Even I consider myself a cultural Christian, my parents being nominally Anglican, and the wider society being of a Christian heritage and character, though I was not raised to be anything, and left free to choose my own belief path, though I couldn't help but be influenced by that wider cultural environment.ReliStuPhD wrote:Agreed. We call them "cultural Christians" (Muslims, Buddhists, etc) in the Religious Studies field. They follow their religion because they were raised to, not because of any deep-seated belief.Melchior wrote:One can be a church-going 'Christian' and be an atheist.
Do atheists read the primary sources?
-
Dalek Prime
- Posts: 4922
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
- Location: Living in a tree with Polly.
Re: Do atheists read the primary sources?
Last edited by Dalek Prime on Sun May 31, 2015 4:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Do atheists read the primary sources?
There is no reason needlessly to antagonize relatives and friends by denouncing Christianity at Christmas, for instance. It's uncouth.ReliStuPhD wrote:Agreed. We call them "cultural Christians" (Muslims, Buddhists, etc) in the Religious Studies field. They follow their religion because they were raised to, not because of any deep-seated belief.Melchior wrote:One can be a church-going 'Christian' and be an atheist.
Last edited by Melchior on Sun May 31, 2015 4:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Dalek Prime
- Posts: 4922
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
- Location: Living in a tree with Polly.
Re: Do atheists read the primary sources?
Where the heck did that come from, Melchior?Melchior wrote:There is no reason needlessly to antagonize relatives and friends by denouncing Christianity at Christmas. It's uncouth.ReliStuPhD wrote:Agreed. We call them "cultural Christians" (Muslims, Buddhists, etc) in the Religious Studies field. They follow their religion because they were raised to, not because of any deep-seated belief.Melchior wrote:One can be a church-going 'Christian' and be an atheist.
- ReliStuPhD
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2015 5:28 pm
Re: Do atheists read the primary sources?
Melchior wrote:There is no reason needlessly to antagonize relatives and friends by denouncing Christianity at Christmas. It's uncouth.ReliStuPhD wrote:Agreed. We call them "cultural Christians" (Muslims, Buddhists, etc) in the Religious Studies field. They follow their religion because they were raised to, not because of any deep-seated belief.Melchior wrote:One can be a church-going 'Christian' and be an atheist.
-
Dalek Prime
- Posts: 4922
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
- Location: Living in a tree with Polly.
Re: Do atheists read the primary sources?
Still don't get it. Who's denouncing Chritianity at the family Christmas dinner? And is it okay if it's Christmas, and your at home with your Hindu, Muslim, Jewish, Sikh, Jainist, Buddhist, Atheist, Shinto, Taoist or Zoroastrian family? You guys have no idea how insular and closed minded that sounds to anyone outside your belief system, because you live in a culture predominantly made up of people like you ie. culturally Christian.
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: Do atheists read the primary sources?
Despite the fall of religion and religious practice, there is still a knee jerk reaction to the census form when it asks which religion.Obvious Leo wrote:Practically every rural village or country town in regional Australia has one or more churches of various Christian denomination, all of which were built well over a century ago. Almost all of these have now been converted to up-market B&B's or boutique art and craft galleries. The few little old ladies still interested in such entertainments nowadays often need to travel substantial distances to socialise with others of similar interest. In country areas at least religious belief is almost universally regarded as a quaint cultural remnant of a forgotten past. In the capital cities the situation is somewhat different because of the influx in recent decades of migrants from the Muslim world. However this will only last for a generation or so. The first generation migrants may be anxious to stay fast to their cultural traditions but their kids will be more interested in the sport, booze, dope and naked women on the beaches. One could hardly blame them.
Despite a brief and wonderful instance of a rise in "Jedi" especially in my home town, the banning of that answer by the authorities has not dimmed the rise of "none", if the census form includes such an option. Most people tick the religion of their parents despite not meeting the minimum requirement of attendance at a place of worship (now reduced to birth, marriage and death).
In practical terms, the religiosity of the average census nominated "Christian" from 100 years ago compared to today, the rate of people who would have been seen as atheist now would put them in the majority.
Maybe god has changed to stand by allowing this permissiveness?
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: Do atheists read the primary sources?
Lots of people have very good reason to denounce Xity at the dinner table and do.Dalek Prime wrote:Still don't get it. Who's denouncing Chritianity at the family Christmas dinner? And is it okay if it's Christmas, and your at home with your Hindu, Muslim, Jewish, Sikh, Jainist, Buddhist, Atheist, Shinto, Taoist or Zoroastrian family? You guys have no idea how insular and closed minded that sounds to anyone outside your belief system, because you live in a culture predominantly made up of people like you ie. culturally Christian.
And when has Christmas had anything to do with religion?
But i'm not sure what point you are making here.
-
Dalek Prime
- Posts: 4922
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
- Location: Living in a tree with Polly.
Re: Do atheists read the primary sources?
I was replying to Melchior's post.Hobbes' Choice wrote:Lots of people have very good reason to denounce Xity at the dinner table and do.Dalek Prime wrote:Still don't get it. Who's denouncing Chritianity at the family Christmas dinner? And is it okay if it's Christmas, and your at home with your Hindu, Muslim, Jewish, Sikh, Jainist, Buddhist, Atheist, Shinto, Taoist or Zoroastrian family? You guys have no idea how insular and closed minded that sounds to anyone outside your belief system, because you live in a culture predominantly made up of people like you ie. culturally Christian.
And when has Christmas had anything to do with religion?
But i'm not sure what point you are making here.
There is no reason needlessly to antagonize relatives and friends by denouncing Christianity at Christmas, for instance. It's uncouth
-
Obvious Leo
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Wed May 13, 2015 1:05 am
- Location: Australia
Re: Do atheists read the primary sources?
