Marriage should have no legal significance.

How should society be organised, if at all?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by bobevenson »

Marriage exists for the protection of children, wives, and property? Where the hell was that ever chiseled in granite or written in the Magna Carta or the U.S. Constitution? That may be your opinion, but it's not the opinion of the American Energy Party (AEP).
User avatar
Harbal
Posts: 10729
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 10:03 pm
Location: Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by Harbal »

bobevenson wrote:Marriage exists for the protection of children, wives, and property? Where the hell was that ever chiseled in granite or written in the Magna Carta or the U.S. Constitution? That may be your opinion, but it's not the opinion of the American Energy Party (AEP).
You strike me as the sort of person who can't be reasoned with.
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by bobevenson »

You strike me as the kind of person who can't answer a question or support his own argument.
User avatar
Harbal
Posts: 10729
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 10:03 pm
Location: Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by Harbal »

bobevenson wrote:You strike me as the kind of person who can't answer a question or support his own argument.
Yes, that sounds like a fair assessment.
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by bobevenson »

Harbal wrote:
bobevenson wrote:You strike me as the kind of person who can't answer a question or support his own argument.
Yes, that sounds like a fair assessment.
Well, I'm glad I've finally found somebody around this joint who agrees with me!
User avatar
Harbal
Posts: 10729
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 10:03 pm
Location: Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by Harbal »

bobevenson wrote: Well, I'm glad I've finally found somebody around this joint who agrees with me!
Since I was aware of the kind of person I am before you were, I think it is you who are agreeing with me.
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by bobevenson »

Harbal wrote:
bobevenson wrote: Well, I'm glad I've finally found somebody around this joint who agrees with me!
Since I was aware of the kind of person I am before you were, I think it is you who are agreeing with me.
No, I'm sorry, I made a statement, and you said, "Yes, that sounds like a fair assessment." I believe that indicates you are agreeing with me.
User avatar
Harbal
Posts: 10729
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 10:03 pm
Location: Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by Harbal »

bobevenson wrote: No, I'm sorry, I made a statement, and you said, "Yes, that sounds like a fair assessment." I believe that indicates you are agreeing with me.
OK. I'll let you have it.
Obvious Leo
Posts: 4007
Joined: Wed May 13, 2015 1:05 am
Location: Australia

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by Obvious Leo »

Harbal wrote:OK. I'll let you have it.
A wise strategic move and the only known method of getting him to shut his gob.
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by bobevenson »

The recent 5-4 Supreme Court decision (barely a majority and representing the wide disagreement on the issue among Americans) declaring homosexual marriage valid in all 50 states, only amplifies the AEP position that the term "marriage" has no place in government legislation. Marriage licenses and mandatory blood tests should be immediately abolished as serving no legitimate purpose whatsoever.
Melchior
Posts: 839
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 3:20 pm

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by Melchior »

bobevenson wrote:The recent 5-4 Supreme Court decision (barely a majority and representing the wide disagreement on the issue among Americans) declaring homosexual marriage valid in all 50 states, only amplifies the AEP position that the term "marriage" has no place in government legislation. Marriage licenses and mandatory blood tests should be immediately abolished as serving no legitimate purpose whatsoever.
Given that most people believe being married to more than one person at a time is a bad idea....I think you're mistaken.
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by bobevenson »

Melchior wrote:
bobevenson wrote:The recent 5-4 Supreme Court decision (barely a majority and representing the wide disagreement on the issue among Americans) declaring homosexual marriage valid in all 50 states, only amplifies the AEP position that the term "marriage" has no place in government legislation. Marriage licenses and mandatory blood tests should be immediately abolished as serving no legitimate purpose whatsoever.
Given that most people believe being married to more than one person at a time is a bad idea....I think you're mistaken.
It doesn't matter what most people think. Do you want your life run by what most people think?
thedoc
Posts: 6465
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 4:18 pm

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by thedoc »

bobevenson wrote: Marriage licenses and mandatory blood tests should be immediately abolished as serving no legitimate purpose whatsoever.
The blood tests screen for STD's and serve a useful function. To my knowledge they don't bar marriage, but only recommend treatment for the disease. So the blood test serves a medical purpose.
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by bobevenson »

thedoc wrote:
bobevenson wrote: Marriage licenses and mandatory blood tests should be immediately abolished as serving no legitimate purpose whatsoever.
The blood tests screen for STD's and serve a useful function. To my knowledge they don't bar marriage, but only recommend treatment for the disease. So the blood test serves a medical purpose.
The government does not demand blood tests for people shacking up or having casual sex, so the entire policy is fraudulent.
Dalek Prime
Posts: 4922
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
Location: Living in a tree with Polly.

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by Dalek Prime »

Common law should have no legal significance, not marriage. Common law forces one into a marriage-alike, though the people involved have purposefully decided against marriage.
Post Reply