The two dumbest groups of people in the world.
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: The two dumbest groups of people in the world.
I'm definitely dumb enough to keep feeding the troll.
Is there such a thing as a stroll, a spamming troll. As that'd be you bob.
-
bobevenson
- Posts: 7346
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: The two dumbest groups of people in the world.
You certainly do have a low word to smilie ratio, which is about all one needs to know about Kim (no relation to Novak except genitalia).Arising_uk wrote:I'm definitely dumb enough to keep feeding the troll.![]()
![]()
Is there such a thing as a stroll, a spamming troll. As that'd be you bob.
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: The two dumbest groups of people in the world.
It's coz I'm talking to a limited intellect bob.bobevenson wrote:You certainly do have a low word to smilie ratio, ...
-
bobevenson
- Posts: 7346
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: The two dumbest groups of people in the world.
Using just one smilie doubled your word-to-smilie ratio, but I'm still not impressed!Arising_uk wrote:It's coz I'm talking to a limited intellect bob.bobevenson wrote:You certainly do have a low word-to-smilie ratio, ...
Re: The two dumbest groups of people in the world.
You're typing too fast, Bob still doesn't get it.Arising_uk wrote:It's coz I'm talking to a limited intellect bob.bobevenson wrote:You certainly do have a low word to smilie ratio, ..
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: The two dumbest groups of people in the world.
bobevenson wrote:... but I'm still not impressed![/size][/b]
-
bobevenson
- Posts: 7346
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: The two dumbest groups of people in the world.
I was merely noting that you appear to be striving to improve your word-to-smilie ratio, but I'm not impressed since you are still far below average.Arising_uk wrote:bobevenson wrote:... but I'm still not impressed![/size][/b]You think that an accolade?!!
-
bobevenson
- Posts: 7346
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: The two dumbest groups of people in the world.
bobevenson wrote:I was merely noting that you appear to be striving to increase your word-to-smilie ratio, but I'm not impressed since you are still far below average.Arising_uk wrote:bobevenson wrote:... but I'm still not impressed![/size][/b]You think that an accolade?!!
Re: The two dumbest groups of people in the world.
What is so important about the smiley to word ratio, I think that Bob has nothing to say and is grasping at straws for a post.
-
bobevenson
- Posts: 7346
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: The two dumbest groups of people in the world.
People who use smilies at all are pathetically stupid. Those who use multiple smilies in lieu of words demonstrate a profound level of stupidity. Of course, a person like you who can't even remember it's the word-to-smilie ratio, not the smiley-to-word ratio, doesn't need smilies to demonstrate his profound stupidity.thedoc wrote:What is so important about the smiley to word ratio, I think that Bob has nothing to say and is grasping at straws for a post.
Last edited by bobevenson on Fri May 27, 2016 11:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: The two dumbest groups of people in the world.
That is just your opinion, and I don't place much, if any, value on your opinion.bobevenson wrote:people who use smilies at all are pathetically stupid. Those who use multiple smilies in lieu of words demonstrate a profound level of stupidity.thedoc wrote:What is so important about the smiley to word ratio, I think that Bob has nothing to say and is grasping at straws for a post.
FYI, you are not in possession of any facts that I credit you with.
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: The two dumbest groups of people in the world.
And what does that make those who think large and bold fonts add to import, it makes them loud-mouthed idiots.bobevenson wrote:People who use smilies at all are pathetically stupid. Those who use multiple smilies in lieu of words demonstrate a profound level of stupidity. Of course, a person like you who can't even remember it's the word-to-smilie ratio, not the smiley-to-word ratio, doesn't need smilies to demonstrate his profound stupidity.
Re: The two dumbest groups of people in the world.
I believe the correct term is "a loud mouth schnook".Arising_uk wrote:And what does that make those who think large and bold fonts add to import, it makes them loud-mouthed idiots.bobevenson wrote:People who use smilies at all are pathetically stupid. Those who use multiple smilies in lieu of words demonstrate a profound level of stupidity. Of course, a person like you who can't even remember it's the word-to-smilie ratio, not the smiley-to-word ratio, doesn't need smilies to demonstrate his profound stupidity.
-
bobevenson
- Posts: 7346
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: The two dumbest groups of people in the world.
Like I said, you don't need multiple smilies to demonstrate your profound stupidity, but they do add a proverbial exclamation point!thedoc wrote:I believe the correct term is "a loud mouth schnook".Arising_uk wrote:And what does that make those who think large and bold fonts add to import, it makes them loud-mouthed idiots.bobevenson wrote:People who use smilies at all are pathetically stupid. Those who use multiple smilies in lieu of words demonstrate a profound level of stupidity. Of course, a person like you who can't even remember it's the word-to-smilie ratio, not the smiley-to-word ratio, doesn't need smilies to demonstrate his profound stupidity.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
(is that enough smileys for Bob?)
Re: The two dumbest groups of people in the world.
And you have demonstrated that people who count smileys and use large bold type, are pathetically stupid and delusional.bobevenson wrote:People who use smilies at all are pathetically stupid. Those who use multiple smilies in lieu of words demonstrate a profound level of stupidity. Of course, a person like you who can't even remember it's the word-to-smilie ratio, not the smiley-to-word ratio, doesn't need smilies to demonstrate his profound stupidity.thedoc wrote:What is so important about the smiley to word ratio, I think that Bob has nothing to say and is grasping at straws for a post.