Arising_uk wrote:There are various forms of determinism so what is this 'true' choice you think doesn't exist?
In your determinism what happens when you have equally weighted options?
from what i know, they generally divide determinism into two categories: hard/strict determinism, and soft determinism a.k.a compatibilism. in reality they're both the same in denying
any true freewill. the only doctrine that claims true freewill is libertarianism, which has yet to provide any evidence that even suggests anything other than determinism or indeterminism is possible. (i believe indeterminism is also impossible, but even its hypothetical possibility doesn't help proponents of genuine freewill).
btw, there is no such thing as "equally weighted options". even unequally weighted "options" are not real options, they just appear to be options.
alpha wrote:please stop peddling personal opinions or anecdotal evidence. if you have any logical, or conclusive scientific evidence, please present it, otherwise, don't.
Arising_uk wrote:The logic is clear but you ignore it, non-existents cannot be in any form of relation how are you doing this?
what clear logic? that a nonexistent can't have an opinion? it doesn't need to; just like it doesn't need anything else.
Arising_uk wrote:The questions you raise are existential ones and I'd be impressed if their is any 'scientific' evidence concerning this subject? The thing about anecdotal evidence in this subject is that it is the evidence that we all have to refer to, i.e. existing.
anecdotal evidence hasn't much value for anyone other than the experiencer himself. i can assure you that my anecdotal evidence (as well as many others) is much different than yours (and those similar to yours). if there isn't any scientific evidence, what about logical?
Arising_uk wrote:You've not answered my questions, which goals have you got that you have not chosen? What are these higher goals that you have?
what my exact goals are, is irrelevant (let's say having total control of my traits and my environment). the point is, i was created without my consent, with characteristics that i'm unhappy with, in a world with which i'm unimpressed, if i was the only one, i'd just get over it, walk it off, or something, but i'm not alone.