The Absolute Impossibility of Nothingness - ever

So what's really going on?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

User avatar
Dontaskme
Posts: 16929
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:07 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: The Absolute Impossibility of Nothingness - ever

Post by Dontaskme »

Dalek Prime wrote:"That which we know is alive is actually dead"? What crap. You're clearly alive to make stupid statements like this to other 'living' consciousnesses, Dontaskme.

Think...does a tree know it is alive?

Does a baby know it is alive?

Yes, aliveness is...knowledge tells us what aliveness is.

But my point is and I'm sure you will agree...no thing was ever born therefore there is no death for the unborn.

The only thing that is born is the mind, the mind say's yes I'm alive, but don't you see how absurd that is? the mind conjures up a separate I that is alive.

This I is a phantom, think ghost in the machine.

Another way of looking at this ....when the human being body dies...where has that person gone? if that person knew it was alive, then why can't it know it's died?

When the human body dies..the one animating that body vanishes, so who was the person that knows it was alive, and where has that person gone now it appears dead?

The truth is there is no such thing as life and death...except as concept/knowledge which is illusory.

The animating force is the one that is alive....this one is the same one in every one....the one driving your body engine is the same one driving my body engine, the body is just the vehicle for the one energy that is neither born or dead.

That's what's being discussed here...

You know the idea of birth and death via the knowledge you have of such, knowledge is illusory....without knowledge who is there to know such concepts as birth and death.

You know only from memory, the memory is the only place where the phantom spends it's allotted time, and it is from here that the continuity of life continues...the phantoms only way of continuing it's illusion is from retrieving dead memory and paying it forward into the present of the living moment of now...which is constantly being swallowed by the past by the forward flowing flux of life.....therefore life and death walk the razors edge simultaneously...being neither one nor the other....if you research this you will understand what I am saying...I know this sounds weird but it's because you have never been taught this by anyone in your life or at school....Lacewing understands it and so do millions of others.

Can the mind grasp this profound realisation...yes it can.

You have no idea who this you is that believes it is alive, you think the body dies but you have no way of knowing what death is.

It's all illusion.
Last edited by Dontaskme on Wed Mar 23, 2016 4:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Dalek Prime
Posts: 4922
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
Location: Living in a tree with Polly.

Re: The Absolute Impossibility of Nothingness - ever

Post by Dalek Prime »

Lacewing wrote:
Dalek Prime wrote: Drugs can help loosen patterns of thinking, that when one is then clear headed, one can start on a different path.
So, if one is not taking drugs, is one clear-headed? Have you seen some of the people in this forum? What determines clear-headed? What determines reality?

I do not insult the accomplishments of your journey in any way. I only ask, how do we ever know we've "reached" clear-headedness? Might there never be full/real clear-headedness as long as we're here? How do we know we're not wafting from one dream reality to another? Why would that be a bad thing? Why can't we just have fun with it?
And I'm not trying to insult your journey either, Lacewing, or anyone else's. Sure, we can have fun with the journey. There's no other point to it, save the enjoyment we may extract from it. But, if we are just wafting from one dream to the next, I would certainly hope that the next dream is less aggravating lol. Surely we can all dream a better dream than this?

Anyways, enjoy the experience.
User avatar
Dontaskme
Posts: 16929
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:07 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: The Absolute Impossibility of Nothingness - ever

Post by Dontaskme »

Lacewing wrote: So, why did "the one/ocean" start manufacturing such things? Was it to explore in all directions of infinite potential/possibility? Does it create a springboard effect to rebound off of... perhaps ever-increasing/expanding the potential/possibility?
I guess the mirror of consciousness is the springboard....reflecting itself everywhere...there is no image of me except the one consciousness creates as an image of consciousness....there is nothing outside of consciousness that is not the content of consciousness projected...we as consciousness cannot see ourself unless we look in our mirror and we see our reflected image staring back at us. We are the invisible manifest as every piece of dead matter.

We are weaving our own dream as unlimited eternal consciousness..

our consciousness (conscious)is experiencing itself as every brain (unconscious)...
User avatar
Lacewing
Posts: 6722
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:25 am

Re: The Absolute Impossibility of Nothingness - ever

Post by Lacewing »

Dalek Prime wrote:But, if we are just wafting from one dream to the next, I would certainly hope that the next dream is less aggravating lol. Surely we can all dream a better dream than this?
I wish that too, Dalek. I don't understand why I'm looping/swirling here... yet I also have the impression that it could all drastically change instantaneously if my way of viewing changes. I've had some extraordinary experiences of that... where much more was seen and "known"... and it felt totally natural. Since I don't think there's really anywhere to "go", I don't believe there are certain steps (or time) that I have to take. Rather (for me), it's about getting myself out of the way -- realizing what I think and do and fear, that obstructs my vibration from being more clearly attuned to more of what is.

