The French Question

[Brit Dems]

I am a bit surprised that nobody has mentioned the shootings in Paris, at the offices of Charlie Hebdo.

I am thinking that this has more to do with the French identity than it has to do with the idea of free speech, as touted by the media and liberal establishment.

Excellent!

Correct!

They are preparing the way for the French end of the "European Racial Partition". Have a look at the map. We have seen this coming.

[Lev Muishkin]

9 he married a nine year old girl, how the fuck don't people know that. In Europe it was considered fair play to sleep with any woman who had grass on the wicket, it being time to play cricket. Times change even if religion doesn't.

And also only Quran referring to the above is perfect, you link the "surahs", you are talking about primates justification for war, like the Christian crusades. It's always politics, religion is just the icing on the shit cake.

They also said there is no division in islam, but lasted less time than it did in Christianity. Not that I want to laud any religion but they are all just very wrong, when human nature is in the mix.

I kinda like the Sufists, at least they were philosophical if a minority of "sureness".

"Surely the ones who have believed, and the ones who have Judaized, and the SabiÉîn (The Sabaeans) and Nasara, (Christians) and the Majûs (The Magians) and the ones who have associated, (i.e. other gods with Allah) surely Allah will distinguish between them on the Day of the Resurrection; surely Allah is an Ever-present Witness over everything."

Qur'an, even the Devil can quote scripture, but the devil is in the non cherry picked details. For example it was the polytheists that the Imams really hated if you look deep enough, but no one looks further into anything when they have already decided evil is as it is. The Dhimmi or people of the book were always treated with utmost respect, even in war. Which is less than can be said of the crusades. Exept of course on the Muslim side, they didn't eat women and babies at least.

(I don't see anything in any book that recommends eating people), your remark are hysterical.

What the fuck difference do you think any of this means?
Fuck all.
Islam is an out-of-date moral system and needs, like Christianity, and Judaism to be replaced by something less evil.
The contention was is Islam "beautiful". Fuck no remains the answer.

[Lev Muishkin]

The killings at Charlie Hebdo brought into focus another religious division facing France. Not only is France facing an Islamic 'question' but it's also facing a much deeper one, the Jewish 'question'. There is a rise in anti-Semitism in France. This open wound has been with the French far longer than the one it faces with Islam. Many Jews have moved to Israel because of this deep festering sore in the body of France. And many more are contemplating the move. If this trend continues and grows, perhaps someday there wouldn't be any Jews left in France. And as one commentator put it, France without Jews will not be France.

The emigrating of French Jews to Israel will be a tremendous benefit for Israel. They are well educated and resourceful. So I found it very interesting that the prime minster of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, was in Paris for the big march supporting free speech and against terrorism. I am thinking he was there as a way of recruiting Jews for Israel, silently saying to them, why stay in a country that doesn't love and respect you.

Let's hope that all these questions induce soul-searching and deep thinking among the French in order that they become better equipped to deal with the future.

In a world where anti-semitism is illegal, Jews mistake anti Israel feeling with antisemitism. If they can't tell the difference, then they are batting for the wrong team in supporting Israel rather than France. Maybe its time for them to leave? So how they like it in the Middle East.

Muslims and Jews refusing to integrate and accept free speech and secular democracy would do well to emigrate to their progenitor countries and Israel respectively.
That way we can all get on with our own business.

However the West needs to stop fucking up the Middle East with invasions; funding of dictatorships and terrorists; political intrigue; other destabilisation techniques; and government overthrows.

Oh look a flying pig.

The world is fucked up.
Whilst people define themselves on racial and religious grounds there will never be peace.

[Brit Dems]

The killings at Charlie Hebdo brought into focus another religious division facing France. Not only is France facing an Islamic 'question' but it's also facing a much

Let's hope that all these questions induce soul-searching and deep thinking among the French in order that they become better equipped to deal with the future.

In a world where anti-semitism is illegal, Jews mistake anti Israel feeling with antisemitism. If they can't tell the difference, then they are batting for the wrong team in supporting Israel rather than France. Maybe its time for them to leave? So how they like it in the Middle East.

