I can tell you that name calling and ad homs aren't the way:
http://lifehacker.com/the-definitive-gu ... 1693076653
PhilX
Winning your arguments
Re: Winning your arguments
Saying you've won a debate isn't the way to win it either, but some think by merely saying so it makes it true.
I think ad Homs and such make for a bad-faith debate, and weakens that persons argument.
I think ad Homs and such make for a bad-faith debate, and weakens that persons argument.
-
surreptitious57
- Posts: 4257
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 6:09 am
Re: Winning your arguments
Remember this the next time you call Hex a retard or a moronPhilosophy Explorer wrote:
I can tell you that name calling and ad homs are not the way
-
Philosophy Explorer
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: Winning your arguments
He's a lost cause. I'm just repaying him.surreptitious57 wrote:Remember this the next time you call Hex a retard or a moronPhilosophy Explorer wrote:
I can tell you that name calling and ad homs are not the way
PhilX
Re: Winning your arguments
I wanted to say that why try to win at all, but luckily the article concluded with this point:
"You may not change the other person’s mind, but there are other ways to win. If you change what winning means to you, the possibilities are endless. Winning can be resolving the conflict peacefully, getting them to admit they’re wrong about one thing and not the whole topic, or intentionally giving in because you care about them."
You can also argue to learn something new as well as practice critical thinking/arguing.
"You may not change the other person’s mind, but there are other ways to win. If you change what winning means to you, the possibilities are endless. Winning can be resolving the conflict peacefully, getting them to admit they’re wrong about one thing and not the whole topic, or intentionally giving in because you care about them."
You can also argue to learn something new as well as practice critical thinking/arguing.