U.S. Government-sanctioned Slavery
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11762
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: U.S. Government-sanctioned Slavery
So I think I've satisfactorily answered your question, Bob. I assume we can end the thread now?
-
bobevenson
- Posts: 7346
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: U.S. Government-sanctioned Slavery
How about peacetime, just because you enlisted in the military, why shouldn't you be able to tell them to take this job and shove it like any civilian can? Isn't that non-dire slavery?Gary Childress wrote:Fair enough, Bob. In that case, I am against "slavery" under most all circumstances except the most dire.bobevenson wrote:Sorry, the subject of this thread is about U.S. government-sanctioned slavery of a military draft. If you don't care to comment, OK, but please stick to the subject.
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11762
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: U.S. Government-sanctioned Slavery
We don't draft people in peacetime, Bob.bobevenson wrote:How about peacetime, just because you enlisted in the military, why shouldn't you be able to tell them to take this job and shove it like any civilian can? Isn't that non-dire slavery?Gary Childress wrote:Fair enough, Bob. In that case, I am against "slavery" under most all circumstances except the most dire.bobevenson wrote:Sorry, the subject of this thread is about U.S. government-sanctioned slavery of a military draft. If you don't care to comment, OK, but please stick to the subject.
Are you suggesting that recruits in the military should be allowed to disobey the orders of their superiors? Wouldn't that tend to diminish the effectiveness of our military? And hence jeopardize the lives of the soldiers themselves?
-
Philosophy Explorer
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: U.S. Government-sanctioned Slavery
They do it different in the military. If you were to try it, you would go to prison or be shot by a firing squad.bobevenson wrote:How about peacetime, just because you enlisted in the military, why shouldn't you be able to tell them to take this job and shove it like any civilian can? Isn't that non-dire slavery?Gary Childress wrote:Fair enough, Bob. In that case, I am against "slavery" under most all circumstances except the most dire.bobevenson wrote:Sorry, the subject of this thread is about U.S. government-sanctioned slavery of a military draft. If you don't care to comment, OK, but please stick to the subject.
PhilX
-
bobevenson
- Posts: 7346
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: U.S. Government-sanctioned Slavery
You've just got a regular job in the army, but you don't like it. Why shouldn't you be able to just quit like any civilian? This is what slavery is all about whether you know it or not!Gary Childress wrote:Are you suggesting that recruits in the military should be allowed to disobey the orders of their superiors? Wouldn't that tend to diminish the effectiveness of our military? And hence jeopardize the lives of the soldiers themselves?
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11762
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: U.S. Government-sanctioned Slavery
Or they could be dishonorably discharged depending upon the circumstances.Philosophy Explorer wrote:They do it different in the military. If you were to try it, you would go to prison or be shot by a firing squad.bobevenson wrote:How about peacetime, just because you enlisted in the military, why shouldn't you be able to tell them to take this job and shove it like any civilian can? Isn't that non-dire slavery?Gary Childress wrote:Fair enough, Bob. In that case, I am against "slavery" under most all circumstances except the most dire.
PhilX
-
Philosophy Explorer
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: U.S. Government-sanctioned Slavery
BTW it's customary to give two weeks notice before leaving a job. And in Wisconsin, they do contracts over there (possibly other states) so you just can't quit.bobevenson wrote:You've just got a regular job in the army, but you don't like it. Why shouldn't you be able to just quit like any civilian? This is what slavery is all about whether you know it or not!Gary Childress wrote:Are you suggesting that recruits in the military should be allowed to disobey the orders of their superiors? Wouldn't that tend to diminish the effectiveness of our military? And hence jeopardize the lives of the soldiers themselves?
PhilX
Last edited by Philosophy Explorer on Sun May 15, 2016 12:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
bobevenson
- Posts: 7346
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: U.S. Government-sanctioned Slavery
Except for the military, you can quit any fucking job in America whenever you want without breaking the law!
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11762
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: U.S. Government-sanctioned Slavery
Let me rephrase my question, Bob. Wouldn't allowing recruits to disobey the orders of their superiors ultimately jeopardize the effectiveness of the military and therefore the lives of those in it who depend upon each other's cooperation? A simple "yes" or "no" answer will suffice for now.bobevenson wrote:You've just got a regular job in the army, but you don't like it. Why shouldn't you be able to just quit like any civilian?Gary Childress wrote:Are you suggesting that recruits in the military should be allowed to disobey the orders of their superiors? Wouldn't that tend to diminish the effectiveness of our military? And hence jeopardize the lives of the soldiers themselves?
No one forces anyone at gunpoint to sign up for the military in peacetime. Most young people know the terms of the contract. Under some circumstances they can be discharged for not cooperating, though it would be a "dishonorable" one. If they were allowed to quit or refuse direction at will we probably would either have an army full of fat, out of shape couch potatoes who wouldn't be ready for war when it came, or else no soldiers at all. The military is a very demanding life and those who choose that route often do it because they want to the honor to serve their country.
-
bobevenson
- Posts: 7346
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: U.S. Government-sanctioned Slavery
It's peacetime, and I'm a clerk-typist in the United States, so why shouldn't I be able to tell my boss to go fuck himself? I can except in the military. Please, don't bring that combat bullshit into play!
-
Philosophy Explorer
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: U.S. Government-sanctioned Slavery
bobevenson wrote:Except for the military, you can quit any fucking job in America whenever you want without breaking the law!
PHILXphilx wrote:WRONG,WRONG,WRONG. YOU SHOULD HAVE DONE YOUR RESEARCH BETTER.
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11762
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: U.S. Government-sanctioned Slavery
Isn't the potential of combat rather essential to the very raison d'être of the military? And wouldn't it reduce the readiness or effectiveness of the military if people could quit or refuse orders at will?bobevenson wrote:It's peacetime, and I'm a clerk-typist in the United States, so why shouldn't I be able to tell my boss to go fuck himself? I can except in the military. Please, don't bring that combat bullshit into play!
-
Philosophy Explorer
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: U.S. Government-sanctioned Slavery
Gary, you can never reason with a moron.Gary Childress wrote:Isn't the potential of combat rather essential to the very raison d'être of the military? And wouldn't it reduce the readiness or effectiveness of the military if people could quit or refuse orders at will?bobevenson wrote:It's peacetime, and I'm a clerk-typist in the United States, so why shouldn't I be able to tell my boss to go fuck himself? I can except in the military. Please, don't bring that combat bullshit into play!
PhilX
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11762
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: U.S. Government-sanctioned Slavery
"Moron" is a very pejorative term and I hesitate to apply it to others, even Bob. I think if Bob wishes to deal in overly simplified absolutes, then he just needs to think things through more or else acknowledge when others have valid points.Philosophy Explorer wrote:Gary, you can never reason with a moron.Gary Childress wrote:Isn't the potential of combat rather essential to the very raison d'être of the military? And wouldn't it reduce the readiness or effectiveness of the military if people could quit or refuse orders at will?bobevenson wrote:It's peacetime, and I'm a clerk-typist in the United States, so why shouldn't I be able to tell my boss to go fuck himself? I can except in the military. Please, don't bring that combat bullshit into play!
PhilX
-
Philosophy Explorer
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: U.S. Government-sanctioned Slavery
You're being too kind to him.Gary Childress wrote:"Moron" is a very pejorative term and I hesitate to apply it to others, even Bob. I think if Bob wishes to deal in overly simplified absolutes, then he just needs to think things through more or else acknowledge when others have valid points.
PhilX