; . . . . . . .

The world is fucked up.
Whilst people define themselves on racial and religious grounds there will never be peace.

Racism is a Religion.

Racism properly managed is good Racialism.

[Lev Muishkin]

Racism is a Religion.

Racism properly managed is good Racialism.

Yes. The only good racist is a dead one.

Like all religions it is swallowed like the cum of dead men by morons and wankers. Which are you?

[Brit Dems]

Racism is a Religion.

Racism properly managed is good Racialism.

Yes. The only good racist is a dead one.

Like all religions it is swallowed like the cum of dead men by morons and wankers. Which are you?

We do not see the need to kill Racists. Racists need to catch up with us which will change them or maintain their position as part of our superseding structure.

Ok?

[Lev Muishkin]

Racism is a Religion.

Racism properly managed is good Racialism.

Yes. The only good racist is a dead one.

Like all religions it is swallowed like the cum of dead men by morons and wankers. Which are you?

We do not see the need to kill Racists. Racists need to catch up with us which will change them or maintain their position as part of our superseding structure.

Ok?

AH...ok... a sad moronic wanker.
thanks for answering the question.

[Blaggard]

9 he married a nine year old girl, how the fuck don't people know that. In Europe it was considered fair play to sleep with any woman who had grass on the wicket, it being time to play cricket. Times change even if religion doesn't.

And also only Quran referring to the above is perfect, you link the "surahs", you are talking about primates justification for war, like the Christian crusades. It's always politics, religion is just the icing on the shit cake.

They also said there is no division in islam, but lasted less time than it did in Christianity. Not that I want to laud any religion but they are all just very wrong, when human nature is in the mix.

I kinda like the Sufists, at least they were philosophical if a minority of "sureness".

"Surely the ones who have believed, and the ones who have Judaized, and the SabiÉîn (The Sabaeans) and Nasara, (Christians) and the Majûs (The Magians) and the ones who have associated, (i.e. other gods with Allah) surely Allah will distinguish between them on the Day of the Resurrection; surely Allah is an Ever-present Witness over everything."

Qur'an, even the Devil can quote scripture, but the devil is in the non cherry picked details. For example it was the polytheists that the Imams really hated if you look deep enough, but no one looks further into anything when they have already decided evil is as it is. The Dhimmi or people of the book were always treated with utmost respect, even in war. Which is less than can be said of the crusades. Exept of course on the Muslim side, they didn't eat women and babies at least.

(I don't see anything in any book that recommends eating people), your remark are hysterical.

What the fuck difference do you think any of this means?
Fuck all.
Islam is an out-of-date moral system and needs, like Christianity, and Judaism to be replaced by something less evil.
The contention was is Islam "beautiful". Fuck no remains the answer.

In the battle of Acre the Crusaders were so starved that after they won the battle they ate women and children for food, spitted on pikes.

We have 2 sources for this, 1 a letter home from a man who was sorry, and 2 the military sources of its day.

I can provide them of course.

Richard the Lion Heart was served "pork" because it tasted much like human beings.

The first crusade not the third:

"I shudder to tell that many of our people, harassed by the madness of excessive hunger, cut pieces from the buttocks of the Saracens already dead there, which they cooked, but when it was not yet roasted enough by the fire, they devoured it with savage mouth"

Richard of Chartress.

[Lev Muishkin]

9 he married a nine year old girl, how the fuck don't people know that. In Europe it was considered fair play to sleep with any woman who had grass on the wicket, it being time to play cricket. Times change even if religion doesn't.

And also only Quran referring to the above is perfect, you link the "surahs", you are talking about primates justification for war, like the Christian crusades. It's always politics, religion is just the icing on the shit cake.

They also said there is no division in islam, but lasted less time than it did in Christianity. Not that I want to laud any religion but they are all just very wrong, when human nature is in the mix.

I kinda like the Sufists, at least they were philosophical if a minority of "sureness".

"Surely the ones who have believed, and the ones who have Judaized, and the SabiÉîn (The Sabaeans) and Nasara, (Christians) and the Majûs (The Magians) and the ones who have associated, (i.e. other gods with Allah) surely Allah will distinguish between them on the Day of the Resurrection; surely Allah is an Ever-present Witness over everything."

