~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

How should society be organised, if at all?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by Arising_uk »

GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:Bill is a woman using her husbands name. Like most women, she does not know too much about politics, or even the minds of other women.
I'm surprised you take this tack as I'd say there's a question mark about your gender.
User avatar
Bill Wiltrack
Posts: 5456
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:52 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Contact:

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by Bill Wiltrack »

.







.....................................................
Image






.
User avatar
GreatandWiseTrixie
Posts: 1543
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:51 pm

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by GreatandWiseTrixie »

Arising_uk wrote:
GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:Bill is a woman using her husbands name. Like most women, she does not know too much about politics, or even the minds of other women.
I'm surprised you take this tack as I'd say there's a question mark about your gender.
I could care less. I am no man nor no woman. I don't belong on this planet.
Bill Wiltrack wrote:.







..............................................................
Image




Females produce milk.

Men produce large amounts of testosterone.


Women therefore are nurturing.

THAT'S nature. You can't change that.


That is what my logic is based upon; Logic & nature.
Since when do humans follow the path of nature (Earth nature)?
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by Arising_uk »

GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:I could care less. I am no man nor no woman. ...
Doubt this.
I don't belong on this planet.
Which planet do you belong on?
User avatar
GreatandWiseTrixie
Posts: 1543
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:51 pm

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by GreatandWiseTrixie »

Arising_uk wrote:
GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:I could care less. I am no man nor no woman. ...
Doubt this.
I don't belong on this planet.
Which planet do you belong on?
Presumably, all of the good planets have been destroyed or unavailiable, so im stuck on this one.
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by Arising_uk »

GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:Presumably, all of the good planets have been destroyed or unavailiable, so im stuck on this one.
Since you evolved on this one I'd say it's pretty much the best one for you.
User avatar
GreatandWiseTrixie
Posts: 1543
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:51 pm

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by GreatandWiseTrixie »

Arising_uk wrote:
GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:Presumably, all of the good planets have been destroyed or unavailiable, so im stuck on this one.
Since you evolved on this one I'd say it's pretty much the best one for you.
Ridiculous statement really. If a species go through the hardship of natural selection over eons, does such a species give thanks to the non-existent god that provided this hardship?
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by Arising_uk »

GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:Ridiculous statement really. If a species go through the hardship of natural selection over eons, does such a species give thanks to the non-existent god that provided this hardship?
Who said anything about 'gods'? Existent or not. You said all the good planets have been destroyed or unavailable(although what you mean by this I have little idea?) and I just pointed-out that best planet for you is the one you've evolved for.
User avatar
GreatandWiseTrixie
Posts: 1543
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:51 pm

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by GreatandWiseTrixie »

Arising_uk wrote:
GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:Ridiculous statement really. If a species go through the hardship of natural selection over eons, does such a species give thanks to the non-existent god that provided this hardship?
Who said anything about 'gods'? Existent or not. You said all the good planets have been destroyed or unavailable(although what you mean by this I have little idea?) and I just pointed-out that best planet for you is the one you've evolved for.
Life is a battle of inches, always has been. I don't see how battling for resources is my idea of a good time. Life is a laughable joke, little beings rushing to constantly find food sex and water before they lose the game, like a mad dash or party gag, which is rarely fun at first and gets even worse as time goes on, like a 2 dollar garbage indie game.
Pluto
Posts: 1856
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 9:26 pm
Location: Belgium

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by Pluto »

Life is a horror show but...
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by Arising_uk »

GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:Life is a battle of inches, always has been. I don't see how battling for resources is my idea of a good time.
You hardly battle for resources in your part of the world.
Life is a laughable joke,
And yet you sound most miserable?
little beings rushing to constantly find food sex and water before they lose the game,
Little compared to what?

What game?

Given you say we're going to be doing it over and over again I fail to understand what the issue is? Now from my point of view you only do it once so I can understand a bit of angst.

Who rushes to find water in our world? You just turn a tap on.
like a mad dash or party gag, which is rarely fun at first and gets even worse as time goes on, like a 2 dollar garbage indie game.
Why is it supposed to be fun? This your American pursuit of happiness idea?
thedoc
Posts: 6465
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 4:18 pm

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by thedoc »

GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:Presumably, all of the good planets have been destroyed or unavailiable, so im stuck on this one.
I suppose that's as good a fantasy as any. Too bad that no-one believes you.
User avatar
GreatandWiseTrixie
Posts: 1543
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:51 pm

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by GreatandWiseTrixie »

thedoc wrote:
GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:Presumably, all of the good planets have been destroyed or unavailiable, so im stuck on this one.
I suppose that's as good a fantasy as any. Too bad that no-one believes you.
Another logical contradiction from the peanut gallery. He claims aliens aren't real, yet implies there still good planets in the universe that have rooms to go to.
User avatar
GreatandWiseTrixie
Posts: 1543
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:51 pm

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by GreatandWiseTrixie »

Arising_uk wrote:
GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:Life is a battle of inches, always has been. I don't see how battling for resources is my idea of a good time.
You hardly battle for resources in your part of the world.
Life is a laughable joke,
And yet you sound most miserable?
little beings rushing to constantly find food sex and water before they lose the game,
Little compared to what?

What game?

Given you say we're going to be doing it over and over again I fail to understand what the issue is? Now from my point of view you only do it once so I can understand a bit of angst.

Who rushes to find water in our world? You just turn a tap on.
like a mad dash or party gag, which is rarely fun at first and gets even worse as time goes on, like a 2 dollar garbage indie game.
Why is it supposed to be fun? This your American pursuit of happiness idea?
More logic contradictions, from the more scientific peanut yet more anal retentive peanut gallery.

He claimed that I evolved on this planet therefore it is the best place to be. Yet now he refers to me as a single point singularity which did not experience the hardship of evolution over eons, yet simply an entity which "turns on the tap water" as the result of evolution so to speak.

His other logical contradictions are beyond silly, as he is aware of my sarcasm yet treats my statement's as literal. For example, I imply that life is not fun, yet he asks "why would life be fun"? Also acts confused at my statement "life is a joke" and implies such is a positive statement to my joy in life. Sillyness.
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by Arising_uk »

GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:More logic contradictions, from the more scientific peanut yet more anal retentive peanut gallery.
He claimed that I evolved on this planet therefore it is the best place to be. ...
You think it not?
Yet now he refers to me as a single point singularity which did not experience the hardship of evolution over eons, ...
You didn't but your body is the result of the evolutionary process, hence I doubt there are any planets nearby that are more suited for you.
simply an entity which "turns on the tap water" as the result of evolution so to speak.
Nope, it is that you claimed life was a struggle for water and yet you live in a time and place where the only struggle is to turn a tap.
His other logical contradictions are beyond silly, as he is aware of my sarcasm yet treats my statement's as literal.
Given you claim one of the Buddha's Noble truths as the basis for your thought I just thought that you should embrace the rest and laugh the belly-laugh of the enlightened.
For example, I imply that life is not fun, yet he asks "why would life be fun"?
You claim life is suffering but bemoan that it is not fun?
Also acts confused at my statement "life is a joke" and implies such is a positive statement to my joy in life. Sillyness.
Over here we laugh at jokes, dark tho' they maybe, thats the point of a joke.

I'm still puzzled, given your beliefs and that you claim them true, why don't just top yourself and see if the next incarnation is like your deja vu, i.e. slightly different.
Post Reply