Winning your arguments

For all things philosophical.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
Philosophy Explorer
Posts: 5621
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am

Winning your arguments

Post by Philosophy Explorer »

I can tell you that name calling and ad homs aren't the way:

http://lifehacker.com/the-definitive-gu ... 1693076653

PhilX
User avatar
MagsJ
Posts: 446
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2013 6:23 pm
Location: Suryaloka / LDN Town

Re: Winning your arguments

Post by MagsJ »

Saying you've won a debate isn't the way to win it either, but some think by merely saying so it makes it true.

I think ad Homs and such make for a bad-faith debate, and weakens that persons argument.
surreptitious57
Posts: 4257
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 6:09 am

Re: Winning your arguments

Post by surreptitious57 »

Philosophy Explorer wrote:
I can tell you that name calling and ad homs are not the way
Remember this the next time you call Hex a retard or a moron
Philosophy Explorer
Posts: 5621
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am

Re: Winning your arguments

Post by Philosophy Explorer »

surreptitious57 wrote:
Philosophy Explorer wrote:
I can tell you that name calling and ad homs are not the way
Remember this the next time you call Hex a retard or a moron
He's a lost cause. I'm just repaying him.

PhilX
Risto
Posts: 75
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2015 6:59 am

Re: Winning your arguments

Post by Risto »

I wanted to say that why try to win at all, but luckily the article concluded with this point:

"You may not change the other person’s mind, but there are other ways to win. If you change what winning means to you, the possibilities are endless. Winning can be resolving the conflict peacefully, getting them to admit they’re wrong about one thing and not the whole topic, or intentionally giving in because you care about them."

You can also argue to learn something new as well as practice critical thinking/arguing.
Post Reply