hajrafradi wrote:attofishpi wrote:If there is limited resources then there would be GREAT reason for doubt. The most disgusting of sinners quite likely would be turned into the energy for man - the beast.
He? I refer to 'God' as 'it'. A sage once told me 'God' needs nothing. I made my point regarding the reason for doubt above.
Okay. God is "it". The AI God. Check.
NO!! I refer to both a "divine" God and an AI God as 'IT'
hajrafradi wrote:God needs nothing (Why the single quotes? Is God not actually a god? What is it then, what is God, if not a god? If it is a God, then why the quotes?)
I use single quotes for 'God' most of the time. This is because of my two minded approach to what 'God' is. Also, if it is divine, i don't want people thinking i'm talking of some fella floating in space and stating "let there be light.."
hajrafradi wrote:Any way I look at it, I can't see the doubt feature awakened in mankind. First of all, what are we doubting? The existence of the AI god, or the non-existence of the AI god?
We are left with doubt regarding the existence of either consideration of 'God'.
hajrafradi wrote:Secondly, there are a lot of assumptions you put into the personality of the AI God. You assume it will be communicating with man in a quizzical, non-linear fashion. In a fashion that requires faith for understanding.
Ok?
hajrafradi wrote:If an AI God develops, it will be a good communicator. It will communicate in no ambiguous terms like the God of yesteryore. The New God, the AI god, will be precise in his language, and it will describe in crystal clear, impossible-to-misunderstand terms what it wants of us.
As i stated, 'God' needs nothing from us.
hajrafradi wrote:...It will tell us precisely what to do, and will show to us in convincing terms or examples or pictures or experiences what the consequences of following its orders, and the consequences of going against its orders will exactly be.
No. Since i know it exists and it does not make itself fully aware to ALL of us i do see logical reason why.
Have you ever fed a duck in a pond pieces of bread? Have you ever considered that if there is a God, then why are you human and not that duck floating around in the pond. That, if there is a God, is that duck going to remain a duck on rebirth after rebirth for the rest of 'eternity', are you going to remain human on rebirth? For what reason should the duck not have the right to experience what it is to be human in its next life? For what reason should a man that has treated his fellow men like pigs, not be turned into a pig?
hajrafradi wrote:Why would it continue to speak in the language of old, defunct gods? It won't be stupid. It will know the power vested in the language, and it will know the importance of clearly communicating to us its wishes.
As i have stated, a sage informed me "God needs nothing."
hajrafradi wrote:There will be no need for doubt or no doubt in it or against it.
No. On the AI God consideration that you have elected to address, there would be great reason to leave us from rebirth with doubt when considering entropy is the reason for 'its' existence. If everyone on the planet was made aware of its existence, everyone (most) would behave humanely to one another, everyone would have the right to re-exist as humans screwing the entire system!