If this is the case then all animals are 'algorithms' running upon biological computers. But according to you below this 'algorithm' could possibly create more such 'people algorithms', so people appear very special.Bill Wiltrack wrote:.
People aren't that special. We are basically an algorithm running on a biologic computer.
Ever thought that this might be the actual case now, so why do you think we could improve upon it?It is entirely possible to emulate the human mind on a computer of sufficient capabilities, and that computer would be every bit as conscious as we are. Not only that, but it can be improved as to not have the problems we do.
"Mind" is a problematic word in Philosophy but then you choose not to know that. I guess you mean that we may be able to emulate the CNS on a computer but unless you link it up with senses it'll not be as conscious as we are. You could try and simulate a false environment for it but if it's as complicated as us then you'd need the computing power of the current universe I guess.
See this, "Not only that, but it can be improved as to not have the problems we do.", I think this kind of thought the result of two cultural themes that live large in the American, Christianity and Psychology or more specifically Fraudian psychoanalysis. The first lays down the idea of 'original sin', a 'fall from grace', a lost eden or utopia, a lost golden state of Man, etc. The second relegates reason to a seething set of unconscious drives and sexual desires. Together they produce the idea that there is a 'problem' with Man that needs to be fixed. It also explains why you are always chasing a chimera.
And yet nearly everyone is relevant and special to someone.People have this innate desire to be relevant and special, but we aren't.
For what? According to whom? According to you this is already too many. What is it that you worry about? That this 8 billion(always hate the fact that the billion has been downgraded and the meaning of the word debased) have brought the American cultural story and now want to live and consume at your levels?Again, 8 billion is enough...
Always ironic that those who consume the most wish others to stop reproducing when they consume the least. Here's a thought, Americans consume approx 35 times more than the poor of the world, now there's what? 270 million of you, times that by 35 and thats 9,450,000,000 people, so kill all Americans and problem solved, we'd have roughly doubled the resources for those left.
I still only see the Industrial Revolution, now if the Nano-tech Cornucopia machine or self-replicator gets built then there will be a Second Industrial Revolution, on-top of that will be a possible Biological Revolution.Any additions are not only selfish but irresponsible in this Third Industrial Revolution.[/size]
Anyhoo, all this yakking about population just disguises the reality that its not really a problem of population but economic politics.



