Who should be denied choice?

How should society be organised, if at all?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Dalek Prime
Posts: 4922
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
Location: Living in a tree with Polly.

Re: Who should be denied choice?

Post by Dalek Prime »

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:
Dalek Prime wrote: Fuck you Bob. Octomom gets nine votes, the fat ignorant slob? People get extra votes because they consume more resources after fucking their filthy asses off? Up yours.
You would be 'fat' too if you had 8 children. She's not even fat.
Way to defend trash, veg.
User avatar
vegetariantaxidermy
Posts: 13975
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
Location: Narniabiznus

Re: Who should be denied choice?

Post by vegetariantaxidermy »

Dalek Prime wrote:
vegetariantaxidermy wrote:
Dalek Prime wrote: Fuck you Bob. Octomom gets nine votes, the fat ignorant slob? People get extra votes because they consume more resources after fucking their filthy asses off? Up yours.
You would be 'fat' too if you had 8 children. She's not even fat.
Way to defend trash, veg.
So by saying she's not fat, which happens to be true, is 'defending trash'? Someone is either fat or they are not.
Dalek Prime
Posts: 4922
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
Location: Living in a tree with Polly.

Re: Who should be denied choice?

Post by Dalek Prime »

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:So by saying she's not fat, which happens to be true, is 'defending trash'? Someone is either fat or they are not.
Whoopee shit. So she doesn't have an ounce on her. She's still trash.
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Who should be denied choice?

Post by bobevenson »

Dalek Prime wrote:Octomom gets nine votes...
She gets one vote and her children get one vote. You are one cut above illiterate.
Dalek Prime
Posts: 4922
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
Location: Living in a tree with Polly.

Re: Who should be denied choice?

Post by Dalek Prime »

bobevenson wrote:
Dalek Prime wrote:Octomom gets nine votes...
She gets one vote and her children get one vote. You are one cut above illiterate.
And do they vote with crayons, fucknut? No, she votes nine times, doofus.
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Who should be denied choice?

Post by bobevenson »

Dalek Prime wrote:
bobevenson wrote:
Dalek Prime wrote:Octomom gets nine votes...
She gets one vote and her children get one vote. You are one cut above illiterate.
And do they vote with crayons, fucknut? No, she votes nine times, doofus.
God, you are dumber than stupid, she votes as a surrogate for her children in their best interests. What's your fucking problem anyway, are you just plain ignorant or just playing ignorant?
Dalek Prime
Posts: 4922
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
Location: Living in a tree with Polly.

Re: Who should be denied choice?

Post by Dalek Prime »

Adult's get a vote. One vote. Children aka political retards, get none. Their interests are served by the parents ie. the family unit.
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Who should be denied choice?

Post by bobevenson »

Dalek Prime wrote:Adult's get a vote. One vote. Children aka political retards, get none. Their interests are served by the parents ie. the family unit.
Children come under governmental law, and therefore have the right to participate in democratic elections, either directly or through a surrogate committed to their best interests.
Dalek Prime
Posts: 4922
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
Location: Living in a tree with Polly.

Re: Who should be denied choice?

Post by Dalek Prime »

bobevenson wrote:
Dalek Prime wrote:Adult's get a vote. One vote. Children aka political retards, get none. Their interests are served by the parents ie. the family unit.
Children come under governmental law, and therefore have the right to participate in democratic elections, either directly or through a surrogate committed to their best interests.
Just stop. :roll:
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Who should be denied choice?

Post by bobevenson »

Dalek Prime wrote:
bobevenson wrote:
Dalek Prime wrote:Adult's get a vote. One vote. Children aka political retards, get none. Their interests are served by the parents ie. the family unit.
Children come under governmental law, and therefore have the right to participate in democratic elections, either directly or through a surrogate committed to their best interests.
Just stop. :roll:
Just get off this stupid thread you created, go to The Lounge, and start another stupid thread you can discuss with Philosophy Explorer, an idiot you can relate to.
Dalek Prime
Posts: 4922
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
Location: Living in a tree with Polly.

Re: Who should be denied choice?

Post by Dalek Prime »

bobevenson wrote: Just get off this stupid thread you created, go to The Lounge, and start another stupid thread you can discuss with Philosophy Explorer, an idiot you can relate to.
I didn't create this thread. You really can't get anything right, can you Bob?
User avatar
Lacewing
Posts: 6722
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:25 am

Re: Who should be denied choice?

Post by Lacewing »

bobevenson wrote:
Children come under governmental law, and therefore have the right to participate in democratic elections, either directly or through a surrogate committed to their best interests.
I don't know what world you're talking about, Bob. Sounds like fantasy la-la-land. Voting is the LAST THING children give a crap about! They would just like to have enough food and shelter and to be protected FROM all the psychotic and predatory adults they're surrounded by. Voting does very little to ensure any of that. It seems ridiculous to focus on the voting rights of a fetus... by empowering the adults who are producing them to have even MORE SAY when so many babies are being born to very stupid and destructive people who don't know any better.

Why do you focus on the most bizarre things that really don't seem to resolve anything?
Philosophy Explorer
Posts: 5621
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am

Re: Who should be denied choice?

Post by Philosophy Explorer »

bobevenson wrote:Just get off this stupid thread you created, go to The Lounge, and start another stupid thread you can discuss with Philosophy Explorer, an idiot you can relate to.
Boob, stop looking at that mirror (btw, it was me who created this thread stupid).

PhilX
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Who should be denied choice?

Post by bobevenson »

Dalek Prime wrote:
bobevenson wrote: Just get off this stupid thread you created, go to The Lounge, and start another stupid thread you can discuss with Philosophy Explorer, an idiot you can relate to.
I didn't create this thread. You really can't get anything right, can you Bob?
I'm sorry, I guess I got you confused with Philosophy Explorer, you're so much alike.
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Who should be denied choice?

Post by bobevenson »

Lacewing wrote:
bobevenson wrote:
Children come under governmental law, and therefore have the right to participate in democratic elections, either directly or through a surrogate committed to their best interests.
I don't know what world you're talking about, Bob. Sounds like fantasy la-la-land. Voting is the LAST THING children give a crap about! They would just like to have enough food and shelter and to be protected FROM all the psychotic and predatory adults they're surrounded by. Voting does very little to ensure any of that. It seems ridiculous to focus on the voting rights of a fetus... by empowering the adults who are producing them to have even MORE SAY when so many babies are being born to very stupid and destructive people who don't know any better. Why do you focus on the most bizarre things that really don't seem to resolve anything?
My focus resolves everything. Why do you want to take the vote away from children whose lives are largely controlled by government laws and officials instead of their parents?
Post Reply