As the AEP says, one person, one vote. If you've got a fucking problem with that, too fucking bad. If there's a problem deciding who will represent the children, the legal system can make that decision. Jesus Christ, can't you see the big picture rather than bring up every stupid piddly point you're so famous for?Lacewing wrote:Are you assuming that the mother and father stay married and/or agree on everything? What planet is that? What if the mother and father belong to differing parties -- then who decides which way the triplet babies vote? What if the babies would prefer to exercise their right NOT to vote... and then they grow up being pissed off that they were used as a pawn by their deluded parent for political purposes that the baby would have opposed? Would orphanages get to vote for all the orphans in their care?bobevenson wrote:Of course triplets would each have a vote, and it would be cast by one of their parents. As they are growing up, the parents would remain their surrogate until the parents decide they can vote on their own. This is how things would be properly handled under the AEP.
Who should be denied choice?
-
bobevenson
- Posts: 7346
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: Who should be denied choice?
-
Philosophy Explorer
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: Who should be denied choice?
The legal system is overburdened as it is with nonsense cases.bobevenson wrote:As the AEP says, one person, one vote. If you've got a fucking problem with that, too fucking bad. If there's a problem deciding who will represent the children, the legal system can make that decision. Jesus Christ, can't you see the big picture rather than bring up every stupid piddly point you're so famous for?Lacewing wrote:Are you assuming that the mother and father stay married and/or agree on everything? What planet is that? What if the mother and father belong to differing parties -- then who decides which way the triplet babies vote? What if the babies would prefer to exercise their right NOT to vote... and then they grow up being pissed off that they were used as a pawn by their deluded parent for political purposes that the baby would have opposed? Would orphanages get to vote for all the orphans in their care?bobevenson wrote:Of course triplets would each have a vote, and it would be cast by one of their parents. As they are growing up, the parents would remain their surrogate until the parents decide they can vote on their own. This is how things would be properly handled under the AEP.
PhilX
-
bobevenson
- Posts: 7346
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: Who should be denied choice?
What's wrong with vote buying, you fucking Communist.Philosophy Explorer wrote:Sounds like vote buying.
Re: Who should be denied choice?
Okay, so the legal system can take on the task of handling all voting disputes in families, and if children don't like the way their parents are voting for them, they can run away from home. This just keeps getting better and better in Bizarro Bob's Mad Mad World of Complete Chaos and Nonsense.
-
Philosophy Explorer
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: Who should be denied choice?
Look Boob, you're the one proposing communism with your BS proxy system.bobevenson wrote:What's wrong with vote buying, you fucking Communist.Philosophy Explorer wrote:Sounds like vote buying.
That reminds me. When did your parents allow you to vote?
PhilX
-
bobevenson
- Posts: 7346
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: Who should be denied choice?
Quit talking nonsense, idiot. Go back to The Lounge where you belong!
-
Dalek Prime
- Posts: 4922
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
- Location: Living in a tree with Polly.
Re: Who should be denied choice?
Fuck you Bob. Octomom gets nine votes, the fat ignorant slob? People get extra votes because they consume more resources after fucking their filthy asses off? Up yours.bobevenson wrote:Unfortunately, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. What do you even mean, a parent gets more than one vote. The second, third, fourth or whatever the number of children he has, are being represented by those votes, as goddamn well they should, you fucking Socialist!Dalek Prime wrote:Fuck you. A parent gets more than one vote, twat?bobevenson wrote:Everybody under the political control of a government has an inalienable right to vote. This includes everybody, regardless of physical or mental ability. If unable to vote, a surrogate should be appointed, for instance, the parent of a baby in utero.
-
Philosophy Explorer
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: Who should be denied choice?
Fuck you Boob. Since you've visited my threads in the Lounge, I'm entitled to do the same here and let me remind you dolt, I created this thread so why don't you go back to another forum where you came from, loser?bobevenson wrote:Quit talking nonsense, idiot. Go back to The Lounge where you belong!
PhilX
Re: Who should be denied choice?
Bob, do you have any GOOD ideas... or just insane ones?
-
Philosophy Explorer
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: Who should be denied choice?
I think the term is crackpot.Lacewing wrote:I'm giggling so much my sides are hurting.
Bob, do you have any GOOD ideas... or just insane ones?
PhilX
Re: Who should be denied choice?
Okay, maybe I was too harsh. But sometimes I can't help but wonder how deep/extreme it goes!Philosophy Explorer wrote:I think the term is crackpot.Lacewing wrote:Bob, do you have any GOOD ideas... or just insane ones?
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13975
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: Who should be denied choice?
You would be 'fat' too if you had 8 children. She's not even fat.Dalek Prime wrote: Fuck you Bob. Octomom gets nine votes, the fat ignorant slob? People get extra votes because they consume more resources after fucking their filthy asses off? Up yours.
-
bobevenson
- Posts: 7346
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: Who should be denied choice?
Listen, you giggling bitch, not only are all of my ideas good, they're divinely inspired!Lacewing wrote:I'm giggling so much my sides are hurting. Bob, do you have any GOOD ideas... or just insane ones?
Re: Who should be denied choice?
bobevenson wrote:Listen, you giggling bitch, not only are all of my ideas good, they're divinely inspired!Lacewing wrote:I'm giggling so much my sides are hurting. Bob, do you have any GOOD ideas... or just insane ones?
Stop! Stop! I can't take any more!
-
Philosophy Explorer
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: Who should be denied choice?
Yeah, he gets them out of a Cracker Jack box.bobevenson wrote:Listen, you giggling bitch, not only are all of my ideas good, they're divinely inspired!Lacewing wrote:I'm giggling so much my sides are hurting. Bob, do you have any GOOD ideas... or just insane ones?
PhilX