No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

bobevenson · Post by **bobevenson** » Mon Dec 28, 2015 6:43 pm

uwot wrote:
bobevenson wrote:...under the AEP, the government does not own, operate support or promote anything.
Reverend Bob, I was so hoping you'd be new type of divinely inspired prophet; one that speaks clearly and consistently. Oh well. So how should I interpret the above?

You remind me of John on the isle Patmos, who wrote the book of Revelation in the year 96AD. I'm sure all his friends and associates said, "What the fuck are you talking about."

Arising_uk · Post by **Arising_uk** » Mon Dec 28, 2015 7:49 pm

You think he had friends.

bobevenson · Post by **bobevenson** » Mon Dec 28, 2015 8:20 pm

Arising_uk wrote: You think he had friends.

Maybe not, but anybody reading his manuscript would have asked, "What the fuck are you talking about?"

Arising_uk · Post by **Arising_uk** » Tue Dec 29, 2015 2:54 am

Funnily enough I doubt this as at the time there would have been many such nutjobs making apocalyptical pronouncements and the metaphorical language they used would probably have been fairly common currency.

Hobbes' Choice · Post by **Hobbes' Choice** » Tue Dec 29, 2015 7:23 pm

http://usuncut.com/world/here-are-9-rea ... -the-dust/

bobevenson · Post by **bobevenson** » Tue Dec 29, 2015 11:29 pm

Hobbes' Choice wrote:http://usuncut.com/world/here-are-9-rea ... -the-dust/

Who the fuck are you, Philosophy Explorer in disguise? I don't read fucking links. If you got something to say, say it!

Philosophy Explorer · Tue Dec 29, 2015 11:34 pm

bobevenson wrote:
Hobbes' Choice wrote:http://usuncut.com/world/here-are-9-rea ... -the-dust/
Who the fuck are you, Philosophy Explorer in disguise? I don't read fucking links. If you got something to say, say it!

PhilX

Hobbes' Choice · Post by **Hobbes' Choice** » Wed Dec 30, 2015 12:27 am

Philosophy Explorer wrote:
bobevenson wrote:
Hobbes' Choice wrote:http://usuncut.com/world/here-are-9-rea ... -the-dust/
Who the fuck are you, Philosophy Explorer in disguise? I don't read fucking links. If you got something to say, say it!

PhilX

uwot · Post by **uwot** » Wed Dec 30, 2015 8:56 am

bobevenson wrote:You remind me of John on the isle Patmos, who wrote the book of Revelation in the year 96AD. I'm sure all his friends and associates said, "What the fuck are you talking about."

But Reverend Bob, you're the prophet. It's true that sometimes people don't know what the fuck I am talking about; as a rule I will try and clarify, but some people are just beyond hope, don't you find? Anyway, people are still wondering what the fuck the author of Revelation was talking about, even who he was. So what's your take Reverend Bob? Are you a futurist, a historicist, an idealist or something else?

bobevenson · Post by **bobevenson** » Wed Dec 30, 2015 3:49 pm

uwot wrote:
bobevenson wrote:You remind me of John on the isle Patmos, who wrote the book of Revelation in the year 96AD. I'm sure all his friends and associates said, "What the fuck are you talking about."
But Reverend Bob, you're the prophet. It's true that sometimes people don't know what the fuck I am talking about; as a rule I will try and clarify, but some people are just beyond hope, don't you find? Anyway, people are still wondering what the fuck the author of Revelation was talking about, even who he was. So what's your take Reverend Bob? Are you a futurist, a historicist, an idealist or something else?

No, my friend, although I'm a prophet, so was John on the isle of Patmos, and "The Ouzo Prophecy" provides clarification of the book of Revelation. Both are divinely inspired utterances dealing with the past, present and future.

uwot · Post by **uwot** » Wed Dec 30, 2015 3:55 pm

I don't doubt it Reverend Bob. Exciting news! I've just discovered that my street has 7 hills (well, speed bumps), so has Cincinnati! Should I take it as a sign?

Philosophy Explorer · Post by **Philosophy Explorer** » Wed Dec 30, 2015 4:04 pm

uwot wrote:I don't doubt it Reverend Bob. Exciting news! I've just discovered that my street has 7 hills (well, speed bumps), so has Cincinnati! Should I take it as a sign?

Only if a phrenologist says so.

PhilX

bobevenson · Post by **bobevenson** » Wed Dec 30, 2015 4:13 pm

uwot wrote:I don't doubt it Reverend Bob. Exciting news! I've just discovered that my street has 7 hills (well, speed bumps), so has Cincinnati! Should I take it as a sign?

No, I'm afraid the only divinely inspired connection to the seven hills of ancient Rome, referred to as Babylon the queen in the book of Revelation, is Cincinnati, also referred to as the Queen City, and I was able to discover the first appearance of this nickname in 20 minutes, something the rest of the world couldn't discover in 170 years, in a description that could have been taken directly out of the book of Revelation.

uwot · Post by **uwot** » Wed Dec 30, 2015 4:17 pm

Aw well. What was Babylon referred to by John. My guess is Eastbourne.

bobevenson · Post by **bobevenson** » Wed Dec 30, 2015 4:29 pm

uwot wrote:Aw well. What was Babylon referred to by John. My guess is Eastbourne.

I'm sorry, at this point you seem to be talking total nonsense.

Philosophy Now Forum

No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP