Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Disable your ad blocker to continue using our website.
thedoc wrote:... Satyr was the same, but much too vulgar to be entertaining, he was mostly just annoying.
Hmm... I found the goaturder pretty entertaining and at least has read some philosophy, could address an issue from his point of view and say what you like he could write, whereas the loons just ignore the issue and go around and around in their madness.
thedoc wrote:... Satyr was the same, but much too vulgar to be entertaining, he was mostly just annoying.
Hmm... I found the goaturder pretty entertaining and at least has read some philosophy, could address an issue from his point of view and say what you like he could write, whereas the loons just ignore the issue and go around and around in their madness.
On one, now defunct, forum I was elevated to mod and then to admin before my account was deleted, but I would clean up Satyr's posts, and no-one ever complained.
bobevenson wrote:... as a divinely inspired utterance, ... [/size][/b]
About this,
bobevenson wrote:Theist, agnostic, atheist. As Bob the Baptist, I can tell you that the first and third are fools, and absolute fools at that.
bobevenson wrote:Anybody who isn't an agnostic is a fool.
So I can understand how an absolute fool can believe they are 'divinely' influenced but how does an agnostic do this? Presuming you're not an absolute fool that is.