I remember feeling so attuned and natural when I was a kid... but then the adults in my life (bless their fearful hearts) terrorized me into conformity, and I picked up a script. I've always tried to break the mold by improvising. It has been hard to "walk off the stage" when you've come to base your whole existence on it. But (from my perspective) it's just a part we're playing... and it does not threaten our existence. So I think this helped me move into the audience more than I used to... and I sit there eating popcorn and throwing it at the stage. Ultimately, I want to be able to walk out of the theater into the sunlight anytime I want. I'd like to make clear that I'm not sure ANY of these perspectives are good or bad -- rather, it might just be a matter of scope... and what any of us want our scope/experience to be. We can zero in on what we think the end-all answers must be... or we can be wide-open to the undiscovered potential in every moment.
User avatar
SpheresOfBalance
Posts: 5725
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:27 pm
Location: On a Star Dust Metamorphosis

Re: The Absolute Impossibility of Nothingness - ever

Post by SpheresOfBalance »

Arising_uk wrote:
SpheresOfBalance wrote:Not really, because we can only speak of our universe, whatever that might be. I won't commit to anything we cannot know at this time. For our universe, yeah, as long as you have always believed so, we have always tended to agree.
You are nearly incomprehensible in your speech. So do you agree or not that ''nothing' cannot exist
You are exceedingly repetitious, "nothing can never 'exist!'" NOTHING IS DEVOID OF EXISTENCE!!! GET IT??

in this or any universe because if it did exist it would not be nothing?
Exactly!! With 'nothing' there is no existence, Exactly! That you can't imagine it, is at issue here, nothing else. You also can neither imagine something from nothing nor infinite existence. Surely something always existing, is diametrically opposed to everything never existing. And something can't come from nothing. The entire issue is full of the brain hurting inability to comprehend. That you and all others exclude nothingness, is simply because you believe you exist. But existence is just as strange as non existence.

The latest in astrophysics has turned many into god fearing scientists. ...
Has it bollocks.
I've heard it from one of the leading Astrophysicists, not a bunch of wannabe philosophers here at the PNF. Sorry but I tend to believe those that would actually know about astrophysicists, namely astrophysicists.
Because they cannot face the something from nothing paradox, at least so said one of them on a documentary I saw a couple years ago.
He needs to do some Philosophy then as the question upon the scientists lips should be 'Why this something rather than another something?' and by-and-large that is what they ask and answer.
Yet you can't explain why there has to be anything in the first place. No one can! As it's well beyond our horizon. A bunch of dumb monkeys treating each other and their symbiotic biosphere, on which their life depends, as they do, in no way can understand such things. The human race is far to young to grasp the truth of such things. Theories are all we can muster.
No, you're an idiot to assume I've ever excluded myself. ...
Like I say, you are an idiot then.
No more so than you. So then what's the point, as they cancel one another out. It's just your means to 'believe' that you aren't one, (due to your fear), which in fact is false, if I am one. Your emotional self's means to fool yourself into 'believing' you are better than another. It's 'child's' play my friend, pure and simple. When you use such unnecessary redundant things as argument, it's your child speaking.
I have always spoke of humans! ...
This is your problem, as you think you speak for all.
No, I know, that on those aspects of which I speak, we are the same, all of humanity. That you make excuses, framing them otherwise, is your denial, for fears sake. Here's some lyrics from an Aussie band called "Unitopia." Obviously I'm not the only person admitting they know this, as evidenced by their lyrics. Maybe their method of saying it you'll appreciate more so than my venomous words. :

"...It's the way we live and die, in constant state of fear,
All we do is cover weakness, don't shed a single tear.
And every waking moment only serves to tell us why,
There's no second chances here..."
All many of us do, is still 'try and cover weakness,' at least I'm trying to grow beyond that. It would seem you're the queen of not. Keep in mind that I usually only respond in kind.

