TOXIC WARNING 1011 GMO FOODS SCIENCE EXPLANATION. DANGER!!!

How does science work? And what's all this about quantum mechanics?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
User avatar
GreatandWiseTrixie
Posts: 1543
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:51 pm

TOXIC WARNING 1011 GMO FOODS SCIENCE EXPLANATION. DANGER!!!

Post by GreatandWiseTrixie »

People are concerned with GMO foods causing cancer.

But what if GMO's caused addiction to the food? Creating a safety net for producers if GMO's are repealed.

We've seen it before. Putting crack cocaine in Coca Cola, then repealling it. Then people are still hooked on Coke.

What if GMO's are the same deal? Causing addictions on the DNA level, altering your very brain chemistry to attract itself to the GMO dna instead of regular fruit dna?

This way, consumers will have a safety net in case GMO's are tried to ban. "We can't, its too late. They already are addicted!" TOXIC WARNING 1011
User avatar
WanderingLands
Posts: 819
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 3:39 am
Contact:

Re: TOXIC WARNING 1011 GMO FOODS SCIENCE EXPLANATION. DANGER

Post by WanderingLands »

There actually is scientific evidence for GMOs causing addiction. I posted a video on here some time ago which discusses it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cpdb78pWl4
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: TOXIC WARNING 1011 GMO FOODS SCIENCE EXPLANATION. DANGER

Post by Arising_uk »

GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:...
We've seen it before. Putting crack cocaine in Coca Cola, then repealling it. Then people are still hooked on Coke.
Er! What?

The main original ingredients of coca-cola were cocaine and caffeine from the coca leaf and the kola nut - hence Coca-Cola. They'd still be making it this way if allowed and selling even more than now. No crack-cocaine at all!
What if GMO's are the same deal? Causing addictions on the DNA level, altering your very brain chemistry to attract itself to the GMO dna instead of regular fruit dan?
If they could do this then one of the biggest problems in genetics would have been solved! That is how to easily make changes to our dna.
This way, consumers will have a safety net in case GMO's are tried to ban. "We can't, its too late. They already are addicted!" TOXIC WARNING 1011
Since it's not about attraction to dna but attraction to taste I doubt any of this.
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: TOXIC WARNING 1011 GMO FOODS SCIENCE EXPLANATION. DANGER

Post by Arising_uk »

WanderingLands wrote:There actually is scientific evidence for GMOs causing addiction. I posted a video on here some time ago which discusses it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cpdb78pWl4
Where? As for my sins I watched the video and couldn't find anything about GMO's.
User avatar
vegetariantaxidermy
Posts: 13975
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
Location: Narniabiznus

Re: TOXIC WARNING 1011 GMO FOODS SCIENCE EXPLANATION. DANGER

Post by vegetariantaxidermy »

I read a sci fi story once along similar lines. The population was fed a pill, every day, that made everyone happy (not prozac). It was the Govts. way of keeping everyone under control.
User avatar
SpheresOfBalance
Posts: 5725
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:27 pm
Location: On a Star Dust Metamorphosis

Re: TOXIC WARNING 1011 GMO FOODS SCIENCE EXPLANATION. DANGER

Post by SpheresOfBalance »

Arising_uk wrote:
WanderingLands wrote:There actually is scientific evidence for GMOs causing addiction. I posted a video on here some time ago which discusses it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cpdb78pWl4
Where? As for my sins I watched the video and couldn't find anything about GMO's.
You have to be aware of other facts, Arising.

Fact: Amost all potatoes are GMO. http://www.gmo-compass.org/eng/database ... otato.html

Fact: Acrylamide is produced in potatoes when cooked above about 246 degrees F. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acrylamide ... d_exposure

And the list goes on and on.

But ask yourself something, would they tell you if they altered the food for that purpose? I don't think so. But the fact that they feed food to people that they know is carcinogenic, is proof enough to me!
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: TOXIC WARNING 1011 GMO FOODS SCIENCE EXPLANATION. DANGER

Post by Arising_uk »

SpheresOfBalance wrote:You have to be aware of other facts, Arising.

Fact: Amost all potatoes are GMO. http://www.gmo-compass.org/eng/database ... otato.html
Do you read the stuff you post? None in Europe are for human consumption and the ones that are are not currently GMO. Although this is likely to change with the way the current trade-agreement between the EU and US is going.

My only issue with GMO's is the possible problem of transference to wild-plants. My other main issue is with the big companies owning the rights to the DNA of everything they can sample and the problem of single-variety crops and the closing or selling off to private industry of the seedbanks of varietal strains. This can be a big problem, see the current banana crisis and the near loss of wheat as a crop a while back.
Fact: Acrylamide is produced in potatoes when cooked above about 246 degrees F. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acrylamide ... d_exposure
Don't eat chips then, not least because they make you fat.
And the list goes on and on.

But ask yourself something, would they tell you if they altered the food for that purpose? I don't think so. But the fact that they feed food to people that they know is carcinogenic, is proof enough to me!
Pretty much everything we eat can be carcinogenic. The issue was can GMO's affect your DNA and I think the answer currently is no, as if it could then we'd be well upon the way to solving cancer as an issue.
User avatar
SpheresOfBalance
Posts: 5725
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:27 pm
Location: On a Star Dust Metamorphosis

Re: TOXIC WARNING 1011 GMO FOODS SCIENCE EXPLANATION. DANGER

Post by SpheresOfBalance »

Arising_uk wrote:
SpheresOfBalance wrote:You have to be aware of other facts, Arising.

