Marriage should have no legal significance.

How should society be organised, if at all?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by bobevenson »

Marriage is merely a cultural phenomenon that should convey no legal prerogatives. The term should not even be used by the government.
Melchior
Posts: 839
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 3:20 pm

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by Melchior »

Marriage exists for the protection of children, wives, and property.
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by bobevenson »

Melchior wrote:Marriage exists for the protection of children, wives, and property.
That is not a proper function of government, my friend.
Melchior
Posts: 839
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 3:20 pm

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by Melchior »

bobevenson wrote:
Melchior wrote:Marriage exists for the protection of children, wives, and property.
That is not a proper function of government, my friend.
It certainly is!
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by bobevenson »

Melchior wrote:
bobevenson wrote:
Melchior wrote:Marriage exists for the protection of children, wives, and property.
That is not a proper function of government, my friend.
It certainly is!
It is not; the only proper function of government is social integration as I have discussed in detail on many occasions!
Melchior
Posts: 839
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 3:20 pm

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by Melchior »

bobevenson wrote: It is not; the only proper function of government is social integration as I have discussed in detail on many occasions!
Social integration? What the fuck is that?
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by bobevenson »

As I have said many times before, the only proper function of government is social integration, like a traffic cop keeping people from running onto each other. I won't elaborate since it's like talking to a wall.
Melchior
Posts: 839
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 3:20 pm

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by Melchior »

bobevenson wrote:As I have said many times before, the only proper function of government is social integration, like a traffic cop keeping people from running onto each other. I won't elaborate since it's like talking to a wall.
That makes no sense. Learn English, you moron.
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by bobevenson »

Melchior wrote:
bobevenson wrote:As I have said many times before, the only proper function of government is social integration, like a traffic cop keeping people from running onto each other. I won't elaborate since it's like talking to a wall.
That makes no sense. Learn English, you moron.
Jesus Christ, are you fucking nuts or just plain stupid???
Melchior
Posts: 839
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 3:20 pm

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by Melchior »

bobevenson wrote:
Melchior wrote:
bobevenson wrote:As I have said many times before, the only proper function of government is social integration, like a traffic cop keeping people from running onto each other. I won't elaborate since it's like talking to a wall.
That makes no sense. Learn English, you moron.
Jesus Christ, are you fucking nuts or just plain stupid???

No, you are!
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by bobevenson »

Maybe the writing was too small for you to read. Is this better?

As I have said many times before, the only proper function of government is social integration, like a traffic cop keeping people from running into each other. I won't elaborate since it's like talking to a wall, a very dumb wall, indeed.
Melchior
Posts: 839
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 3:20 pm

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by Melchior »

bobevenson wrote:Maybe the writing was too small for you to read. Is this better?

As I have said many times before, the only proper function of government is social integration, like a traffic cop keeping people from running into each other. I won't elaborate since it's like talking to a wall, a very dumb wall, indeed.

That's not what 'social integration' means, dumbass! The term you want is 'civil order'.
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by bobevenson »

You're telling a prophet the definition of words? Good luck, motherfucker!
Last edited by bobevenson on Sat Jun 27, 2015 7:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Melchior
Posts: 839
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 3:20 pm

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by Melchior »

bobevenson wrote:You're telling a prophet the definition of words? Good luck, mother fucker!
Yes, I am, because you are clueless!
User avatar
Harbal
Posts: 10729
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 10:03 pm
Location: Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Post by Harbal »

Melchior wrote:
bobevenson wrote:
Melchior wrote:Marriage exists for the protection of children, wives, and property.
That is not a proper function of government, my friend.
It certainly is!
He's right. It is.
Post Reply