You and I are in fact humans!
What does that even mean!?
Are you actually capable of putting two thoughts together. Or is it just your ploy to purposely not do so?
It's common for idiots to not be capable of including themselves as flawed when noting human flaws. That's your problem not mine.
And yet I tend not to note flaws, that's your issue. I tend to question errors in logic and reasoning.
That you say this, your smoke screen of justification. By the way the title of that Aussie bands, (Unitopia's) song is "Justify." "All you do is cover weakness!" Denial!
You seem an elitist, ...
And you seem the usual Yank who has an inferiority issues with edumecashun.
Your child again, rearing it's immature head!
your bit "ones meaning is contained in the response 'you' provide," ...
I thank you for bringing this up yet again as it allows me to correct your misapprehension about how language works, so yes, if one uses language to communicate what one means then the response one gets is the meaning that was received, like it or not, if that response does not appear to be the one wanted from the words one use to express what one meant then one ought to pay close attention to them and if one wishes to still communicate that meaning then one should try some different words. Got it yet?
There you go again with your elitist ways. You are NOT 'the' measure of meaning, understanding or language! you are just like ALL the rest, my dear KIM. Namely, "a work in progress."
and that you could abuse Godfee, because of your credentials,
You know Godfree once thanked me for my honest and frank conversations with him don't you?
And so have I, which makes no necessary comment on your psyche, rather you giving your time.

I did not 'abuse' him, I questioned what he said philosophically and he asked my what gave me the right to say such things so I told him.
Not at all, you have changed things in your own mind so as to "cover weakness."
your sarcastic emoticons, your forever need to condescend others, all evidence that you believe you are superior, not a human. ...
When it comes to the subject of Philosophy I am superior to many and that is because I've bothered to read some and most upon interweeb philosophy forums quite apparently haven't.
You are not superior in any way my friend, simply a parrot! I have yet to hear anything 'original' from you that would speak of you alone, not those that you can quote.
You're just as fucked up as all the rest.
No, I'm more fucked-up than some and less so than others, no just about it, but this is just your issue as you wish others to be as fucked-up as you.
Not true at all, how the hell can anyone compare apples to oranges as if they are equal? To then say which is more important. You can't, each are just as important, theirs your just. I have continually been the anti falsehood voice here. And when I call attention to yours, you usually get pissed off and respond condescendingly.
But that I rub your face in it, you can't stand, the reason for all your nastiness. ...
You live a life of delusion if you think you bother me at all. Not least because I can just look at your posts and compare them with mine and there is no comparison to the tone you engender.
Only after you treat me with your condescending nature. Again I usually only treat in kind. The "degree" in which one is seemingly confrontational is of no consequence, as it has no necessary universal quantity.
Up to this point in your life, a stranger looks back at you in your mirror. ...
Don't know about you but when I look in a mirror I see myself.
No, rather the facade you portray. "All we do is cover weakness," for fear!
And I'm certain that you shall continue to be that ignorant, in denial!
Spoken like a true therapized.
Funny how you cling to those things that you believe you know, when you don't. I've never been in therapy, though I have picked the brains of psychologists, psychology courses at university, and psychology books. But then you shall characterize it however it serves your purpose, almost always condescendingly.
It's why you try and use education as a weapon, ...
I don't mention it at all unless asked.
Godfree did not ask. Yet you still don't understand my point on this matter. I'm saying that the way you "use" your education is to FIGHT! NOT teach! You use it as a weapon to defend your "self" more than you use it to enlighten others. There are those here that obviously use their education to help others, they tend to be somewhat selfless. Ginkgo comes to mind, as one of the greats! There are others whose dialog of relative degrees, displays nurturing of other psyches versus defense of their own psyche. 'Obviously' for you, largely education is a weapon.
why you pursued it in the first place, ...
I pursued it in the first place as I was an uneducated adult who was living in a time of recession and needed a bit of paper to get past the first round of employment vetting, that and that it was also the last time one could get an free education in this country. That I fell in love with the only subject that would take me was just a bonus. :lol:
Even that is combative, to get a job, to feed yourself, to stay alive, are you kidding me? You use it as a weapon! When the college counselors asked me what I wanted to major in I said, "Good question, I'm not sure." They then asked, "What career do you plan to pursue?" To which I replied, "I'm not attending college for the sake of making money, I'm here to learn of the world, to find the truth of things, (I had been thinking of philosophy though.)" So they said, "Then you should start with a degree in 'general studies' until you become more focused." I said, "that sounds great, sign me up." The only thing that matters to me is the truth of things, fuck everything else, I absolutely hate lies and liars. So I piss people off! Feelings aren't as important as the truth. And they usually take it personally. That's their problem, because the truth shall actually set them free, if they take it to heart.
why you tried to reprogram yourself with NLP, some serious denial. ...
Didn't try, just went and learnt how it works and how to apply it but the nice thing about NLP is you don't have to use it if you don't want. You should try it sometime as the partial therapy you've obviously received appears to have not worked at all but then you are probably a slight psychopath as they tend to never complete their therapy but clothe themselves in it, it's called denial.
I have your child, your 'slight psychopath' hanging. In truth your assessment of my psyche couldn't be less informed. It's ran by pure logic. The difference between me and others here is that they care more about friendship and getting along than the truth, I only care about truth, fuck peoples feelings! In that way I'm extremely honest. I can't be bought or sold because of my extreme allegiance to truth, fuck everything else, it doesn't matter. Only truth matters. So no NLP for me. My solution has been to understand the why of my psyche as well as everyone else's; the reasoning, I have in the past, am currently and will, employ to address human life's situations.
In your nightmares, you run from yourself! ...
I rarely have nightmares, sleep the sleep of the just me.
Seemingly missed my point.
It's probably why you were mugged! ;)
Given I was born and raised in one of the largest and oldest capitals in the world I think I've done pretty well on this account and the one time I didn't was because I was pissed and stoned and not paying the proper attention at two in the morning after a party in the equivalent of your Harlem. Luckily luck was upon my side that time.
My point was that I bet the way you carry yourself exudes arrogance, just asking to be humbled.
Dalek Prime
Posts: 4922
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
Location: Living in a tree with Polly.

