Blasphemy: to injure via words
-
marjoram_blues
- Posts: 1629
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 12:50 pm
Re: Blasphemy: to injure via words
It's beginning to look like you lot are ganging up on JS. There will be talk of ignorant tribes...
Not fair. Not funny.
Not fair. Not funny.
- attofishpi
- Posts: 13319
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
- Location: Orion Spur
- Contact:
Re: Blasphemy: to injure via words
Oh well, and it came to pass that there was not much credence in a sage that was jaded.
-
marjoram_blues
- Posts: 1629
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 12:50 pm
Re: Blasphemy: to injure via words
Whatever. Leave her alone.attofishpi wrote:Oh well, and it came to pass that there was not much credence in a sage that was jaded.
- attofishpi
- Posts: 13319
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
- Location: Orion Spur
- Contact:
Re: Blasphemy: to injure via words
I can't. Woof!marjoram_blues wrote:Whatever. Leave her alone.attofishpi wrote:Oh well, and it came to pass that there was not much credence in a sage that was jaded.
-
marjoram_blues
- Posts: 1629
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 12:50 pm
Re: Blasphemy: to injure via words
Can't or won't? What's with the silly 'Woof!' ?attofishpi wrote:I can't. Woof!marjoram_blues wrote:Whatever. Leave her alone.attofishpi wrote:Oh well, and it came to pass that there was not much credence in a sage that was jaded.
- attofishpi
- Posts: 13319
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
- Location: Orion Spur
- Contact:
Re: Blasphemy: to injure via words
Oh no. I was hoping i wouldn't have to spell it out. Check out my avatar and she's a ***** on heat.marjoram_blues wrote:Can't or won't? What's with the silly 'Woof!' ?
..ah the relief, i didn't spell it out.
-
marjoram_blues
- Posts: 1629
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 12:50 pm
Re: Blasphemy: to injure via words
That's disgustingattofishpi wrote:Oh no. I was hoping i wouldn't have to spell it out. Check out my avatar and she's a ***** on heat.marjoram_blues wrote:Can't or won't? What's with the silly 'Woof!' ?
..ah the relief, i didn't spell it out.
- attofishpi
- Posts: 13319
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
- Location: Orion Spur
- Contact:
Re: Blasphemy: to injure via words
Really? You should have seen what i just ate.marjoram_blues wrote:That's disgustingattofishpi wrote:Oh no. I was hoping i wouldn't have to spell it out. Check out my avatar and she's a ***** on heat.marjoram_blues wrote:Can't or won't? What's with the silly 'Woof!' ?
..ah the relief, i didn't spell it out.
-
Jaded Sage
- Posts: 1100
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2015 2:00 pm
Re: Blasphemy: to injure via words
Yeah, I'm focusing on the.. ..I guess it's the etymological meaning. Blasphemy would be teaching someone that something which is important is actually unimportant and teaching someone that something which is unimportant is actually important.Obvious Leo wrote:I'm afraid I'm no closer to understanding the nature of the question you seek to explore. You seem to be using a non-standard definition of the word blasphemy so perhaps an example of a blasphemous statement might serve to illustrate your point.
Can I also throw in this semi-joke? That last line about good and bad knives... the virtue of a knife is sharpness! lol
-
Obvious Leo
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Wed May 13, 2015 1:05 am
- Location: Australia
Re: Blasphemy: to injure via words
Important to whom?Jaded Sage wrote: Blasphemy would be teaching someone that something which is important is actually unimportant and teaching someone that something which is unimportant is actually important.
-
Jaded Sage
- Posts: 1100
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2015 2:00 pm
Re: Blasphemy: to injure via words
The same person who declared sharp knives to cut better than dull knives.