Everybody involved in these crimes against humanity, from the decision makers at the top to those doing the dirty work, should be indicted, arrested, prosecuted, convicted, imprisoned and subjected to the same brand of torture that their victims suffered on a daily basis. No, on second thought, just ship the bastards to Nuremberg where they belong.
Last edited by bobevenson on Wed Dec 10, 2014 8:23 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"A guise of obtaining valuable information from torture is a false narrative."
This thread is prompted by the release of a 6,000-plus page report detailing the torture inflicted on prisoners by CIA ops with the express purpose of extracting information.
To separate the two (the torture and the agenda) is disingenuous, Bill.
You can argue torture doesn't work (you may be right), but you can't dis-embed the details (torture) from the context.
Example: I capture a lady and spend a week slowly bleeding her to death. I do this for no reason except I want to and can.
This would be an unacceptable use of torture, yes?
Another: My kid is taken. I get my hands on one of the kidnappers. I use pliers, a butter knife, and tweezers to slowly dismantle this person. My goal is to get him to tell me where my kid is.
This could be an acceptable use of torture, yes?
The 'false narrative' (faulty premise) is: 'torture is never permissible/torture is always permissible'.
You have to consider that most people whom have been tortured by the authorities have been innocent, which is what is seen today in American torture. Plus that's too extreme to get answers; sure, self defense can be used as a last resort when a suspect becomes violent, but it's inefficient and unethical to do torture.