Re: The Absolute Impossibility of Nothingness - ever

Post by Dalek Prime »

SOB, can we have a longer post next time, please?
User avatar
SpheresOfBalance
Posts: 5725
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:27 pm
Location: On a Star Dust Metamorphosis

Re: The Absolute Impossibility of Nothingness - ever

Post by SpheresOfBalance »

Greta wrote:
My bottom line is that it appears that what we perceive as "nothing" is not empty, just empty of whatever we can perceive.

Yes, infinity is as unimaginable as nothing, but the alternative to infinite reality seems impossible. A bounded universe? Bounded within what?

The mere existence of something renders the concept of nothingness relative. In truth, parts of reality are simply more densely packed than others - "something" is everywhere. The "thinned out" parts are what we call "nothing".
SpheresOfBalance wrote:I can see that your and my definitions of nothing are completely different. I mean, I understand your meaning. e.g., I can open my clenched fist, palm up, and say I have nothing in my hand. And while it's true that no one present can see anything, there are many things on/in/immediately above my hand. That is the common meaning of nothing. I mean no universe, no matter, no antimatter, no anything. I see that it's just as possible as something, i.e., our current universe, and all that it contains/is comprised of.
Why would you think nothing is just as possible as something? You have ready evidence for something but, by definition, not for actual nothingness.
Agreed, and so it would seem to be the more logical view. But what I'm reminded of is the causal question, "cause and effect." If life on planet earth is the effect of various elements being joined together, via electromagnetic energy, and the most common belief of the "origin" of the universe is a "big bang", it begs, "what banged," where did that come from, etc, etc, etc, etc, ad infinitum, such that it's unbelievable. Just a much, to my way of thinking, as the possibility of nothingness. So I include it. Lets face it, existence we are all friends of, because without it, we wouldn't be taking about it.


Perhaps there are voids where there is no matter or antimatter, but I doubt that would mean nothing at all is present. We are yet to find such a thing and no doubt there are exotic states of reality we don't understand yet. However, if there is absolute nothingness then that would be the universe by definition. In that case it would be universal nothingness, not that anyone would be around to care :)
Though it's equally as perplexing as existence ad infinitum, I include nothingness as it's opposite. So existence/anti existence. It's really that simple.

Still, since we only know "something", it requires a leap of faith to embrace the void.
Just as much faith as existence ad infinitum.

Apparently a number of people who undergo near death experiences report a visit to "the void", a place of nothingness where they can more clearly examine whatever it is about themselves that they think they are supposed to understand. Or something like that; I add this para for interest only.
No, it's cool, I could indeed be near death. ;)
User avatar
Lacewing
Posts: 6722
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:25 am

Re: The Absolute Impossibility of Nothingness - ever

Post by Lacewing »

Dontaskme wrote: ...there is nothing outside of consciousness that is not the content of consciousness projected...
:D I don't even know what to say -- this concept just made me smile.

