~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

How should society be organised, if at all?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

User avatar
Bill Wiltrack
Posts: 5456
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:52 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Contact:

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by Bill Wiltrack »

.



OVER 50% of the citizens in America are women.


Where are they in politics? WHERE HAVE THEY BEEN?




~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~ ...and this mantra GOES BEYOND INDIVIDUAL POLITICAL PARTIES



ONCE YOU SAY THIS MANTRA TO YOURSELF, REPEAT IT, YOU WILL BELIEVE IN IT.



Then you realize - it feels natural. It FEELS right.



ALL HAIL - the FIRST woman in the White House!!!!






.
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by Arising_uk »

So if Sarah Palin was the only female candidate you'd vote for her?
thedoc
Posts: 6465
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 4:18 pm

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by thedoc »

Arising_uk wrote:So if Sarah Palin was the only female candidate you'd vote for her?

Yep, with any luck she'd get into office and wouldn't do anything. Best President ever.


One thing she could do, declare open season on whiny liberal politicians.
artisticsolution
Posts: 1933
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:38 am

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by artisticsolution »

thedoc wrote:
Arising_uk wrote:So if Sarah Palin was the only female candidate you'd vote for her?

Yep, with any luck she'd get into office and wouldn't do anything. Best President ever.


One thing she could do, declare open season on whiny liberal politicians.


LOL

"I want clean air to breathe! Waaaaaa!"

"I want civil rights! Waaaaa!"

"I want affordable healthcare! Waaaaaa!"

"I want to end poverty! Waaaaa!"

"I want world peace! Waaaaaa!"

etc...

Dirty rotten liberals...Someone should take em out back and beat the crap outta 'em!
User avatar
Bill Wiltrack
Posts: 5456
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:52 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Contact:

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by Bill Wiltrack »

.



For ALL OF the, I wants in the above post - AND MORE...THAT is why I want a woman in the White House!







...................................................
Image




It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House.


Allow me to reiterate myself - I WILL VOTE FOR the FIRST woman candidate for President from ANY political party. Period.


Why is that so extraordinary?



It's time.







.
artisticsolution
Posts: 1933
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:38 am

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by artisticsolution »

I would like to see a woman in the white house too, Bill.
But I would not vote for Sarah Palin because I think she would be worse than bush.
User avatar
GreatandWiseTrixie
Posts: 1543
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:51 pm

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by GreatandWiseTrixie »

artisticsolution wrote:I would like to see a woman in the white house too, Bill.
But I would not vote for Sarah Palin because I think she would be worse than bush.
Their all muppets, puppets. One puppet has a vag, the other has a cluster, a bush. Only difference is cosmetic and a couple extra bonuses.
thedoc
Posts: 6465
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 4:18 pm

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by thedoc »

artisticsolution wrote: LOL

etc...
Dirty rotten liberals...Someone should take em out back and beat the crap outta 'em!


The liberal mantra, - I want to tax the hell out of everyone, line my own pockets, and then help a few of my supporters with whatever is left.
artisticsolution
Posts: 1933
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:38 am

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by artisticsolution »

That is what you'd n like to think but there are zero facts to support that point of view as both past parties have raised taxes.

But still...even if that were true it still wouldn't be a justification to allow war, pollution, Inequality, Etc.

It just common sense prioritizing. Which comes first...hhumans or money?

Everyone would choose people if they were the person in need...jjust ask Ted Cruz. Seems to me he is ready to jump on the Obama care bandwagon when he doesn't have his wife's insurance coverage any longer.

Duh.
artisticsolution
Posts: 1933
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:38 am

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by artisticsolution »

GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:
artisticsolution wrote:I would like to see a woman in the white house too, Bill.
But I would not vote for Sarah Palin because I think she would be worse than bush.
Their all muppets, puppets. One puppet has a vag, the other has a cluster, a bush. Only difference is cosmetic and a couple extra bonuses.
Are you like every other person? I don't understand your reasoning here? Are you saying that all politicians are the same?
User avatar
GreatandWiseTrixie
Posts: 1543
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:51 pm

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by GreatandWiseTrixie »

artisticsolution wrote:
GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:
artisticsolution wrote:I would like to see a woman in the white house too, Bill.
But I would not vote for Sarah Palin because I think she would be worse than bush.
Their all muppets, puppets. One puppet has a vag, the other has a cluster, a bush. Only difference is cosmetic and a couple extra bonuses.
Are you like every other person? I don't understand your reasoning here? Are you saying that all politicians are the same?
They have slight cosmetic differences. Some have slight benefits over others. As far as presidents go, they are hand-picked. Sure you might get a vegan senator every once and a while who geniunely wants to help, but a president who steps out of line just winds up in a ditch.
artisticsolution
Posts: 1933
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:38 am

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by artisticsolution »

GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:

They have slight cosmetic differences. Some have slight benefits over others. As far as presidents go, they are hand-picked. Sure you might get a vegan senator every once and a while who geniunely wants to help, but a president who steps out of line just winds up in a ditch.
I respectfully disagree. Sure, all presidents have to follow the laws of the country, however, I do believe they are servants of the people. Even with all the money in the world, a presidential candidate will not be elected by the people if they are not happy.

The problem I see is with the masses. Republicans get out to vote no matter what...and usually are swayed by big money campaigns (cause they are a little gullible). On the other hand, dems (who outnumber republicans) only come out to vote when they have had enough and the shit has hit the fan (like Bush's great recession fiasco).
User avatar
GreatandWiseTrixie
Posts: 1543
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:51 pm

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by GreatandWiseTrixie »

artisticsolution wrote:
GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:

They have slight cosmetic differences. Some have slight benefits over others. As far as presidents go, they are hand-picked. Sure you might get a vegan senator every once and a while who geniunely wants to help, but a president who steps out of line just winds up in a ditch.
I respectfully disagree. Sure, all presidents have to follow the laws of the country, however, I do believe they are servants of the people. Even with all the money in the world, a presidential candidate will not be elected by the people if they are not happy.

The problem I see is with the masses. Republicans get out to vote no matter what...and usually are swayed by big money campaigns (cause they are a little gullible). On the other hand, dems (who outnumber republicans) only come out to vote when they have had enough and the shit has hit the fan (like Bush's great recession fiasco).
Ridiculous. The unenlightened masses don't make choices, they cannot make the judgement call.
How is only being offered two parties and two candidates fair at all? Imagine going to every store, and only being able to pick from two items, and each store had the exact same two items to pick from, these two items being a foodwater generic lifesupport beverage and a pair of used dirty socks.
User avatar
Bill Wiltrack
Posts: 5456
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:52 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Contact:

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by Bill Wiltrack »

.







Actually, the masses do make choices in a Democracy, they make the judgement call.
We in America are offered many more than two parties and two candidates.

Imagine going to a store, and being able to pick from many different items.






.
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: ~ It's Time For a Woman to be in the White House ~

Post by Arising_uk »

According to you you're going to pick anyone as long as it is a woman, so you'd vote for Palin if she was the only female candidate.

All this yakking is because you think Clinton is going to be a shoo-in as the republicans are in disarray but all we see over here is a democracy that is run by wealthy oligarchs and first families with few exceptions.
Post Reply