Mirror on the Moon

For all things philosophical.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: Mirror on the Moon

Post by Arising_uk »

What about the rocks. How did they fake those?
Blaggard
Posts: 2245
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2014 9:17 pm

Re: Mirror on the Moon

Post by Blaggard »

You fool UK, they went to the moon collected a lot of rocks, came back and the faked the fake moon landing with their own moon landing footage that they did whilst on the moon...

Seriously dude you are so naïve.
Blaggard
Posts: 2245
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2014 9:17 pm

Re: Mirror on the Moon

Post by Blaggard »

Pluto wrote:
Blaggard wrote:Why is it every time says answer the question someone says there wasn't one. Isn't that just a a lazy way of avoiding arguments. There are never any questions on this forum even when you use a question mark or so I have found, just prevarication in the face of not wanting to answer salient points ever.

That just means you lose you have no answers by the way, just a heads up. You really do suck, and instead of admitting it you say what question in the face of all the unceasing questions. Hope that works out for you. ;)

That is dumb ass argumentation style though that a 5 year old grows out of at age 3.

Can't answer the topic then don't, we all know you can't regardless of the stalling you seem to think is the height of bon mot. Being unable to answer anything and then saying what question is like a a moron finally having an epiphany only to find he just actually shit himself as well.
Your obviously upset. And wrong.
Well I replied to that but the thought police deleted it so with that in mind, I was not upset and you can lick my balls. I'll be fucked if I type all that again. :D

Upset at what though, suffice to say just another lazy fool saying what question in the face of question marks. It doesn't upset me it just makes me depressed at the indolence of some people.

You bore me. You probably bore yourself too. Good luck with that inane shit though, you're batting a thousand: you win the debate by saying that, just like anyone wins by comparing people to the Nazis. ;)

Lazy...

Do feel free to report me for this too, in lieu of any cogent argument, you are after all batting a thousand. :D
Pluto
Posts: 1856
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 9:26 pm
Location: Belgium

Re: Mirror on the Moon

Post by Pluto »

What about the rocks. How did they fake those?
Rocks can be made out of paper-mache and some paint. But what about the mirrors left on the moon, what do they look like, the shape and form, etc, do we know?
thedoc
Posts: 6465
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 4:18 pm

Re: Mirror on the Moon

Post by thedoc »

Hobbes' Choice wrote: Hoaxers -15. Mooners 100%.[/color]

Did we just get Mooned by those D.O.M.'s that went to the Moon?
User avatar
GreatandWiseTrixie
Posts: 1543
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:51 pm

Re: Mirror on the Moon

Post by GreatandWiseTrixie »

Pluto wrote:
What about the rocks. How did they fake those?
Rocks can be made out of paper-mache and some paint. But what about the mirrors left on the moon, what do they look like, the shape and form, etc, do we know?
Telescopes cant see from that far out. There are several different corner mirrors availiable on ebay, your guess is as good as mine.
thedoc
Posts: 6465
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 4:18 pm

Re: Mirror on the Moon

Post by thedoc »

Pluto wrote: But what about the mirrors left on the moon, what do they look like, the shape and form, etc, do we know?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Lase ... experiment
thedoc
Posts: 6465
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 4:18 pm

Re: Mirror on the Moon

Post by thedoc »

GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:
Pluto wrote: But what about the mirrors left on the moon, what do they look like, the shape and form, etc, do we know?
Telescopes cant see from that far out.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble_Deep_Field
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: Mirror on the Moon

Post by Arising_uk »

Pluto wrote:Rocks can be made out of paper-mache and some paint. But what about the mirrors left on the moon, what do they look like, the shape and form, etc, do we know?
But you can't fake the isotope ratios nor their composition.
User avatar
GreatandWiseTrixie
Posts: 1543
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:51 pm

Re: Mirror on the Moon

Post by GreatandWiseTrixie »

I don't see any pics of the mirrors taken by the Hubble telescope, only by the supposed moon landing footage.

Assuming that NASA is fake, why would you believe the isotope ratios are legit? Also I don't see how moon rocks wouldn't be composed of common elements. Also, they could have transformed matter into rocks and gave them strange ratios.
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: Mirror on the Moon

Post by Arising_uk »

GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:I don't see any pics of the mirrors taken by the Hubble telescope, only by the supposed moon landing footage.
The Hubble doesn't have the resolution, you'd need a 75m+ telescope just to see the lander.
Assuming that NASA is fake, why would you believe the isotope ratios are legit?
Because it wasn't just NASA doing the analysis.
Also I don't see how moon rocks wouldn't be composed of common elements.
They are but formed under different conditions.
Also, they could have transformed matter into rocks and gave them strange ratios.
The gases in the rocks come from the solar wind and were captured when the rocks were formed and are, as predicted, different in the isotopic ratios from those formed upon the Earth. We couldn't do this.
User avatar
GreatandWiseTrixie
Posts: 1543
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:51 pm

Re: Mirror on the Moon

Post by GreatandWiseTrixie »

Arising_uk wrote:
GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:I don't see any pics of the mirrors taken by the Hubble telescope, only by the supposed moon landing footage.
The Hubble doesn't have the resolution, you'd need a 75m+ telescope just to see the lander.
Hmm, as I suspected... thedoc is wrong as per usual, no suprises there.
Assuming that NASA is fake, why would you believe the isotope ratios are legit?
Because it wasn't just NASA doing the analysis.
Also I don't see how moon rocks wouldn't be composed of common elements.
They are but formed under different conditions.
Also, they could have transformed matter into rocks and gave them strange ratios.
The gases in the rocks come from the solar wind and were captured when the rocks were formed and are, as predicted, different in the isotopic ratios from those formed upon the Earth. We couldn't do this.
How do you know NASA didn't just collect some asteroids or fresh meteors?
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: Mirror on the Moon

Post by Arising_uk »

GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:How do you know NASA didn't just collect some asteroids or fresh meteors?
They'd not have the same composition and from what I gather lunar meteorites are as rare as hen's teeth.

http://meteorites.wustl.edu/lunar/howdoweknow.htm

When did we get to the asteroids?
Pluto
Posts: 1856
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 9:26 pm
Location: Belgium

Re: Mirror on the Moon

Post by Pluto »

But you can't fake the isotope ratios nor their composition.
Moon rock falls to earth:

"Since 1980, over 120 lunar meteorites representing about 60 different meteorite fall events (none witnessed) have been collected on Earth..."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_rock
User avatar
GreatandWiseTrixie
Posts: 1543
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:51 pm

Re: Mirror on the Moon

Post by GreatandWiseTrixie »

Arising_uk wrote:
GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:How do you know NASA didn't just collect some asteroids or fresh meteors?
They'd not have the same composition and from what I gather lunar meteorites are as rare as hen's teeth.

http://meteorites.wustl.edu/lunar/howdoweknow.htm

When did we get to the asteroids?
Figured one might have drifted into the shuttles orbit.
Post Reply