Marriage should have no legal significance.
-
bobevenson
- Posts: 7346
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Marriage should have no legal significance.
Marriage is merely a cultural phenomenon that should convey no legal prerogatives. The term should not even be used by the government.
Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.
Marriage exists for the protection of children, wives, and property.
-
bobevenson
- Posts: 7346
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.
That is not a proper function of government, my friend.Melchior wrote:Marriage exists for the protection of children, wives, and property.
Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.
It certainly is!bobevenson wrote:That is not a proper function of government, my friend.Melchior wrote:Marriage exists for the protection of children, wives, and property.
-
bobevenson
- Posts: 7346
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.
It is not; the only proper function of government is social integration as I have discussed in detail on many occasions!Melchior wrote:It certainly is!bobevenson wrote:That is not a proper function of government, my friend.Melchior wrote:Marriage exists for the protection of children, wives, and property.
Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.
Social integration? What the fuck is that?bobevenson wrote: It is not; the only proper function of government is social integration as I have discussed in detail on many occasions!
-
bobevenson
- Posts: 7346
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.
As I have said many times before, the only proper function of government is social integration, like a traffic cop keeping people from running onto each other. I won't elaborate since it's like talking to a wall.
Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.
That makes no sense. Learn English, you moron.bobevenson wrote:As I have said many times before, the only proper function of government is social integration, like a traffic cop keeping people from running onto each other. I won't elaborate since it's like talking to a wall.
-
bobevenson
- Posts: 7346
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.
Jesus Christ, are you fucking nuts or just plain stupid???Melchior wrote:That makes no sense. Learn English, you moron.bobevenson wrote:As I have said many times before, the only proper function of government is social integration, like a traffic cop keeping people from running onto each other. I won't elaborate since it's like talking to a wall.
Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.
bobevenson wrote:Jesus Christ, are you fucking nuts or just plain stupid???Melchior wrote:That makes no sense. Learn English, you moron.bobevenson wrote:As I have said many times before, the only proper function of government is social integration, like a traffic cop keeping people from running onto each other. I won't elaborate since it's like talking to a wall.
No, you are!
-
bobevenson
- Posts: 7346
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.
Maybe the writing was too small for you to read. Is this better?
As I have said many times before, the only proper function of government is social integration, like a traffic cop keeping people from running into each other. I won't elaborate since it's like talking to a wall, a very dumb wall, indeed.
As I have said many times before, the only proper function of government is social integration, like a traffic cop keeping people from running into each other. I won't elaborate since it's like talking to a wall, a very dumb wall, indeed.
Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.
bobevenson wrote:Maybe the writing was too small for you to read. Is this better?
As I have said many times before, the only proper function of government is social integration, like a traffic cop keeping people from running into each other. I won't elaborate since it's like talking to a wall, a very dumb wall, indeed.
That's not what 'social integration' means, dumbass! The term you want is 'civil order'.
-
bobevenson
- Posts: 7346
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
- Contact:
Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.
You're telling a prophet the definition of words? Good luck, motherfucker!
Last edited by bobevenson on Sat Jun 27, 2015 7:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.
Yes, I am, because you are clueless!bobevenson wrote:You're telling a prophet the definition of words? Good luck, mother fucker!
Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.
He's right. It is.Melchior wrote:It certainly is!bobevenson wrote:That is not a proper function of government, my friend.Melchior wrote:Marriage exists for the protection of children, wives, and property.