Authenticity: Keeping It Real And Then Some

Discussion of articles that appear in the magazine.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Wyman
Posts: 973
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 2:21 pm

Re: Authenticity: Keeping It Real And Then Some

Post by Wyman »

HexHammer wrote:
Wyman wrote:If you posted 1648 (at last count) fake posts as a crazy Danish IT retiree then HexHammer is who we always thought him to be - an unhinged troll with way too much time on his hands!
I'm not an IT guy, quite the contrary. :roll:
Oh yeah, you're Mr. Abuse, behind door number one:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdoGVgj1MtY
User avatar
HexHammer
Posts: 3353
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 8:19 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: Authenticity: Keeping It Real And Then Some

Post by HexHammer »

Wyman wrote:
HexHammer wrote:
Wyman wrote:If you posted 1648 (at last count) fake posts as a crazy Danish IT retiree then HexHammer is who we always thought him to be - an unhinged troll with way too much time on his hands!
I'm not an IT guy, quite the contrary. :roll:
Oh yeah, you're Mr. Abuse, behind door number one:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdoGVgj1MtY
Well, if people said something slightly intelligent, I wouldn't abuse.
..but then again, that would be too demanding for 99% of all these cozy chatters.
SiobhanL
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 7:32 am

Re: Authenticity: Keeping It Real And Then Some

Post by SiobhanL »

HexHammer wrote:
SiobhanL wrote:Really? I am so gullible! I was so taken aback by some of those posts and didn't second guess them for a second :oops: . I must be such a pessimist to think that there would actually be someone who would spend all that time posting such extreme things (and yes, I did notice that Hex's comments were getting more aggressive). In any case, I'm kind of relieved to find out that Hex doesn't exist (on this forum, at least) :). Although his/her presence did make me think a lot about arguments around free speech, especially in philosophy debates, and the whole 'tolerant of intolerance' concept...so well done there! You certainly got me thinking.
You might note that I've heavily criticized RickLewis's magazine for being tragically low quality, and you can evidently observe in this thread that his debating skills are equally tragically low, when he has to resort to blatant lies and ridicule.
No wonder Hex's grammar was so poor, especially for someone who seemed to have such strong views regarding philosophy. I just thought he was an idiot!
Dalek Prime
Posts: 4922
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
Location: Living in a tree with Polly.

Re: Authenticity: Keeping It Real And Then Some

Post by Dalek Prime »

Well, so far, HH hasn't been rude to me. In one case, he was complimentary. And I consider myself a cozy chatter... Or maybe just a bored one. :idea:
User avatar
HexHammer
Posts: 3353
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 8:19 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: Authenticity: Keeping It Real And Then Some

Post by HexHammer »

SiobhanL wrote:No wonder Hex's grammar was so poor, especially for someone who seemed to have such strong views regarding philosophy. I just thought he was an idiot!
Better an idiot, than a retard like you.
marjoram_blues
Posts: 1629
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 12:50 pm

Re: Authenticity: Keeping It Real And Then Some

Post by marjoram_blues »

Dalek Prime wrote:Well, so far, HH hasn't been rude to me. In one case, he was complimentary. And I consider myself a cozy chatter... Or maybe just a bored one. :idea:
HH is a closet cozy chatterbox. He watches, then pushes in and out of discussions at whim. He likes to confound by sometimes showing evidence of an underlying intelligence and good humour. On the whole, his interjections are negative. Shame, because it gets him nowhere.

NB how he has used this and other PN articles to have yet another natter about his obsession.
Let's see if he can get out of his rut and make a positive contribution. Perhaps in the form of an article, or essay 'Concerning Philosophy Now'.

Enough of the Hex. This thread is not about him, or Rick.
marjoram_blues
Posts: 1629
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 12:50 pm

Re: Authenticity: Keeping It Real And Then Some

Post by marjoram_blues »

HexHammer wrote:
SiobhanL wrote:No wonder Hex's grammar was so poor, especially for someone who seemed to have such strong views regarding philosophy. I just thought he was an idiot!
Better an idiot, than a retard like you.
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=13277
This forum has previously operated on a kind of unwritten constitution, but we have recently had to introduce a few basic rules, so it seems only fair to summarise them somewhere easy to find. These rules will be revised as necessary, but we will aim for laconic brevity. Please send suggestions to me or one of the mods (AMod and iMod). Thanks everyone.

Rule 1) Please be nice to one another and attempt to treat each other as adults.

Rule 2) Anyone misusing the PM system to send threatening or aggressive messages to another user will be banned.

Rule 3) Although there may be genuine philosophical and ethical questions regarding sexuality and young people, we do not allow any discussion of such questions anywhere on this forum. Any attempt to do so will result in thread deletions and eventually in permanent bans for those involved. This rule will be strictly enforced.

Rule 4) Members when posting should comply with any requests specific to them which have been made to them by mods or admins. If they fail to do so then they may be banned without further warning.

Rule 5) There is no Rule 5. (so far)

The guiding metaphor of this forum is that this is a pub, where freewheeling discussion is encouraged but troublemakers are thrown out and the landlord has the final say. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pub (We regret that this forum is not licensed for the sale of alcoholic beverages).
SiobhanL
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 7:32 am

Re: Authenticity: Keeping It Real And Then Some

Post by SiobhanL »

marjoram_blues wrote:
HexHammer wrote:
SiobhanL wrote:No wonder Hex's grammar was so poor, especially for someone who seemed to have such strong views regarding philosophy. I just thought he was an idiot!
Better an idiot, than a retard like you.
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=13277
This forum has previously operated on a kind of unwritten constitution, but we have recently had to introduce a few basic rules, so it seems only fair to summarise them somewhere easy to find. These rules will be revised as necessary, but we will aim for laconic brevity. Please send suggestions to me or one of the mods (AMod and iMod). Thanks everyone.

Rule 1) Please be nice to one another and attempt to treat each other as adults.

Rule 2) Anyone misusing the PM system to send threatening or aggressive messages to another user will be banned.

Rule 3) Although there may be genuine philosophical and ethical questions regarding sexuality and young people, we do not allow any discussion of such questions anywhere on this forum. Any attempt to do so will result in thread deletions and eventually in permanent bans for those involved. This rule will be strictly enforced.

Rule 4) Members when posting should comply with any requests specific to them which have been made to them by mods or admins. If they fail to do so then they may be banned without further warning.

Rule 5) There is no Rule 5. (so far)

The guiding metaphor of this forum is that this is a pub, where freewheeling discussion is encouraged but troublemakers are thrown out and the landlord has the final say. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pub (We regret that this forum is not licensed for the sale of alcoholic beverages).
Hear, hear!
Locked