Fact: Amost all potatoes are GMO. http://www.gmo-compass.org/eng/database ... otato.html
Do you read the stuff you post? None in Europe are for human consumption and the ones that are are not currently GMO. Although this is likely to change with the way the current trade-agreement between the EU and US is going.

My only issue with GMO's is the possible problem of transference to wild-plants. My other main issue is with the big companies owning the rights to the DNA of everything they can sample and the problem of single-variety crops and the closing or selling off to private industry of the seedbanks of varietal strains. This can be a big problem, see the current banana crisis and the near loss of wheat as a crop a while back.
Fact: Acrylamide is produced in potatoes when cooked above about 246 degrees F. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acrylamide ... d_exposure
Don't eat chips then, not least because they make you fat.
And the list goes on and on.

But ask yourself something, would they tell you if they altered the food for that purpose? I don't think so. But the fact that they feed food to people that they know is carcinogenic, is proof enough to me!
Pretty much everything we eat can be carcinogenic. The issue was can GMO's affect your DNA and I think the answer currently is no, as if it could then we'd be well upon the way to solving cancer as an issue.
Do you listen to yourself, if there is money in not treating cancer, even making sure one gets it, then a cure shall never come, by design, until they can think of another cash crop to feed the pharmaceutical industry!

It's in fact a falsehood that everything can be carcinogenic, show me the data!

Mrs. spiteful! If not, drop the crap. Like I've said, I've always had faith in you! Chaz was much worse than you, by the way, and the "GOAT BOY" was off the charts, bat shit crazy. If he hasn't already secretly killed someone, he shall, if he doesn't have a change of "heart."
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: TOXIC WARNING 1011 GMO FOODS SCIENCE EXPLANATION. DANGER

Post by Arising_uk »

SpheresOfBalance wrote:Do you listen to yourself, if there is money in not treating cancer, even making sure one gets it, then a cure shall never come, by design, until they can think of another cash crop to feed the pharmaceutical industry!
There pretty much is no such thing as 'cancer' per se, it's a host of things and medicine pretty much thinks there will be no 'cure' in the sense you want but just rafts of treatment for each individual 'cancer', not least being some way to halt cell-replication at a DNA level. Unless of course they discover what some are proposing and that is that many cancers are caused by viruses.
It's in fact a falsehood that everything can be carcinogenic, show me the data!
Fair point, I was involving myself in a touch of hyperbole as excess consumption of pretty much anything can be harmful for you. It's like when we were told that sweeteners were carcinogenic but what was omitted was the amount we'd have to consume for that to possibly happen. I think this applies to many of the carcinogens, not that I think they can't cause 'cancer' but we should always have the amount needed to be consumed as well.

You appear to have ignored the fact that GMO potatoes are not eaten over here?
Mrs. spiteful! If not, drop the crap. Like I've said, I've always had faith in you! Chaz was much worse than you, by the way, and the "GOAT BOY" was off the charts, bat shit crazy. If he hasn't already secretly killed someone, he shall, if he doesn't have a change of "heart."
I've told you before, I have no interest in your opinion of me nor any need for your 'faith'.
User avatar
SpheresOfBalance
Posts: 5725
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:27 pm
Location: On a Star Dust Metamorphosis

Re: TOXIC WARNING 1011 GMO FOODS SCIENCE EXPLANATION. DANGER

Post by SpheresOfBalance »

Arising_uk wrote:
SpheresOfBalance wrote:Do you listen to yourself, if there is money in not treating cancer, even making sure one gets it, then a cure shall never come, by design, until they can think of another cash crop to feed the pharmaceutical industry!
There pretty much is no such thing as 'cancer' per se, it's a host of things and medicine pretty much thinks there will be no 'cure' in the sense you want but just rafts of treatment for each individual 'cancer', not least being some way to halt cell-replication at a DNA level. Unless of course they discover what some are proposing and that is that many cancers are caused by viruses.
They have already proven that many foreign bodies/chemicals cause cancer. Look at smoking tobacco for instance, viruses, smiruses??? A lot of food additives cause cancer it's a fact. And the lying US Dept of Agriculture, and FDA continue to say, but not in these minuscule amounts, screw that crap, bad is bad, and how about cumulative affects.
It's in fact a falsehood that everything can be carcinogenic, show me the data!
Fair point, I was involving myself in a touch of hyperbole as excess consumption of pretty much anything can be harmful for you. It's like when we were told that sweeteners were carcinogenic but what was omitted was the amount we'd have to consume for that to possibly happen. I think this applies to many of the carcinogens, not that I think they can't cause 'cancer' but we should always have the amount needed to be consumed as well.

You appear to have ignored the fact that GMO potatoes are not eaten over here?
But we do over here. What are the cancer statistics relating to the UK and US relative to population? And you don't have to convince me that in the UK they seem to care about their people more so than over here, I've known that since the 80's pertaining to the pertussis vaccine. Remember, I LIVE OVER HERE! So I'm bound to not care much for the way you guys do business, other than to envy it, and what good does that do for me? I'm only concerned what the US does, relating to my health.
Mrs. spiteful! If not, drop the crap. Like I've said, I've always had faith in you! Chaz was much worse than you, by the way, and the "GOAT BOY" was off the charts, bat shit crazy. If he hasn't already secretly killed someone, he shall, if he doesn't have a change of "heart."
I've told you before, I have no interest in your opinion of me nor any need for your 'faith'.
Beat your chest a little louder, in spite of the truth, they couldn't hear it on the moon. Everyone likes compliments, no matter how slight.
Post Reply