It's not often I find myself on the same side of the fence as Melchior but I surely do on this occasion. I see no reason to denounce the festivals of any religion just because we smirk at the primitive beliefs which underpin them. In my country Xmas has religious significance to only a tiny minority of the population but it has a cultural significance to almost everybody, INCLUDING many who actively practice non-Christian faiths. Xmas in Australia is all about family togetherness and bonding and these are traditional values with very ancient roots which should never be casually dismissed as irrelevant. For most people it's just an opportunity to drink too much and make fools of themselves in an environment where they can do so without being too harshly judged for their foibles.Melchior wrote: There is no reason needlessly to antagonize relatives and friends by denouncing Christianity at Christmas, for instance. It's uncouth.
I've always admired the US tradition of Thanksgiving, which seems to serve the same cultural purpose without all the vulgar trappings of commercialism. This was also once an exclusively religious festival but I very much doubt that many people see it that way nowadays. Perhaps a Yank could correct me if I've read this wrong.
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: Do atheists read the primary sources?
Well that depends. If you get invited, are you allowed to refuse the invitation on the grounds that you don't want to participate in some of the rituals?Obvious Leo wrote:It's not often I find myself on the same side of the fence as Melchior but I surely do on this occasion. I see no reason to denounce the festivals of any religion just because we smirk at the primitive beliefs which underpin them. In my country Xmas has religious significance to only a tiny minority of the population but it has a cultural significance to almost everybody, INCLUDING many who actively practice non-Christian faiths. Xmas in Australia is all about family togetherness and bonding and these are traditional values with very ancient roots which should never be casually dismissed as irrelevant. For most people it's just an opportunity to drink too much and make fools of themselves in an environment where they can do so without being too harshly judged for their foibles.Melchior wrote: There is no reason needlessly to antagonize relatives and friends by denouncing Christianity at Christmas, for instance. It's uncouth.
I've always admired the US tradition of Thanksgiving, which seems to serve the same cultural purpose without all the vulgar trappings of commercialism. This was also once an exclusively religious festival but I very much doubt that many people see it that way nowadays. Perhaps a Yank could correct me if I've read this wrong.
Maybe you are invited to a solstice and don't like seeing an animals slaughtered in the altar? Surely that would be an insult to refuse?
Maybe you are invited to Thanksgiving but are a vegetarian and can't stand turkey?
Or maybe you can't stand people saying "grace".
You silence is taken as acquiescence. That would be a unforgivable stance. So either you are honest or you are insulting. In life you have to make a choice. And traditions need to be abandoned/
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: Do atheists read the primary sources?
You've obviously never been to a Thanksgiving in the USA. There is plenty of commercialism involved.Obvious Leo wrote: I've always admired the US tradition of Thanksgiving, which seems to serve the same cultural purpose without all the vulgar trappings of commercialism. This was also once an exclusively religious festival but I very much doubt that many people see it that way nowadays. Perhaps a Yank could correct me if I've read this wrong.
-
Obvious Leo
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Wed May 13, 2015 1:05 am
- Location: Australia
Re: Do atheists read the primary sources?
Indeed I've never been in the USA at Thanksgiving time and I was unaware of this. My illusions have been shattered and it seems the shopkeepers have in fact taken over the world.Hobbes' Choice wrote: You've obviously never been to a Thanksgiving in the USA. There is plenty of commercialism involved.
If such rituals conflicted with my own personal ethic I would have no choice but to refuse. However in many cases one can attend without participating in the rituals. One of the disadvantages of getting old is that one gets to attend a lot of funerals, many of which are still held in churches regardless of whether either the deceased or the family were churchgoers. I have no problem standing silent in a church without mumbling my way through any of the vacuous prayers because when I look around this is what almost everybody else is doing. Most people just want this bit over with so they can get into the free food and drink and tell a heap of lies about what a shit-hot bloke old Joe was. Funerals are not for the dead. Funerals are for the living, so if I don't go to Joe's funeral he won't come to mine.Hobbes' Choice wrote:Well that depends. If you get invited, are you allowed to refuse the invitation on the grounds that you don't want to participate in some of the rituals?
Actually I'm not a vegetarian AND I can't stand turkey, but I can pig out with the best of them on whatever else might be on offer. If somebody were to invite me I would most certainly accept.Hobbes' Choice wrote:Maybe you are invited to Thanksgiving but are a vegetarian and can't stand turkey?
I haven't sat down to a meal where "grace" has been said since my childhood, and even then this would only have occurred a handful of times. In my country to do such a thing in front of a guest would be regarded as most uncool.Hobbes' Choice wrote:Or maybe you can't stand people saying "grace".
You silence is taken as acquiescence. That would be a unforgivable stance.
Re: Do atheists read the primary sources?
That there's a time and place for everything, dumbass.Hobbes' Choice wrote:Lots of people have very good reason to denounce Xity at the dinner table and do.Dalek Prime wrote:Still don't get it. Who's denouncing Chritianity at the family Christmas dinner? And is it okay if it's Christmas, and your at home with your Hindu, Muslim, Jewish, Sikh, Jainist, Buddhist, Atheist, Shinto, Taoist or Zoroastrian family? You guys have no idea how insular and closed minded that sounds to anyone outside your belief system, because you live in a culture predominantly made up of people like you ie. culturally Christian.
And when has Christmas had anything to do with religion?
But i'm not sure what point you are making here.
-
Dalek Prime
- Posts: 4922
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
- Location: Living in a tree with Polly.
Re: Do atheists read the primary sources?
So funny, Melchior. 
Re: Do atheists read the primary sources?
It would be just like a vegetarian crying and smashing things when they bring out the turkey, calling everyone beastly, cruel, and heartless for destroying this beautiful innocent creature.Dalek Prime wrote:So funny, Melchior.