~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

How should society be organised, if at all?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

artisticsolution
Posts: 1933
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:38 am

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by artisticsolution »

Bill Wiltrack wrote: Females produce milk.

Men produce large amounts of testosterone.


Women therefore are nurturing.

THAT'S nature. You can't change that.


That is what my logic is based upon; Logic & nature.[/size]

.
So using your 'logic & nature' argument above, do you believe that homosexuality is not "natural" since two men can't procreate?
Last edited by artisticsolution on Fri Apr 10, 2015 1:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Bill Wiltrack
Posts: 5456
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:52 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Contact:

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by Bill Wiltrack »

.





.............................................
Image


I realize that homosexuality, lesbianism, bi-sexually, heterosexuality, & ALL flavors in-between are natural.

Why wouldn't it be?






.........................................................
Image





.
artisticsolution
Posts: 1933
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:38 am

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by artisticsolution »

Bill Wiltrack wrote:.



I realize that homosexuality, lesbianism, bi-sexually, heterosexuality, & ALL flavors in-between are natural.

Why wouldn't it be?



.

Well, that's a relief. I am just very confused because I thought you were more liberal than to keep up the stereo type that woman are nurturing and men are not. So, this prejudice of yours only pertains to women. Men can be anything they want and it's 'Nature' in your book, eh?

You know ,it is perfectly 'natural' for a man to feed his baby a bottle. That's nurturing if you ask me.

The way you think about women scares the b'jesus out of me. It always has oissed me off...when men see women as a source of their comfort. As if we were put on this earth to serve them!
User avatar
Bill Wiltrack
Posts: 5456
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:52 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Contact:

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by Bill Wiltrack »

.




In general, women are more nurturing. That's not a prejudice. It's just fact.





.
User avatar
Bill Wiltrack
Posts: 5456
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:52 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Contact:

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by Bill Wiltrack »

.


Just think America is ripe for a woman President. I don't care who it is...whatever party the first woman nominee is with - it just doesn't matter to me.




........................................................
.Image


Doesn't even matter to me if she is a dyke...as one of the active members implied.


Let's just hope for a change, hope for an opportunity to help a woman become President of these United States of America!

Let's give the female sector of society a legible voice. Whoever that voice may be.

Men have fucked things up long enough.

I am MORE THAN READY to take a chance upon the female perspective.





.
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by bobevenson »

Arising_uk wrote:
GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:Bill is a woman using her husbands name. Like most women, she does not know too much about politics, or even the minds of other women.
I'm surprised you take this tack as I'd say there's a question mark about your gender.
Speaking of question-mark gender, maybe it's time to discuss your first name again.
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by Arising_uk »

Bill Wiltrack wrote:. In general, women are more nurturing. That's not a prejudice. It's just fact. .
Maybe for those men who've not bothered to have children.
User avatar
Bill Wiltrack
Posts: 5456
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:52 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Contact:

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by Bill Wiltrack »

.



........................................................
Image




I don't have any children of my own...but I was raised in a family with both parents.

I have to stick with the fact that women are more nurturing and socially conscious.

As the world evolves from pure capitalism to a more universal socialism, I believe the instinctual traits of the female will be more beneficial to this transition.




.....................................
Image





.
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by Arising_uk »

Bill Wiltrack wrote:I don't have any children of my own...but I was raised in a family with both parents..
How much time did your father spend raising you?
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by bobevenson »

Bill Wiltrack wrote:As the world evolves from pure capitalism to a more universal socialism...
Bill, why don't you move to Europe where you'll feel more at home?
User avatar
Bill Wiltrack
Posts: 5456
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:52 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Contact:

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by Bill Wiltrack »

.



This thread isn't about me - It's TIME For a Woman to be in the White House - PERIOD!


And that is where we are at in this thread and as a nation.




.
User avatar
Hobbes' Choice
Posts: 8360
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by Hobbes' Choice »

Bill Wiltrack wrote:.



This thread isn't about me - It's TIME For a Woman to be in the White House - PERIOD!


And that is where we are at in this thread and as a nation.




.
You are brain dead.
User avatar
Bill Wiltrack
Posts: 5456
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:52 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Contact:

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by Bill Wiltrack »

.


um,...don't know if you were able to see the first part of my last post but...this thread isn't about me.

It's about a topic. A DEEP PHILOSOPHICAL TOPIC.

Okay, I it would be a lot easier & safer for me to be more superficial - to stay away from the DEEP PHILOSOPHICAL TOPICS. But that's NOT who I am.

Look, I've been voted time & time again as the best philosopher upon this site. NOT because I wanted to be - shit I DON'T EVEN CARE ABOUT THE ACCOLADES.

I just need to ask the tough questions. Yeah, I get it - not everyone can stay with me on a philosophical level but THAT CANNOT STOP ME.


Thank you for attempting to participate upon this particular thread.




.
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by bobevenson »

Bill Wiltrack wrote: This thread is about a topic. A DEEP PHILOSOPHICAL TOPIC. Have you lost your fucking mind???
Look, I've been voted time & time again as the best philosopher upon this site. Yup!!!
Post Reply