This is exactly why you are such an idiot.
Go back and read it. Part of the way to tackle racism is to know to what degree different races are treated differently: how they are discriminated against.
And the prime methodology to do this is to gather race statistics. This is exactly what these conferences are all about; and exactly the reason why the British and US governments have the race question on application forms.
TRY AND USE YOUR BRAIN.
Maybe you should try reading?
You are just making a fool of yourself. This is so embarrassing.
The UK is a key player in both the EU and the UN declarations.
This is exactly why you are such an idiot.
Go back and read it. Part of the way to tackle racism is to know to what degree different races are treated differently: how they are discriminated against.
And the prime methodology to do this is to gather race statistics. This is exactly what these conferences are all about; and exactly the reason why the British and US governments have the race question on application forms.
TRY AND USE YOUR BRAIN.
Maybe you should try reading?
You are just making a fool of yourself. This is so embarrassing.
The UK is a key player in both the EU and the UN declarations.
This is exactly why you are such an idiot.
Go back and read it. Part of the way to tackle racism is to know to what degree different races are treated differently: how they are discriminated against.
And the prime methodology to do this is to gather race statistics. This is exactly what these conferences are all about; and exactly the reason why the British and US governments have the race question on application forms.
TRY AND USE YOUR BRAIN.
Maybe you should try reading?
You are just making a fool of yourself. This is so embarrassing.
The UK is a key player in both the EU and the UN declarations.
"degree different races"
Are you sure?
You appear to be getting your facts mixed up.
The more you type the more ridiculous you appear.
"...is to know to what degree different races are treated"
The sentence is perfect.
I can add some unnecessary punctuation for the hard of thinking if you are having trouble.
This is exactly why you are such an idiot.
Go back and read it. Part of the way to tackle racism is to know to what degree different races are treated differently: how they are discriminated against.
And the prime methodology to do this is to gather race statistics. This is exactly what these conferences are all about; and exactly the reason why the British and US governments have the race question on application forms.
TRY AND USE YOUR BRAIN.
Maybe you should try reading?
You are just making a fool of yourself. This is so embarrassing.
The UK is a key player in both the EU and the UN declarations.
What system is used to recognise Race and Ethnicity in the European Union?
What system does the UN use to recognise Race and Ethnicity?
Answer these questions and all will see the point I am making.
lol We tried that and it never happened. It's never going to happen, because you want to pose as the winner in a battle of ideas without taking any risk of losing by actually putting your ideas into the arena.
You've been gone quite a while, BD—just got banned from the new forum you ran away to?
Hobbes' Choice wrote:Are you trying to make a point?
Yes
Answer these questions and all will see the point I am making.
And again;
What system is used to recognise Race and Ethnicity in the European Union?
What system does the UN use to recognise Race and Ethnicity?
The system, such as it is (if you can call it that) is based loosely on what people tend to use in terms of self-identification. As such it is a kind of collective-subjectivity. Identity is based on traditional prejudices, and is not at all scientific.
Hobbes' Choice wrote:Are you trying to make a point?
Yes
Answer these questions and all will see the point I am making.
And again;
What system is used to recognise Race and Ethnicity in the European Union?
What system does the UN use to recognise Race and Ethnicity?
The system, such as it is (if you can call it that) is based loosely on what people tend to use in terms of self-identification. As such it is a kind of collective-subjectivity. Identity is based on traditional prejudices, and is not at all scientific.
We have all discussed and seen evidence of the British system of Racial and Ethnic identification.
We all have no doubt that such a system of, Racial and Ethnic identification exists in the British Government.
We are not discussing whether the British system for Racial and Ethnic identification is scientific or not. We are looking for evidence of the existence of a system of Racial and Ethnic identification in the UN and EU.
You appear to believe that the UN and the EU have similar systems.
and again
1. What system is used to recognise Race and Ethnicity in the European Union?
2. What system does the United Nations use to recognise Race and Ethnicity?
Hobbes' Choice wrote:
This is exactly why you are such an idiot.
Go back and read it. Part of the way to tackle racism is to know to what degree different races are treated differently: how they are discriminated against.
And the prime methodology to do this is to gather race statistics. This is exactly what these conferences are all about; and exactly the reason why the British and US governments have the race question on application forms.
TRY AND USE YOUR BRAIN.
Maybe you should try reading?
You are just making a fool of yourself. This is so embarrassing.
The UK is a key player in both the EU and the UN declarations.
Brit Dems wrote:
1. What system is used to recognise Race and Ethnicity in the European Union?
2. What system does the United Nations use to recognise Race and Ethnicity?
I just told you, arse.
Don't fucking shout at me.
Pathetic
I think you owe the readers an apology.
The system, such as it is (if you can call it that) is based loosely on what people tend to use in terms of self-identification. As such it is a kind of collective-subjectivity.
Brit Dems wrote:
1. What system is used to recognise Race and Ethnicity in the European Union?
2. What system does the United Nations use to recognise Race and Ethnicity?
I just told you, arse.
Don't fucking shout at me.
Pathetic
I think you owe the readers an apology.
The system, such as it is (if you can call it that) is based loosely on what people tend to use in terms of self-identification. As such it is a kind of collective-subjectivity.
Well duh!
That is because there is no such thing as race in any meaningful scientific way.
All humans can and do marry have children together, they have done this since before they were even human.
Race is a social category and not a scientific or systematic one.
Now run along.
BTW: I owe no one an apology. You have no "readers"
Well duh!
That is because there is no such thing as race in any meaningful scientific way.
All humans can and do marry have children together, they have done this since before they were even human.
Race is a social category and not a scientific or systematic one.
Now run along.
BTW: I owe no one an apology. You have no "readers"
Try telling all that to the British Government. Race and Ethnicity is meaningful to the UK AND US Governments.
Now you should apologise to the readers for your disappointing performance in this thread.
Please do not lower the high standard that is being maintained.
