A revolution in thought
A revolution in thought
Hi to everyone,
I was here a awhile ago but the discussion didn't get too far. I'm trying to revive a short discussion on the topic of determinism because this leads to a discovery that has yet to be thoroughly investigated. Will you all give me the benefit of the doubt? I hope so.
I was here a awhile ago but the discussion didn't get too far. I'm trying to revive a short discussion on the topic of determinism because this leads to a discovery that has yet to be thoroughly investigated. Will you all give me the benefit of the doubt? I hope so.
Re: A revolution in thought
Maybe you should be better at asking the question, instead of preliminary probeing.
- The Voice of Time
- Posts: 2212
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:18 pm
- Location: Norway
Re: A revolution in thought
Why haven't you asked the question yet? O.o
- GreatandWiseTrixie
- Posts: 1543
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:51 pm
Re: A revolution in thought
It's a type of game women play... A woman is like a leaf in the wind, fluttering about, unsure of whether or not she should land, or in this case, reveal whatever "secret" she has in store. This provides her with two things, providing an aura and illusion of mystery about her, and providing her with her own personal amusement. By this time, she has probably abandoned the forums altogether, in search of new novelty, and new people to share in her silly games.The Voice of Time wrote:Why haven't you asked the question yet? O.o
- The Voice of Time
- Posts: 2212
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:18 pm
- Location: Norway
Re: A revolution in thought
I doubt she found amusement. More likely she's some kind of emotionally unbalanced person who who suddenly got the angst when it was time to show what it's about.
May be a chance she forgot it in the original post as well only to be to cowardly to continue.
May be a chance she forgot it in the original post as well only to be to cowardly to continue.
- GreatandWiseTrixie
- Posts: 1543
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:51 pm
Re: A revolution in thought
She did it due to her own hormonal flooding, trust me it was her bowing to the winds of pleasure. I can hear her frightful, fickle giggles echo in me now.The Voice of Time wrote:I doubt she found amusement. More likely she's some kind of emotionally unbalanced person who who suddenly got the angst when it was time to show what it's about.
May be a chance she forgot it in the original post as well only to be to cowardly to continue.
- The Voice of Time
- Posts: 2212
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:18 pm
- Location: Norway
Re: A revolution in thought
Unless you're her, then no, you can't.
- GreatandWiseTrixie
- Posts: 1543
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:51 pm
Re: A revolution in thought
I can. I know how the woman thinks, how she feels. Humans are basically all the same model of robot, with slightly different parameters from one another. It is not magic how Sherlock deduces personalities so effortlessly. In fact, due to the brainwashing and delusion inflicted upon them by the stream known as the "main", I know many better than they know themselves. Kinda like being at a mental hospital where the crazies won't admit they're a certain way, because they refuse to examine their own inner machinations. In addition, due to Poe's Law, fear, and pride, people will desperately lie and avoid admitting anything truthful about themselves for various reasons.The Voice of Time wrote:Unless you're her, then no, you can't.
Re: A revolution in thought
I am disappointed now, I thought Peacegirl was reviving her thread, and there was going to be some entertainment, but then I found it was just you 2 posting on something you know nothing about.
- GreatandWiseTrixie
- Posts: 1543
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:51 pm
Re: A revolution in thought
I know something about it. Something is not nothing, and this particular something was probably of greater rarity than anything she had to offer. I don't know what her original question was going to be, neither do I care to. I doubt it was anything of interest, even for someone as easily intrigued as you. I'd imagine she long abandoned this wastelands of a forum, no doubt due to too many dried up old men, and boring threads, in my opinion.thedoc wrote:I am disappointed now, I thought Peacegirl was reviving her thread, and there was going to be some entertainment, but then I found it was just you 2 posting on something you know nothing about.
As for me posting in the thread, I thought it was fairly obvious, if you look at any thread it should show the name of the last poster on the thread title on the left.
Re: A revolution in thought
You and VOT know nothing about Peacegirl, she had knowledge that would end all war and crime on Earth, and you know nothing about it.GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:I know something about it. Something is not nothing, and this particular something was probably of greater rarity than anything she had to offer. I don't know what her original question was going to be, neither do I care to. I doubt it was anything of interest, even for someone as easily intrigued as you. I'd imagine she long abandoned this wastelands of a forum, no doubt due to too many dried up old men, and boring threads, in my opinion.thedoc wrote:I am disappointed now, I thought Peacegirl was reviving her thread, and there was going to be some entertainment, but then I found it was just you 2 posting on something you know nothing about.
As for me posting in the thread, I thought it was fairly obvious, if you look at any thread it should show the name of the last poster on the thread title on the left.
- GreatandWiseTrixie
- Posts: 1543
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:51 pm
Re: A revolution in thought
Highly doubtful, and if she did, you are being quite obtuse about it. Share your knowledge with us. Unless of course, she was just leading you on...thedoc wrote:You and VOT know nothing about Peacegirl, she had knowledge that would end all war and crime on Earth, and you know nothing about it.GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:I know something about it. Something is not nothing, and this particular something was probably of greater rarity than anything she had to offer. I don't know what her original question was going to be, neither do I care to. I doubt it was anything of interest, even for someone as easily intrigued as you. I'd imagine she long abandoned this wastelands of a forum, no doubt due to too many dried up old men, and boring threads, in my opinion.thedoc wrote:I am disappointed now, I thought Peacegirl was reviving her thread, and there was going to be some entertainment, but then I found it was just you 2 posting on something you know nothing about.
As for me posting in the thread, I thought it was fairly obvious, if you look at any thread it should show the name of the last poster on the thread title on the left.
Re: A revolution in thought
You first, I contend that you know nothing, prove me wrong? Others here, and those who have been reading these threads, know that I know Peacegirl quite well.GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:Highly doubtful, and if she did, you are being quite obtuse about it. Share your knowledge with us. Unless of course, she was just leading you on...thedoc wrote:You and VOT know nothing about Peacegirl, she had knowledge that would end all war and crime on Earth, and you know nothing about it.GreatandWiseTrixie wrote: I know something about it. Something is not nothing, and this particular something was probably of greater rarity than anything she had to offer. I don't know what her original question was going to be, neither do I care to. I doubt it was anything of interest, even for someone as easily intrigued as you. I'd imagine she long abandoned this wastelands of a forum, no doubt due to too many dried up old men, and boring threads, in my opinion.
As for me posting in the thread, I thought it was fairly obvious, if you look at any thread it should show the name of the last poster on the thread title on the left.
- GreatandWiseTrixie
- Posts: 1543
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:51 pm
Re: A revolution in thought
Ah, your senility flares up again from the matter. It should be clear to any sane person that judging from the timestamps, I never met peacegirl. But of course, you have your senile delusions that I am some previous member of the forum.thedoc wrote: You first, I contend that you know nothing, prove me wrong? Others here, and those who have been reading these threads, know that I know Peacegirl quite well.
In addition, more senility from you asking me to prove that I know information, the same information which I asked you to share with me. If I knew the information, why would I ask you to share it with me? Ridiculous. I am beginning to think you've forgotten the information, due to your old age, and you are trying to cover the fact that you forgot such vital information crucial to the stability and integrity of a planet.
Re: A revolution in thought
Such insights, tho I would call it excessive attention whoring from OP.GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:It's a type of game women play... A woman is like a leaf in the wind, fluttering about, unsure of whether or not she should land, or in this case, reveal whatever "secret" she has in store. This provides her with two things, providing an aura and illusion of mystery about her, and providing her with her own personal amusement. By this time, she has probably abandoned the forums altogether, in search of new novelty, and new people to share in her silly games.