I don't understand the statement below.
Dontaskme wrote:We are the invisible manifest as every piece of dead matter.
Are not death and life just part of the illusion?
Dontaskme wrote: We are weaving our own dream as unlimited eternal consciousness...
I need more purple for my weaving. :D
Dontaskme wrote:...our consciousness (conscious)is experiencing itself as every brain (unconscious)...
I realize that a lot of people may think all of this is pure babble... but I would ask them, how is it that they do not think that what they say is babble? I am very entertained that you, "Dontaskme", have arrived here to further describe such concepts. My communication skills only go so far on certain channels. I enjoy having more here to relate to.
Last edited by Lacewing on Wed Mar 23, 2016 6:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Dalek Prime
Posts: 4922
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
Location: Living in a tree with Polly.

Re: The Absolute Impossibility of Nothingness - ever

Post by Dalek Prime »

Lacewing wrote:
Dalek Prime wrote:But, if we are just wafting from one dream to the next, I would certainly hope that the next dream is less aggravating lol. Surely we can all dream a better dream than this?
I wish that too, Dalek. I don't understand why I'm looping/swirling here... yet I also have the impression that it could all drastically change instantaneously if my way of viewing changes. I've had some extraordinary experiences of that... where much more was seen and "known"... and it felt totally natural. Since I don't think there's really anywhere to "go", I don't believe there are certain steps (or time) that I have to take. Rather (for me), it's about getting myself out of the way -- realizing what I think and do and fear, that obstructs my vibration from being more clearly attuned to more of what is.

I remember feeling so attuned and natural when I was a kid... but then the adults in my life (bless their fearful hearts) terrorized me into conformity, and I picked up a script. I've always tried to break the mold by improvising. It has been hard to "walk off the stage" when you've come to base your whole existence on it. But (from my perspective) it's just a part we're playing... and it does not threaten our existence. So I think this helped me move into the audience more than I used to... and I sit there eating popcorn and throwing it at the stage. Ultimately, I want to be able to walk out of the theater into the sunlight anytime I want. I'd like to make clear that I'm not sure ANY of these perspectives are good or bad -- rather, it might just be a matter of scope... and what any of us want our scope/experience to be. We can zero in on what we think the end-all answers must be... or we can be wide-open to the undiscovered potential in every moment.
I hear you, Lacewing. Childhood is full of magic and possibilities. It's a shame we have to lose that wonderful feeling. Sad. Almost hearybreaking, really. But reality forces us to move on or wither. But never think I'm unsympathetic about another's dreams. That's exactly why I'm an antinatalist.
User avatar
SpheresOfBalance
Posts: 5725
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:27 pm
Location: On a Star Dust Metamorphosis

Re: The Absolute Impossibility of Nothingness - ever

Post by SpheresOfBalance »

Obvious Leo wrote:
Dontaskme wrote:So are we all in agreement that NOTHINGNESS has to be in order for SOMETHING to be ?
Count me out. To suggest that nothing exists is an inherently self-contradicting statement and one which any philosophy undergraduate should immediately recognise as such.
Demeaning tone of a parrot, thus immature and unknowing. That you've been bought and sold is of no necessary consequence to the truth of things.

'Nothing' is diametrically opposed to 'something.' Both human concepts/constructs have to 'exist' for either to 'exist.' I'm using 'exist' very loosely.

Dontaskme wrote: Arising_uk there is no such thing as a thing.


I agree with Arising. A "thing" is purely a phenomenological construct and is thus defined as an artefact of cognition. Therefore the notion of a "thing" has no ontological currency. Kant 101.
He's saying it 'exists' so as to speak of it, as if it's an it. It's not an it, rather it's the lack of any it's, existence, things, matter, antimatter, dark energy, dark matter, etc.. For any human concept to 'exist' it's counter must also 'exist.' as they both delineate one another. The lack of one defines the other, and vice versa.

I suggest you avoid using scientific terminology in your posts.
I suggest you avoid using condescending language and slander in your posts, as it makes you less credible, seemingly a child.
User avatar
SpheresOfBalance
Posts: 5725
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:27 pm
Location: On a Star Dust Metamorphosis

Re: The Absolute Impossibility of Nothingness - ever

Post by SpheresOfBalance »

Dalek Prime wrote:SOB, can we have a longer post next time, please?
Only if I'm answering one, equally as long, such that it's required!
Dalek Prime
Posts: 4922
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
Location: Living in a tree with Polly.

