Is global warming a hoax?: the latest

[Arising_uk]

And you're one to judge? It's you who post such poor thoughts loser. What's going to be your next attempted retort, birdbrain? No wonder why they call you a troll.

'They' now is it? And pray tell who this 'they' are? Can we add Forum PM cliques to your list of misdemeanours now? Still, tell 'them' that I give two tosses for 'their' opinion, as if 'they' are of your ilk then 'they' have studied little to no Philosophy so 'they', like you, have no idea what they are talking about with respect to Philosophy and 'they', like you, should post 'their' prattle where it should be and that's on social-media sites like Twatter or Wastebook. You know, places where view rates and likes are considered the measure of thought and reason. This way 'they and you will satisfy your pointless and puerile need to feel as tho' you are actually saying something of any import and remove yourself from the painful affliction you cause to those who have actually read and studied Philosophy.
All the best,
Arising_uk.

[Philosophy Explorer]

And you're one to judge? It's you who post such poor thoughts loser. What's going to be your next attempted retort, birdbrain? No wonder why they call you a troll.

'They' now is it? And pray tell who this 'they' are? Can we add Forum PM cliques to your list of misdemeanours now? Still, tell 'them' that I give two tosses for 'their' opinion, as if 'they' are of your ilk then 'they' have studied little to no Philosophy so 'they', like you, have no idea what they are talking about with respect to Philosophy and 'they', like you, should post 'their' prattle where it should be and that's on social-media sites like Twatter or Wastebook. You know, places where view rates and likes are considered the measure of thought and reason. This way 'they and you will satisfy your pointless and puerile need to feel as tho' you are actually saying something of any import and remove yourself from the painful affliction you cause to those who have actually read and studied Philosophy.
All the best,
Arising_uk.

Just like a child, trying to get the last word in. You treat this website like FB and other social media where you get your unimportant opinions in. So what's the matter chicken man? So bored that you can't make more productive use of your time instead of trying to belittle threads and posts? Can't put up any worthy threads of your own, you gutless reject from other websites? Let's see how many more "typos" you make which you don't even bother to review, you pathetic loser. I'll be awaiting your next retort.

PhilX

[vegetariantaxidermy]

I've always thought of the foghorn as being reasonable and rather aloof. The opposite of a troll.

[Philosophy Explorer]

I've always thought of the foghorn as being reasonable and rather aloof. The opposite of a troll.

And Time magazine thought Hitler was a great guy. Public opinion holds very little value for me.

PhilX

[artisticsolution]

I've always thought of the foghorn as being reasonable and rather aloof. The opposite of a troll.

I second that. I don't get all the hate towards him. He's just saying....and I never have seen him throw the first punch. Phil, if you don't like having a philosophical discussion complete with having your ideas challenged, then why even bother posting in a philosophy forum?

It's not Arising...it's you. You need to read his words more carefully...

[Philosophy Explorer]

I've always thought of the foghorn as being reasonable and rather aloof. The opposite of a troll.

I second that. I don't get all the hate towards him. He's just saying....and I never have seen him throw the first punch. Phil, if you don't like having a philosophical discussion complete with having your ideas challenged, then why even bother posting in a philosophy forum?

It's not Arising...it's you. You need to read his words more carefully...

Artistic, he did throw the first punch when he brought up about The Onion, a pub that put out a phony story that took me and chicken man in. He's not challenging my idea, he's looking to try to say he doesn't like me putting up links that in his twisted mind are spam as he calls them. There was no need for him to do that and he should have tried to stay on issue instead of going off-topic.

PhilX

[artisticsolution]

I've always thought of the foghorn as being reasonable and rather aloof. The opposite of a troll.

I second that. I don't get all the hate towards him. He's just saying....and I never have seen him throw the first punch. Phil, if you don't like having a philosophical discussion complete with having your ideas challenged, then why even bother posting in a philosophy forum?

It's not Arising...it's you. You need to read his words more carefully...

Artistic, he did throw the first punch when he brought up about The Onion, a pub that put out a phony story that took me and chicken man in. He's not challenging my idea, he's looking to try to say he doesn't like me putting up links that in his twisted mind are spam as he calls them. There was no need for him to do that and he should have tried to stay on issue instead of going off-topic.

PhilX

But Phil, he was just expressing an opinion? Perhaps just ask him to explain to you in a philosophical way what he means by it? There are reasons why he doesn't agree with the article that has nothing to do with you, I think.

I have the feeling you don't want to know the reasons and instead want him to embrace your decision to post it.

I for one never click on your links anymore because they take me to spam sites....it's annoying...like a chain letter. But people who believe something bad is going to happen to them if they don't forward the letter to 25 friends ....usually ignore the fact that it is a mean thing to do to a friend , if one is inclined to believe in such things. Think about it.

It is this lack of foresight on your part that Arising takes issue with, I think. The fact that you can post nonsense and don't see the total lack of regard for people who are interested in serious philosophical inquiry. It speaks volumes. Think about it.

[Philosophy Explorer]

But Phil, he was just expressing an opinion? Perhaps just ask him to explain to you in a philosophical way what he means by it? There are reasons why he doesn't agree with the article that has nothing to do with you, I think.

I have the feeling you don't want to know the reasons and instead want him to embrace your decision to post it.

I for one never click on your links anymore because they take me to spam sites....it's annoying...like a chain letter. But people who believe something bad is going to happen to them if they don't forward the letter to 25 friends ....usually ignore the fact that it is a mean thing to do to a friend , if one is inclined to believe in such things. Think about it.

