It's not the only game in PN town. However, if you want to focus on the boring banning game, do you think there should be a limit to the period of play. And how many replays of the same game, by the same individual should be allowed?

It's interesting you brought up limits. Somebody did that in basketball a long time ago (with a clock buzzer) and the result was the game scores went up. The same may happen here if your proposal were adopted leading to more flaming, banning etc. Quite a game.

PhilX

[marjoram_blues]

PhilX
Crikey, perhaps we should have a tournament area, all roped off

[Philosophy Explorer]

PhilX
Crikey, perhaps we should have a tournament area, all roped off

How about a round Robin?

PhilX

[marjoram_blues]

PhilX
Crikey, perhaps we should have a tournament area, all roped off

How about a round Robin?

PhilX

Of beer, Batman?

[Philosophy Explorer]

PhilX
Crikey, perhaps we should have a tournament area, all roped off

How about a round Robin?

PhilX

Of beer, Batman?

OK Batgirl

PhilX

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Here's how it works. Somebody tries to post as much bs as the crowd can stand before flaming, banning, etc. occurs. The winner is the one who's most successful at this.

PhilX

No.
You win if you post something that is smart and worthwhile. Since you keep posting shit, you fail the game everytime.

Nobody wins. Because everybody's a winner. And that's because everybody thinks he or she posts something that is smart and worthwhile.

PhilX

Actually that's the most (only) intelligent thing I've seen you post.

[Philosophy Explorer]

Nobody wins. Because everybody's a winner. And that's because everybody thinks he or she posts something that is smart and worthwhile.

PhilX

Actually that's the most (only) intelligent thing I've seen you post.

You caught me on my bad day.

PhilX