alpha wrote:no offense, but this is a very ignorant statement;
first of all, not every adult has the option/ability to end his/her life. a quadriplegic for instance, can't even take a dump (intentionally) on his/her own, let alone do everything necessary to end their life. ...
Arising_uk wrote:Why do you assume the quadriplegic wishes to end their life?
lol. i'm not saying all quadriplegics wish to end their lives, that would clearly be false. i'm saying that some do wish it, but can't accomplish it.
alpha wrote:i can provide many more examples and scenarios, but it's not necessary. ...
Arising_uk wrote:But they'll all be exceptional ones whereas you wish to apply your thoughts to all and most of them can choose to end their lives if they truly wish it.
i think there's been a misunderstanding; i'm only talking about the ones who don't wanna be here. those who do, are more than welcome to stay till the cows come home.
alpha wrote:secondly, there is such a thing as the 'self preservation' instinct. bypassing it isn't easy, and staying "alive" because of it, doesn't mean/suggest that the person prefers staying around.
Arising_uk wrote:Why do you think this 'set-preservation' instinct works? Because it's instinctual that existing is better than not.
yes, "instinctually" existing is better, but not (necessarily) logically better.
alpha wrote:thirdly, why create a mess, then expect the mess to clean itself up (if it's unhappy about it)?
Arising_uk wrote:What do you mean by 'why' here? You think something is actually responsible? Other than ones parents of course.
without getting too philosophical, i think god is responsible, first and foremost, other than that, parents, grandparents, all the way up the ancestral chain.