It is this lack of foresight on your part that Arising takes issue with, I think. The fact that you can post nonsense and don't see the total lack of regard for people who are interested in serious philosophical inquiry. It speaks volumes. Think about it.

Chicken man only looks for mistakes and abuses those who innocently make them and I'm not the only one he does it to. Links, in general, don't take you to spam sites with few exceptions. What really irks him is when he gets caught with his pants down which he'll clutch for any excuses to get out of. Yes chicken man, you make mistakes too.

I don't do chain letters as they're nonsense. Again think about it, why does chicken man come here? To put up worthwhile threads or to try to tear down others?

PhilX

[vegetariantaxidermy]

I've always thought of the foghorn as being reasonable and rather aloof. The opposite of a troll.

And Time magazine thought Hitler was a great guy. Public opinion holds very little value for me.

PhilX

But I'm not the public. Anything but.

[Philosophy Explorer]

I've always thought of the foghorn as being reasonable and rather aloof. The opposite of a troll.

And Time magazine thought Hitler was a great guy. Public opinion holds very little value for me.

PhilX

But I'm not the public. Anything but.

Even one person can be a public.

PhilX

[artisticsolution]

But Phil, he was just expressing an opinion? Perhaps just ask him to explain to you in a philosophical way what he means by it? There are reasons why he doesn't agree with the article that has nothing to do with you, I think.

I have the feeling you don't want to know the reasons and instead want him to embrace your decision to post it.

I for one never click on your links anymore because they take me to spam sites....it's annoying...like a chain letter. But people who believe something bad is going to happen to them if they don't forward the letter to 25 friends ....usually ignore the fact that it is a mean thing to do to a friend , if one is inclined to believe in such things. Think about it.

It is this lack of foresight on your part that Arising takes issue with, I think. The fact that you can post nonsense and don't see the total lack of regard for people who are interested in serious philosophical inquiry. It speaks volumes. Think about it.

Chicken man only looks for mistakes and abuses those who innocently make them and I'm not the only one he does it to. Links, in general, don't take you to spam sites with few exceptions. What really irks him is when he gets caught with his pants down which he'll clutch for any excuses to get out of. Yes chicken man, you make mistakes too.

I don't do chain letters as they're nonsense. Again think about it, why does chicken man come here? To put up worthwhile threads or to try to tear down others?

PhilX

What you are doing is akin to posting chain letters if the link takes you to spam. That you can't understand this is what you are doing is the problem shows you have absolutely no regard for others.

Arising tears down ideas like a philosopher should. It's philosophy, it's not personal.

You are not alone in feeling threatened by a philosopher challenging your ideas....it's the same reason they wanted Socrates dead.

Some people take the tearing down of ideas personally. I think you are making this mistake.

Try not fighting with arising and instead ask him a question in a philosophical way.

You will have your answer , if you dare.

[Philosophy Explorer]

Artistic said:

"What you are doing is akin to posting chain letters if the link takes you to spam."

That's a stretch. And besides that post was off-topic. What chicken man does is under the thin veneer of philosophy as I see very little of that from him.

PhilX

[Arising_uk]

Just like a child, trying to get the last word in. ...

See your contradiction here?

You treat this website like FB and other social media where you get your unimportant opinions in. ...

Who said I thought them important?

So what's the matter chicken man? ...

Very little is the matter.

So bored that you can't make more productive use of your time instead of trying to belittle threads and posts? ...

That you find critique belittling is why you are unsuited to Philosophy. That you think what you do is philosophically productive is just laughable.

Can't put up any worthy threads of your own, you gutless reject from other websites? ...

You think your posts 'worthy'? Unfortunately because I've studied Philosophy I'm fairly well aware of what's been said and what hasn't with respect to many philosophical subjects and cannot post in ignorance such as yourself. So originating a post is something I do very rarely and only when I have something I wish to discuss and test in the crucible of philosophical critique.

Let's see how many more "typos" you make which you don't even bother to review, you pathetic loser. I'll be awaiting your next retort.

Your wait is over.
p.s.
Do a goggle of my nik and you will see that I've pretty much never posted upon any other forum as, unlike you, I feel no need to rush around the philosophical weeb in some weird attempt to bolster my self-esteem and experience has shown me that sooner or later most pass through this 'pub's' door.

[Arising_uk]

... Public opinion holds very little value for me. ...

Apart from 'they' of course.

[Arising_uk]

Artistic, he did throw the first punch when he brought up about The Onion, a pub that put out a phony story that took me and chicken man in. ...

Once again, it did not take me in as I already knew what The Onion was and I'd thought I'd made that clear when I said in my first reply to you, 'I hope you are taking the piss'. In case you weren't I added a link that explained how Birds procreated so that you may see your error in this matter, that you didn't bother to read it was obvious. What I was more interested in was your sentence about the Theory of Evolution and I made the observation that what you said was pretty much a perfect misunderstanding of it and away we went.

He's not challenging my idea, ...

That would be difficult as you very rarely post your ideas but where you do and if I disagree I then challenge them, e.g. in this thread where you pose the question that global warming is a hoax and use an obviously biased-site to give a yes answer, no problem there but the essential evidence in the article you posted did not say it was a hoax, just that the future prediction model may be out by a fairly large factor but you are to caught up in your emotions to hear any of this.

he's looking to try to say he doesn't like me putting up links that in his twisted mind are spam as he calls them. ...

They are essentially spam as they take me to sites that earn revenue from hits, that you don't make money from this is your mistake I think.

There was no need for him to do that and he should have tried to stay on issue instead of going off-topic.

I was on topic, you just ignored it and went for the insult.