Re: The Absolute Impossibility of Nothingness - ever

Post by Dalek Prime »

SpheresOfBalance wrote:
Dalek Prime wrote:SOB, can we have a longer post next time, please?
Only if I'm answering one, equally as long, such that it's required!
Oh goody, there's still a chance then.
User avatar
SpheresOfBalance
Posts: 5725
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:27 pm
Location: On a Star Dust Metamorphosis

Re: The Absolute Impossibility of Nothingness - ever

Post by SpheresOfBalance »

Dalek Prime wrote:
SpheresOfBalance wrote:
Dalek Prime wrote:SOB, can we have a longer post next time, please?
Only if I'm answering one, equally as long, such that it's required!
Oh goody, there's still a chance then.
Just for you dalek, just for you!
User avatar
Greta
Posts: 4389
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2015 8:10 am

Re: The Absolute Impossibility of Nothingness - ever

Post by Greta »

Dalek Prime wrote:It's just that I don't think romantic notions of what we want things to be have any place in rational philosophy, and my view on that won't be altered.
There are two ideal scenarios at death that can be infected by wishful thinking:

One is the impossible-to-explain but highly positive afterlife hinted at by about 15% of near death occurrences. The other is your preference, hinted at by around 85% of near death occurrences (not really an experience) - to simply go into a deep sleep, end of story.

The beauty of the latter scenario is there are no consequences for our actions in life; the cause and effect that dogs us throughout life ceases at death. A non-existent slate is a clean slate. Each option looks preferable to reincarnation (although the first may include it) or the sadistic ideas in Iron Age myths.
User avatar
Greta
Posts: 4389
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2015 8:10 am

Re: The Absolute Impossibility of Nothingness - ever

Post by Greta »

My bottom line is that it appears that what we perceive as "nothing" is not empty, just empty of whatever we can perceive. Yes, infinity is as unimaginable as nothing, but the alternative to infinite reality seems impossible. A bounded universe? Bounded within what?

The mere existence of something renders the concept of nothingness relative. In truth, parts of reality are simply more densely packed than others - "something" is everywhere. The "thinned out" parts are what we call "nothing".
SpheresOfBalance wrote:I can see that your and my definitions of nothing are completely different. I mean, I understand your meaning. e.g., I can open my clenched fist, palm up, and say I have nothing in my hand. And while it's true that no one present can see anything, there are many things on/in/immediately above my hand. That is the common meaning of nothing. I mean no universe, no matter, no antimatter, no anything. I see that it's just as possible as something, i.e., our current universe, and all that it contains/is comprised of.
Greta wrote:Why would you think nothing is just as possible as something? You have ready evidence for something but, by definition, not for actual nothingness.
SpheresOfBalance wrote:Agreed, and so it would seem to be the more logical view. But what I'm reminded of is the causal question, "cause and effect." If life on planet earth is the effect of various elements being joined together, via electromagnetic energy, and the most common belief of the "origin" of the universe is a "big bang", it begs, "what banged," where did that come from, etc, etc, etc, etc, ad infinitum, such that it's unbelievable. Just a much, to my way of thinking, as the possibility of nothingness. So I include it. Lets face it, existence we are all friends of, because without it, we wouldn't be talking about it.

Yet every night we crave deep sleep. Also, meditation is considered preferable to waking states by some for the peacefulness it provides. So are we so down on nothingness?

The problem I have with nothingness is wasted information at death - so much of what we are and have learned. Is it really lost, or is it changed? Ancient life gave rise to today's forms. We will give rise to tomorrow's. What's the difference. It seems to me that the character of each entity is gradually distilled into the essence of a larger system. So, whatever makes up you and me and the rest of humanity is being distilled and concentrated rather than lost. Eventually humanity's bodies of knowledge will far greater but will only be accessed by many fewer than seven billion minds. However, all of that information is still there and potentially retrievable, which is why some posit that we could be part of a holographic recreation by hyper advanced beings (which is theoretically possible but obviously far fetched).

I can see your theoretical point that everything having its opposite, so something's opposite would be nothing. However, the universe, while unbounded, is does have limitations. There are numerous possibilities that are impossible (or have probabilities in the quintillions) in the reality we live in. It then stands to reason that nothingness is not to opposite to the "something" in which we live. Rather, the opposite is as far from absolute nothingness as our reality is from manifesting "everything all of the time". In other words, while being a very long way from absolute nothingness, the opposite to something to our perspective would seem so close to nothing as to make the difference moot.

In short, everything manifesting at once all the time is the logical opposite to absolute nothingness.
Post Reply