Jules VerneJaded Sage wrote:What makes a thought deep?
-Imp
Jules VerneJaded Sage wrote:What makes a thought deep?
Have you heard of the phrase 'falling on deaf ears"?duszek wrote:Why is a man like Hobbes reluctant to provide a sort of answer that Jaded Sage would like to get ?
![]()
This is supposed to be a deep question.
Serious, insightful, complex to understand, requiring thorough thinking and promoting wisdom, mainly in the area of emotional intelligence.
The deep answer to this question that I could produce looks better when not spelled out.
duszek wrote:Is an allusion a deep thought par excellence ?
Same here. I think most of us do. I'd like to have a little bit more though.The Inglorious One wrote:I dunno, but I know it when I see it.Jaded Sage wrote:What makes a thought deep?
An allusion is not easily understood so one needs to make an effort to grasp it.Jaded Sage wrote:duszek wrote:Is an allusion a deep thought par excellence ?
A lot of people keep saying stuff like that. I wholeheartedly disagree. What the hell is that about, lol?
Also I guess there is that stuff about the ineffable. They say it can't be described directly.duszek wrote:An allusion is not easily understood so one needs to make an effort to grasp it.Jaded Sage wrote:duszek wrote:Is an allusion a deep thought par excellence ?
A lot of people keep saying stuff like that. I wholeheartedly disagree. What the hell is that about, lol?
The truth contained in an allusion is hidden like on the bottom of a deep lake.
That´s why the thought is .... deep !
"Short cuts makes for long delays", Bilbo Baggins.duszek wrote:If you are in a hurry make a detour.
A Japanese saying. .
I suppose you mean like serious or playful. I see no reason to think there cannot be a thought that is both playful and deep. Then again, I come to this entire enterprise with an air of playfulness, so maybe it is just I who am playful and not the subject matter. I suppose we can be playful about serious things, but then it doesn't seem to matter much whether the subject is playful or not.duszek wrote:Does a deep though have to be heavy ?
One philosopher was very much against the spirit of heaviness and praised lightness.
He adored dancing girls.
Often, it is good to start by stating certainties. I am certain it does not necessarily follow from that definition that a deep thought must be simple.A_Seagull wrote:IMO A deep thought is one that has many implications and perhaps alters one's perception of the world.
In this definition, a deep thought would necessarily have to be simple, yet powerful.