Qur'an, even the Devil can quote scripture, but the devil is in the non cherry picked details. For example it was the polytheists that the Imams really hated if you look deep enough, but no one looks further into anything when they have already decided evil is as it is. The Dhimmi or people of the book were always treated with utmost respect, even in war. Which is less than can be said of the crusades. Exept of course on the Muslim side, they didn't eat women and babies at least.

(I don't see anything in any book that recommends eating people), your remark are hysterical.

What the fuck difference do you think any of this means?
Fuck all.
Islam is an out-of-date moral system and needs, like Christianity, and Judaism to be replaced by something less evil.
The contention was is Islam "beautiful". Fuck no remains the answer.

In the battle of Acre the Crusaders were so starved that after they won the battle they ate women and children for food, spitted on pikes.

We have 2 sources for this, 1 a letter home from a man who was sorry, and 2 the military sources of its day.

I can provide them of course.

Richard the Lion Heart was served "pork" because it tasted much like human beings.

The first crusade not the third:

"I shudder to tell that many of our people, harassed by the madness of excessive hunger, cut pieces from the buttocks of the Saracens already dead there, which they cooked, but when it was not yet roasted enough by the fire, they devoured it with savage mouth"

Richard of Chartress.

Great. So what?

[Blaggard]

Great. So what?

He who is in a glass house should maybe not think about throwing stones was the point. Islam is only evil from the odd perspective of now.

[Lev Muishkin]

Great. So what?

He who is in a glass house should maybe not think about throwing stones was the point. Islam is only evil from the odd perspective of now.

Christianity. Judaism, and Islam are all evil in a range of ways.

BTW, I don't live in any of those greenhouses.

[HexHammer]

What is illogical about this matter, that the answer is always military might with upscaling of police force, etc, never the Gandhi way of peace and understanding.

If France just told these writers to stop acting stupid, and not insult very very rabiate muslims, then they could solve the problem for under 1000$, yet they intend to spend millions.

Retards! ..complete retards!!!

[Lev Muishkin]

What is illogical about this matter, that the answer is always military might with upscaling of police force, etc, never the Gandhi way of peace and understanding.

If France just told these writers to stop acting stupid, and not insult very very rabiate muslims, then they could solve the problem for under 1000$, yet they intend to spend millions.

Retards! ..complete retards!!!

The issue can be more easily solved that that. Don't fucking interfere in the politics of the middle east in the first place: a conflict that has cost the west trillions since 1918.

Putting a gag on a few cartoonists is not going to solve any problems. All it would do is place unreasonable burdens on free speech, which would only be of benefit to those that would enslave us all.

[henry quirk]

Two things...

-As I say up-thread: any one is free to say or write whatever the hell he or she likes. It's prudent, however, to be prepared for the consequences. Again: if you poke at a hornet nest, you shouldn't be surprised when the hornets swarm. Have a flamethrower on hand to burn the suckers mid-air when they do.

-While U.S. interference in the Middle East certainly accelerated things, the nutjobs (fundamentalist muslims) were gonna do what they've done (what they continue to do) no matter what. America has been a big buttinsky, sure, but that ain't why loons wanna burn it down (they wanna burn it down cuz they're loons).

[Lev Muishkin]

Two things...

-As I say up-thread: any one is free to say or write whatever the hell he or she likes. It's prudent, however, to be prepared for the consequences. Again: if you poke at a hornet nest, you shouldn't be surprised when the hornets swarm. Have a flamethrower on hand to burn the suckers mid-air when they do.

-While U.S. interference in the Middle East certainly accelerated things, the nutjobs (fundamentalist muslims) were gonna do what they've done (what they continue to do) no matter what. America has been a big buttinsky, sure, but that ain't why loons wanna burn it down (they wanna burn it down cuz they're loons).

You are the only loon is evidence.

We've been fucking the Middle East since 1918.
It took 70 years for the co-called "loons' to emerge as terrorists.
Work it out.